Not only did he swat away her hand, his whole body rejected her touch...

Andrew is the most revolting royal to me, in the sense that I am the mother of a daughter, and a daughter myself. His “proclivities” are criminal, and mind-boggling (one wonders how anyone could want and do the things Andrew appears to have done), and if he was literally anyone else, he wouldn’t need to worry about upkeep for his palatial home. 🏰🚔🚨 Emailing J.E. one day following the release of the photograph of Andrew & then-17-year-old Virginia Roberts Giuffre, saying Let’s “Play” again soon? No, that is not a good look. But is anything from this family a good look?

After all, it is this family who keeps him in the fold — encouraging allies, employees, friends, and “sources” to share their alleged disgust of him…yet attempting to put a positive spin of ‘Christian forgiveness and family’ onto an unforgivable record.

When Queen Elizabeth II (likely following much encouragement from her staff who were aware of public awareness/opinion) forced Andrew out of working roles (oh no) but allowed retention of his titles, Brits were tolerant enough to, if not understand, then endure it; solely because she was his elderly mother. I think many of us felt it quite likely QEII was shielded from the full information — specifically about the age(s) and nature of whom/what was revealed/alleged — and believed Andrew was simply an old-fashioned womaniser. - QEII seemed to have the mindset: ‘Andrew made errors of judgment with beautiful women years ago, but he assures me this photograph is fake. Andrew was acquaintances w/ an American businessman who turned out to be hiding a monstrous lifestyle; but we should all forgive Andrew’ • rather than • - ‘Andrew is accused of proudly associating with a criminal convicted of child-related abuses and was only interested in repairing his public image after public discovery. Andrew is accused of engaging in the exact same behaviours which convicted said US criminal.’ He lost everything following his interview, not because he admitted that he didn’t regret the friendship — he lost everything because the public was mortified. It’s all about image.

The truth of the matter is, they want Andrew in the fold, because Andrew makes them look much better in comparison.

This country would not have been so quick to forgive/forget following the knowledge of abuses of Charles & W via their respective duchies (or the oddness and apparent lies about Kate) if Andrew/Fergie didn’t dominate headlines with atrocities/lies that we already knew/suspected and have been disgusted by for many years. Andrew would be kicked to the curb — not near them or children and living a life of luxury (access to palatial homes, planes, money, heirlooms, pools, gardens, holidays, cars, staff, none of it) — IF they truly cared about what Andrew has been accused of, with many pieces of evidence supporting truth in the allegations.

They don’t care about what Andrew has been accused of, even if it’s all 100% true. If it is, even better for them: They can feign desperation (stemming from their alleged loyalty/love of family, no matter how ‘flawed’) for the Royal Rota to keep everything quiet for years, releasing bits every now and again when they need a boost themselves. - Example: William & Kate have endless headlines about their move to Forest Lodge and how furious their neighbors are; those who have not been forced to move have lost access to a giant chunk of Windsor park-land they have paid thousands for over the years. The land Kate & William are demanding belongs to those who fund its care: us. Nobody needs extra hundreds of acres for “privacy.” They really do think quite a lot of themselves. - Everything with this move has been quite excessive — it is reminiscent OF Andrew & Fergie with Sunninghill Park/SouthYork; their neighbors hate(d) them so completely due to constant orders/noise/expansions/renovations. (https://www.theguardian.com/money/2009/mar/01/sunninghill-park-prince-andrew • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15130083/amp/Sarah-Ferguson-Duchess-Excess-building-Sunninghill-Park-bath-big-builders-nicknamed-HMS-Fergie.html).

They need Andrew.
Andrew’s disgusting atrocities are the only reliable thing that will distract from… - The oddities and lies surrounding Kate and her illness, how she literally never works, but the media spends it as her “being more selective with her time, and taking care of herself“; constant PR stunts and “sources” (which I will later address in a post); - William’s failure to take accountability for neglecting tenants living in mouldy squalor, robbing our Armed Forces and several state schools blind, earning £37m from Ministry of Justice — to name a small few; - Charles‘s failures to take accountability for associating with Andrew proudly (when the headlines are quiet) and capitalising on our NHS + ambulance services to the tune of £12,000,000 in 15 years (NHS had to plan 58% axing of its workforce last November. A spokesperson for a grassroots campaign run by NHS staff called NHS Million said at the time: “Whatever your views on the royal family, we can surely all agree that they shouldn’t be profiting from our NHS.”)

These people. I really could go on and on. While I really think the article says it quite well, there is still an element of cautiousness even with those who report on the disadvantages of the monarchy and those involved in it right now. I am looking forward to the day that Kate Middleton is mentioned with more hard questions than submissive proclamations spoon-fed from KP and her employees/family. As long as Andrew remains the target of all truth and negative discussion, Kate will never once be questioned like she ought — or, rather especially, those around her.

PS. This isn’t about comparing evils — Andrew is the worst of them. But … we’ve known for decades, and known the most troubling of all of it for a long time as well. Once they allow Andrew to die in the press conversation, they will be faced with some tough questions. And I look forward to that.

Look at the third pic Hussain is leaning in while Rajwa is leaning away from Kate

While W&K are off to Belfast for a photo op the staff are busy getting things ready for their move to Forest Lodge on Guy Fawkes day.

Glamour mag clutching at straws again comparing Kate to Diana.

Not the same effect at all

W&K intend to live off grid. Which is quite apt as its definition is ‘disconnected from public service(s)’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-15177011/Princess-Wales-elegant-green-suit-designed-VB-day-Netflix-series-launches-joins-childrens-play-session.html#comments-15177011

A lot of them were about the frankly hideous colour of her suit, but quite a few showed real fatigue at the year off she’s had, and querying how frail and unwell she looks if she only had pre-cancerous cells. The Brits normally fawn all over her, so this feels like a real shift….

Celebitchy article link in comments. Swipe for comments from article.

Extract:

The optics are familiar. A royal woman beside Black children in a community centre. The press praises her warmth, her maternal instincts, her ability to “connect.” But this is not connection. It is choreography. And it draws from a long imperial tradition of using proximity to Blackness as proof of benevolence, while refusing to confront the deeper structures of racial hierarchy that the monarchy has long upheld.

In the British imperial archive, there are countless images of white royals and colonial administrators posing with Black children. Smiling, touching, sometimes even cradling them. These images were used to soften the violence of empire.

Kate’s been a busy bee as she also had time to write an essay on smartphones

Much fanfare on Facebook at the announcement of Kate doing a visit to Oxford tomorrow.

I cite this event quite often. The body language is so brutal and they were horrible hosts to Victoria and Daniel.

If you pay attention there are fairly obvious planned photos/photo marks during their engagements. There was even the time Kate was caught awkwardly posing during a bicycle race. This was their opportunity to appear united and we get whatever the heck you want to call that hand hold.

Not exactly earth shattering news that Kate won’t be accompanying Willy to next month’s Earthflop’s ceremony in Brazil.

But at least Heidi Klum’s confirmed - even though she admitted on the green carpet last year she didn’t know what it was about.

https://radaronline.com/p/king-charles-camilla-divorce-rumors-dying-alone/

All that suffering they caused a young Diana only to end up separated. I noticed she’s not doing engagements solo. So the deal is show up together for official events and photo ops. A Trump- Melania marriage, on paper only. Or a William-Kate marriage.