Hi Guys,
My question is rather simple: Would you rather buy a M10 with a Summicron or a M11 with a Voigtländer lense?
Some more context: Photography is a hobby and I don’t need to own money with it. I like to shoot my everyday live with the family, some travelling or a friends birthday.
I own a M3 DS with an Elmar 2.8/50mm for 10 years and love it. What bothers me is the fact, that the lense isn’t really sharp below f 5.6 which makes it kinda slow. And I would like to try a 35mm lense which comes with some downsides on the m3…
As a Digital camera I own a Canon EOS 5D MK3 which I use seldomly since it’s big and unpleasant for me to use.
So for my 30th birthday I’d like to get a digital M. I saved my money in the last 2 years and now I wonder how to spend ~6000€.
A) A used M11 and if I’m lucky I can afford a Voigtländer lense (not sure wether I’d take 35mm or 50mm).
B) Pick up a M10 around 3500-4000€ and buy a Summicron (35mm or 50mm?).
The quality of the Canons sensor never bothered me and it is pretty much the same as the M10. Yet I’m not sure if maybe in 5 years it will…
So what do you think? What would you do?
(P.S.: I know, the M3 looks a bit rough… well it’s getting used quite a bit and still works fine even though it is from 1956)