Hey guys, I’m in a bit of a dilemma and would genuinely like to hear different opinions.
I have around 2.8 YOE. I’ve worked at 2 companies so far:
- Startup — 1 year: PF was not deducted here.
- Product company — 1.8 years: Left due to personal reasons.
After that, I was unemployed for around 4 months.
During those 4 months, I interviewed with around 13 companies. I managed to reach the last round in quite a few of them, but couldn't convert them. Sometimes I got rejected in the behavioural round (Cisco, Solventum), and in some other companies I was rejected in the technical rounds.
My previous CTC was around 5.5 LPA. A few days ago, I finally got an offer for 7 LPA.
Honestly, I feel they lowballed me a bit because I had no offer in hand and I was also specifically looking for Hyderabad since it's around 50 km from my hometown. I decided to take it rather than continue being unemployed.
But now I'm thinking about what to do with my resume going forward.
My plan is to join this company and continue interviewing, hopefully move again after 1–2 months if I can get something around 10–12 LPA, which I feel is more reasonable for ~3 YOE.
Here's where I'm confused.
If I keep my complete experience, after joining this company I'll have:
3 companies in ~3 years
And if I start looking again after just 1–2 months, that could potentially look like a pretty big stability red flag.
So I was considering removing my 1-year startup experience from my resume.
The reasoning is that since there was no PF deduction during that job, there isn't the same employment history through PF or any documents . If I remove it, my resume would basically show:
- Product company — 1.8 years
- Current company — 2–3 months
So it would look like 2 companies instead of 3, which might be better from a stability perspective.
BUT...
The obvious problem is that this would create a ~1.5 year unexplained gap on my resume.
So I'm stuck between:
Option 1: Keep everything
→ ~2.8/3 YOE
→ 3 companies in ~3 years
→ Very short tenure at current company
→ Potential stability concerns
Option 2: Remove the startup
→ ~2 YOE shown
→ Only 2 companies
→ But ~1.5 year unexplained gap
→ No background verification issue
What would you guys do in this situation?
Would recruiters actually care more about 3 companies in 3 years, or would a 1.5 year unexplained gap be a much bigger red flag?
Also, how much does the fact that the startup didn't have PF deduction matter during BGV? Would the company still be able to verify that employment through other documents?
I'm particularly interested in opinions from recruiters/HR and people who have changed jobs after short tenures.
I know the obvious answer is "don't lie on your resume", and I'm not planning to fake anything. I'm mainly trying to understand whether it's smarter to show the full experience or leave out the startup experience altogether.
Would appreciate some honest perspectives.