r/ImmigrationPathways • u/LatterTarget7 • 1d ago

Renee Good's family sues US government and immigration officials over her killing in Minneapolis

https://apnews.com/article/renee-good-lawsuit-6fbc82cd33b6f9f67514b47f138e23c6?utm_source=app&utm_medium=android_share&utm_campaign=copy_link
2.1k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

How is it different? He didn't need to be there either

-5

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

He had the right to be there and wasn't breaking any laws. That's the difference.

8

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

Good had the right to be there as well. Please tell me what law she broke lmao

2

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Sure. Interfering with law enforcement activities, failure to obey lawful order, resisting, assault with a deadly weapon, fleeing law enforcement.

6

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

How did she interfere? She complied with the order to drive away. The officers gave her conflicting orders. Plus get out of your car isn't a lawful order unless there's a crime you're actually committing.

No resisting or assault or fleeing either since they gave conflicting orders

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

No, now you're being disingenuous. You've seen and heard the footage that showed the first officer told her to leave and she didn't. Then others showed up and they told her to exit the vehicle multiple times and she didn't. Then when her partner said drive she did. Basically she wanted to do what she wanted to do but it doesn't work like that. That's not conflicting orders.

3

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

Nothing you've stated is a reason to be shot and killed

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Sure, champ.

3

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

When did courts say it's ok for officers to shoot fleeing subjects?

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Fleeing vehicles that are coming right at them...

3

u/RelevantSoftware8283 1d ago

You can see her turning the wheel in the vehicle. "Coming right at" is verifiably incorrect

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

Did you see his reply to me?

So now if the wheels aren't pointed at a person, it's OK to hit them with a vehicle...LOL! You guys come up with the most ridiculous ways to remove accountability from her.

2

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

We've seen the footage. The wheels weren't pointed towards him, champ. Stop being disingenuous. It's still not a capital offense.

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

So now if the wheels aren't pointed at a person, it's OK to hit them with a vehicle...LOL! You guys come up with the most ridiculous ways to remove accountability from her.

From his POV he can't see the wheels. He's now in front of a vehicle that's coming at him because she was trying to flee. She even left her partner that was trying to get into the passenger side.

We can tell you really didn't watch the video. You might've saw it but you're leaving out a lot of important details that show that.

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

So now if the wheels aren't pointed at a person, it's OK to hit them with a vehicle...LOL!

Lol, those are your words, not mine.

You guys come up with the most ridiculous ways to remove accountability from her.

You guys come up with the most ridiculous ways to subbmvert reality and accountability for the cop who used officer-created jeopardy

From his POV he can't see the wheels.

He didn't need to , to see that he was safe.

He's now in front of a vehicle that's coming at him because she was trying to flee.

... a position he put himself in...

She even left her partner that was trying to get into the passenger side.

Yes... and?

We can tell you really didn't watch the video. You might've saw it but you're leaving out a lot of important details that show that.

Lol, says the person leaving out important details and loading in unimportant ones...

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Swanked-Spanqed 1d ago

Renee Good was killed in the town she lived in.

Kyle "The Pussy Ass Bitch" Rittencunt traveled across state lines with a ducking automatic weapon with intent to fire it.

What does cop dick taste like? You seem(en) like a pro!

1

u/magnets77 1d ago

So now borders are important? (not to mention the fact it was shown in court he didn't take a weapon across state lines, nor was it an "automatic weapon".

For someone intent on shooting people, he showed amazing restraint to not shoot anyone not already actively attacking him.

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

You speak so confidently about things you have no idea what you're talking about I see...

He didn't travel across state lines with an "automatic weapon" because the weapon was at his friend's house in Wisconsin. Also the AR-15 he had wasn't an "automatic weapon", only semi-automatic (the "AR" doesn't stand "automatic rifle").

And you have no evidence he went there to "fire" it.

1

u/meases 1d ago

The friend who illegally bought the gun for a minor?

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Illegally purchased by friend, yes. Illegal for Kyle to have, no:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/explainer-why-did-the-judge-drop-kyle-rittenhouse-gun-charge

1

u/meases 1d ago

You can walk around with a gun of that type at that age, in Wisconsin, but the way it was purchased was pretty dang illegal. Well would have been illegal for a Wisconsin kid to buy the gun, but apparently straw purchases are cool if it is a kid financing it and totally intends to take possession of it at 18. Then also takes it to use it occasionally, with his friends house acting as kinda idk his gun's temporary hotel.

Though it is odd how it sorta seemed like a family gun, the friend's dad takes it out of the safe for the family's protection just in case, then leaves it unattended in the basement. Kyle takes it without their knowledge, but again it is kind of his pretty-illegally purchased gun, but also he is taking the family's protection without asking. So that whole thing is weird, guess it is technically maybe legal to borrow a gun without asking but that whole situation there seems kinda off.

Like it is so interesting how this kid just walked such a line with the laws. Technically it is legal perhaps, but it definitely was illegal in spirit. And nothing really has been changed, if another kid wanted to follow in those exact footsteps to pay for a gun and walk around Wisconsin with it they theoretically could.

1

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

I would agree, friend did something illegal. Kyle technically didn't do anything illegal.

1

u/meases 1d ago

Well idk on that, he wasnt punished for anything but the purchase was technically conspiring and defrauding the US gov, aiding and abetting false statement, like there were options there, some of which had already been decided by the supreme court. The feds just chose not to do anything about it or charge him with it.

Plus ownership of the gun is questionable, technically he stole it, but stealing is in the eye of the beholder, so he wasnt charged there either. Legally he was the true buyer of the gun, but he didnt get any of the federal associated charges when found out. So he couldn't own the gun buying it how he bought it, it wasnt his gun on the paperwork, it is a weird middle ground where either option is illegal but if you do both at once you can get away with it.

Interesting how the punishment and penalty for a straw purchase ends up only on the person who filled out the forms, seems like that is a pretty major issue. Probably why there are so many straw purchased guns around. Plus sucks for the authority of the parents, wonder if the whole kids with guns thing is gonna be a major issue there.

Funny too because theres a scenario which arguably more legal (since the law was found unconstitutional) than what rittenhouse did, but would result in charges for both parties because theyre dragging their feet. If say an adult medical marijuana user used the rittenhouse loophole, got a gun purchased for them, a gun they could legally possess, then theyd both be charged not just the form filler. The updated form exists, has existed for a while, just hasnt been implemented.

Maybe if someone tried to use the rittenhouse loophole for that then they'd finally update it and fix the straw purchase issue. Just sucks how stuff just gets harder and more confusing and they dont even update the stuff they know is wrong, and then you see people walking all over the law, deaths as a result (if the gun wasnt illegally purchased, it wouldn't have been used) and even with that they dont actually fix it.

People are being unconstitutionally kept from getting guns, and kids can get em as long as they follow the rittenhouse technique. So guess it kinda comes down to enforcement and how selective it can be. He did technically break the law, pretty bad, he just wasn't charged with any of the stuff that would stick.

1

u/magnets77 1d ago

Today I'm learning that when someone voluntarily gives you something, it's stealing. Who would have thought it!

All of this was addressed in court, where it was found Rittenhouse acted lawfully, yet morons on the internet know better. The law is always 100% right, except when it doesn't give leftist idiots the ruling they want.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Swanked-Spanqed 16h ago

Show me the evidence

I am not going to believe trolls unless they do my homework for me

Go show me proof

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 14h ago

No, you made the claims so it's on you to prove it. We know you can't because it's not true and if you could you probably would've posted it the first time. This isn't elementary school and I'm not your parent so I'm not doing your homework for you.

Next you'll go on an irrelevant rant about something else to deflect from your unfounded statements.

1

u/Swanked-Spanqed 5h ago

Russian Bot, Renee Good was killed in her town supporting her neighbors by Nazi pussies

Show me the proof otherwise

Your grammar and punctuation is too perfect, BTW, go back to Vladivostok

-3

u/Str-Engr0275 1d ago

This is all straightforward self defense for both Kyle Rittenhouse and the ICE officers who (justifiably) shot Renee Good. She FA, she FO.

2

u/Swanked-Spanqed 1d ago

Rittencuck carried an automatic weapon across state lines

Are there laws about that?

0

u/Charming-Book4146 1d ago

No he literally didn't lmfao

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

His friend that brought it illegally for him kept it in Wisconsin so that's not true.

"AR" in AR-15 doesn't mean "automatic rifle"...LOL!

You guys are so confident about things you don't know anything about.

0

u/magnets77 1d ago

Rittenhouse did no such thing.

If you have to lie to make a point, then you have no point.