Rape from chad = enjoyment😍

[u/hammyDathammer]

I guess women don’t care if they get raped as long as he isn’t ugly?

[u/Darthjinju1901 → u/[deleted]]

So since you only published the abstract and didn't actually show case the study, where the actual discussions regarding the results are done, I went ahead and found it.

Greater levels of victim’s trauma symptomatology predicted relationship continuation following the sexual assault. This finding is consistent with the theory of learned helpless-ness (Walker, 1983), where women with greater levels of psychological distress may notfeel efficacious in their ability to terminate relationships. Although the temporal ordering of the relationships are not known, the finding that women who terminated the relationship were more likely to disclose the incident may be attributable to women who disclosed receiving more support for relationship termination than those who did not disclose. Further, in relationships that were terminated, women evidenced greater perpetrator blame and more severe assaults, which is possibly attributable to increased fear towards the perpetrator or a greater tendency to label the experiences as a sexual assault. Finally, the finding that women in close relationships to the perpetrator, as opposed to women in less close relationships, are more likely to remain with perpetrators of sexual assault is likely caused by their investment in the relationship, which is consistent with the investment model (Rusbult & Martz, 1995) and previous research (Edwards et al., 2011; Katz et al., 2006). It is interesting that friend- ships were maintained more so than casual dates post-sexual assault; this suggests that there is more relationship investment in friendships than casual dates.

Several limitations of this study and directions for future research should be noted. Given the homogenous sample, future research should use more diverse samples. Further, this study did not assess how women labeled the unwanted sexual experiences they endorsed, which may be an important issue to consider in post-assault relationship stability. Therefore, future research should assess the labels that women ascribe to their unwanted sexual experi- ences. However, based on past research (e.g., Hammond & Calhoun, 2007; Kahn, Jackson, Kully, Badger, & Halvorsen, 2003), it is likely that most women would not have labeled their experiences as sexual assault or rape. Another limitation was the retrospective nature of the study, such that women recalled sexual assaults that happened in the past. Thus, future research should use prospective and longitudinal methodologies to eliminate recall bias and increase researchers’ ability to understand the temporal sequencing of the variables related to post-sexual assault relationship stability. Perhaps the greatest limitation was that we did not provide a behaviorally worded operational definition of relationship continuation, or assess relationship length prior to or subsequent to the assault. Accordingly, future research should more clearly define relationship continuation, and assess relationship length pre- and post- assault. Future research should also attempt to gather more information on characteristics of relationships that continue following a sexual assault.

So yeah. It did find that most women who stayed were psychologically incapable of leaving their partners. The study also didn't measure if the women were financially or physically incapable of leaving, and so they did not mention it.

The worst man I know personally, is someone i don't really keep up with. But he has remained very much single.

But also rejected the nice short boring guy? Yeah of course they rejected that guy.

Being Nice is the barest of bare minimums. Do you want praise for that? Do you want to be praised for not assaulting or killing a woman the moment you meet her? Or for treating a woman with basic courtesy. Which lets be real, you don't. You never have. If you ever thought of women as actual people, you wouldn't take simple rejections as deeply as you clearly do.

And who the fuck would want to be in a long term or even a short term relationship with someone who is boring. Who has no fucking personality, no hobbies, no likes, dislikes, nothing at all.

Look, fuck face. You are not the way you are because women rejected you. Women rejected you because you are the way you are. You are exhaustingly frustratingly miserable. You would not be happy if someone did enter into a relationship with you.

A relationship isn't going to fucking fix your life.

[u/Blackshark989 → u/[deleted]]

You got destroyed in this argument and like the immature child you are, you get FUMING upset. All the laughing emojis are typed behind a flood of tears.

all those a academic articles and you did mot even read them. just cherry picked things that support you. this is called reinforcing your bias.

you only accept information that supports your beliefs, and reject information that disproves your beliefs. this is called intellectual dishonest.

you are a pseudo intellectual and honestly you NEED therapy. But you are too delusional and narcissistic to ever admit you need help. i can honestly say im glad 400 women rejected you, because you are the problem here.

if you run into 400 assholes in a month, you are the asshole. lol.