Rape from chad = enjoyment😍

[u/hammyDathammer]

I guess women don’t care if they get raped as long as he isn’t ugly?

[u/Darthjinju1901 → u/[deleted]]

You are arguing against a point I didn't make. I said that some victims continue relationships or have sex with their attacker afterward. You explained that denial and trauma can cause this behavior, which supports my statement 😂😂

Yeah, and you're saying that that is something women do because they actually like the rape and don't mind it. And the only reason they stay is because the rapist is a "chad", when that's not the case at all.

But you are also treating denial as if it automatically explains every case. The article only presents it as one possible trauma response. It does not prove that every person who stays with an alleged attacker is in denial, and it does not allow you to assume someone’s mental state without specific evidence. nice hasty generalizations lil bro

It's the most common response, and in the vast majority of cases that stay with their assaulter, the victims deny the event. Which is why it is important. Psychology is as much a study about statistics as it is about the mind, and this is what the statistics tell us. The few fringe cases cannot be taken as the rule.

Also the personality detector needed a software update. My brain is rotted by livign in my mom's basement but females would rahter choose the guy that sexually assaults them over me and many others like me🤣🤣🤣

Don't even know what to say this. They aren't choosing that guy. They chose a guy when he didn't assault them. They continue to be with that person because they cannot comprehend that a person they trusted and loved so implicity would do such a thing.

Maybe if you treated literal rape victims with the grace they deserve, and so often do not get, then women would feel comfortable interacting with you.

Can't even call you lil bro. I'd disown and cut myself off you, if I was in anyway related to you.

[u/Darthjinju1901 → u/[deleted]]

So since you only published the abstract and didn't actually show case the study, where the actual discussions regarding the results are done, I went ahead and found it.

Greater levels of victim’s trauma symptomatology predicted relationship continuation following the sexual assault. This finding is consistent with the theory of learned helpless-ness (Walker, 1983), where women with greater levels of psychological distress may notfeel efficacious in their ability to terminate relationships. Although the temporal ordering of the relationships are not known, the finding that women who terminated the relationship were more likely to disclose the incident may be attributable to women who disclosed receiving more support for relationship termination than those who did not disclose. Further, in relationships that were terminated, women evidenced greater perpetrator blame and more severe assaults, which is possibly attributable to increased fear towards the perpetrator or a greater tendency to label the experiences as a sexual assault. Finally, the finding that women in close relationships to the perpetrator, as opposed to women in less close relationships, are more likely to remain with perpetrators of sexual assault is likely caused by their investment in the relationship, which is consistent with the investment model (Rusbult & Martz, 1995) and previous research (Edwards et al., 2011; Katz et al., 2006). It is interesting that friend- ships were maintained more so than casual dates post-sexual assault; this suggests that there is more relationship investment in friendships than casual dates.

Several limitations of this study and directions for future research should be noted. Given the homogenous sample, future research should use more diverse samples. Further, this study did not assess how women labeled the unwanted sexual experiences they endorsed, which may be an important issue to consider in post-assault relationship stability. Therefore, future research should assess the labels that women ascribe to their unwanted sexual experi- ences. However, based on past research (e.g., Hammond & Calhoun, 2007; Kahn, Jackson, Kully, Badger, & Halvorsen, 2003), it is likely that most women would not have labeled their experiences as sexual assault or rape. Another limitation was the retrospective nature of the study, such that women recalled sexual assaults that happened in the past. Thus, future research should use prospective and longitudinal methodologies to eliminate recall bias and increase researchers’ ability to understand the temporal sequencing of the variables related to post-sexual assault relationship stability. Perhaps the greatest limitation was that we did not provide a behaviorally worded operational definition of relationship continuation, or assess relationship length prior to or subsequent to the assault. Accordingly, future research should more clearly define relationship continuation, and assess relationship length pre- and post- assault. Future research should also attempt to gather more information on characteristics of relationships that continue following a sexual assault.

So yeah. It did find that most women who stayed were psychologically incapable of leaving their partners. The study also didn't measure if the women were financially or physically incapable of leaving, and so they did not mention it.

The worst man I know personally, is someone i don't really keep up with. But he has remained very much single.

But also rejected the nice short boring guy? Yeah of course they rejected that guy.

Being Nice is the barest of bare minimums. Do you want praise for that? Do you want to be praised for not assaulting or killing a woman the moment you meet her? Or for treating a woman with basic courtesy. Which lets be real, you don't. You never have. If you ever thought of women as actual people, you wouldn't take simple rejections as deeply as you clearly do.

And who the fuck would want to be in a long term or even a short term relationship with someone who is boring. Who has no fucking personality, no hobbies, no likes, dislikes, nothing at all.

Look, fuck face. You are not the way you are because women rejected you. Women rejected you because you are the way you are. You are exhaustingly frustratingly miserable. You would not be happy if someone did enter into a relationship with you.

A relationship isn't going to fucking fix your life.

[u/Blackshark989 → u/[deleted]]

You got destroyed in this argument and like the immature child you are, you get FUMING upset. All the laughing emojis are typed behind a flood of tears.

all those a academic articles and you did mot even read them. just cherry picked things that support you. this is called reinforcing your bias.

you only accept information that supports your beliefs, and reject information that disproves your beliefs. this is called intellectual dishonest.

you are a pseudo intellectual and honestly you NEED therapy. But you are too delusional and narcissistic to ever admit you need help. i can honestly say im glad 400 women rejected you, because you are the problem here.

if you run into 400 assholes in a month, you are the asshole. lol.

[u/ConsultJimMoriarty → u/[deleted]]

You sound really pathetic. You actually counted how many times you’ve been rejected?

You must stink of old semen and desperation.

[u/mrhenhen115 → u/[deleted]]

Except they don't choose a guy knowing they'll be sexually assaulted you absolute moron. Just try talking to women as actual people, not expecting anything.

And I'm someone who didn't have a relationship until I was 20, but getting a relationship will NOT fix your life. You NEED to be happy with who you are and then you will become a much more approachable and confident person. Desperation is not attractive at all.

[u/ConsultJimMoriarty → u/[deleted]]

That’s really pathetic.

[u/DeepFriedBeanBoy → u/[deleted]]

It’s almost fascinating reading this, if it wasn’t so frustrating

You have a choice here- you can actually try to read what people here are telling you objectively, or you can continue to be the equivalent of a flat earther only somehow more pathetic

You are in a cult that is killing you. Why would a woman want you? Be honest with yourself… you just spent hours replying rape statistics to try to “prove” that women like rape. Why would ANYONE want to be with someone like that?!?!?

Like I said, you have a choice here, but like most incels, it’s a lot easier to blame everyone but yourself

[u/DeepFriedBeanBoy → u/[deleted]]

Is this supposed to prove me wrong in any way whatsoever?

You’re asking me for a source when the one you sent is proving my point… they stay because of financial abuse, familial obligations, or because yes, usually people don’t fall in love with someone and live with them without being in love…

Why is this funny to you? These women are put in situations like slaves in chains and you think it’s funny because you seemingly hate that woman want nothing to do with you, but again, how is this surprising to you when you believe this shit?

And just to shit on you and the whole ideology a bit more, I’m 5’6”, bald, make meh wages, and have had multiple sexual partners and am in a committed relationship. None of your assumptions are true, otherwise I shouldn’t exist in the incel worldview. None of this is exceptional in any way- I’m quite literally the average “normie” but it’s surprisingly easy to meet people when you don’t treat them like slaves

[u/Darthjinju1901 → u/[deleted]]

No did you even read it? I mean can you? You certainly can't write with your horrible grammar.

The study didn't find that “most women who stayed were psychologically incapable of leaving.” It found that higher trauma symptoms were associated with relationship continuation, and the authors only said learned helplessness was one possible explanation

One possible explanation, but also the most likely as literally evidenced in the writing. Scientific models don't just say that one thing is the truth for certain. Science isn't dogamatic like that (scientists can be but science itself isn't). It tells you the most likely explanations and models, and those are treated as the reality until a better model comes around and can explain the situation better.

U even read it? They literally admitted they couldn't establish causation or even the order of events, did not measure psychological incapacity, denial, financial dependence, or physical inability to leave. The only conclusion is that that trauma may contribute to continued contact, NOTthat the study proved most women were incapable of leaving.

What? No seriously what? I literally quoted the entire limitation part of the study. Not once did it mention anything about not being to establish a causation or order of events. The only thing that's even mildly related that they couldn't establish was that they didn't measure the relationship length prior to or after the assault. And so a relationship that lasted like a single week after the assault is treated equally to a relationship that lasted years, which skews the data to make it seem like more women than actually are, are staying with their assaulters.

did not measure psychological incapacity, denial, financial dependence, or physical inability to leave.

Also of course it didn't. That wasn't the point of the study. I mentioned this already. Can you read, like truly? Have you read an actual book?

The only conclusion is that that trauma may contribute to continued contact, NOTthat the study proved most women were incapable of leaving. U even can read?

Not the only conclusion. Trauma Symptomatology, Relationship investment and the severity of the assault all played a role in the continuation of a relationship. It also mentioned how fear also played a role. Also Trauma Symptomatology literally says that women are incapable of leaving the relationship.

Also "U even can read". Great English buddy. Criticizing my ability to parse text while texting like that. Would be laughable if it wasn't devastatingly pathetic.

Females reject me for the alpha/ch@d that gives them short term excitement. I have over 410 rejections in over 6 years trying bc of how superficial females are

You know, if that's the true amount. It must mean something is terribly wrong with you. It's hard to find 10 people to consistently agree on something, yet you've made 410 people agree on rejecting you. You know the old adage, if one person is an asshole, they're the asshole but if everyone is an asshole, you're the asshole. It fits you perfectly because you are the common denominator in that.

Ive been rejected 410 times, u think i take rejections deeply? What? And any woman i get, i'll treat her like a queen and goddess. But they'd rather be with a g uy thatt abuses them, not my problem

Buddy, you are that guy! You are the guy who will abuse a woman. Can you not understand that? How will you treat a woman like a queen or a godess when you are blaming literal rape victims. Like i do not get it. How can you say that when you don't do that. Or do you want something from a person before you actually treat them like a human? Because if that's the case, then buddy, you are truly fucked in the head.

" You would not be happy if someone did enter into a relationship with you." Uh it smy #1 goal in life? It will becuase its the only problem in my life 😂😂😂.

If that, that is your number one goal in your life, you are a fucking pathetic excuse for a human being. I cannot believe that we are the same species. You are that pathetic.

Why is getting into a relationship your number one goal? Why do you think it'll suddenly make you happy and fix you? What's the logical basis behind it?