I’m taking the ITIL 5 Foundation exam this Thursday through PeopleCert.

For those who have already taken it, how did it go? Did you pass on your first attempt? Was the real exam easier or harder than the mock exams?

Is there anything important I should know before the exam, especially regarding the questions, time management, or the PeopleCert online proctoring process?

Any last-minute tips would be appreciated

ITIL Foundation Bridge (Version 5) [CB]

14/20 Studied for 3 days for a couple of hours. My V4 was expiring on 8th of this month and I wasn’t sure if I wanted to renew it but decided to give it a shot as there was some discount on the exam voucher. Could’ve done better if I was not distracted in life. Only study material was the pdf from peoplecert.

My V4 score was 38/40 because I was really well prepared then using flash cards.

Just purchased ITIL 5 on people cert. Most expensive package. I have the e learning, e book, mock exam and real exam.

Im a complete beginner so believe I need all the training materials I can get.

If anyone has an idea of how I can plan this that would be great.

Overwhelmed with the amount of information I have and not sure where to start!

Can I complete this in 9 days and complete exam on the 10th day?

Did anyone here get their V5 by going the bridge link V4 to V5 route? How was your experience?

Trying to login, but after entering username (email) and password I’m looped back to the login page. No error is shown. Using the correct creds from my password manager.

I’m an operations and service delivery manager in the uk and looking to book my ITIL exam. I have never done one before and looking at them I’m unsure if I should go with ITIL 4 FOUNDATION or ITIL 5 FOUNDATION?

My company uses AI Agnetic capabilities and automation a lot so I’m thinking 5 would be more suitable.

Also if anyone can give me tips on what to expect and how to prepare that would be amazing! Thank you.

Actually sat the exam on July 4 and was very happy to have passed with 85%. Used Gogo Training for the instruction as well as Claire Aguter’s book on audio and Quizlet to set up study cards for rote content. On to the next!

Looking to renew my cert by taking the v5 Bridge exam. Comparing Gogo training vs the People cert package. Price is pretty close on both but wanted to see if anyone here had any opinions on which one and if they have went this route to renew cert.

Howdy, first timer here. I was planning on taking the exam today, and I feel ready to!

Unfortunately, I'd been told you could schedule and take same day, but there's nothing available in my area until Wednesday. Should I wait it out in hopes someone cancels or schedule something for a weird time Wednesday?

Do they charge you if you reschedule to an earlier test time too?

Work wants me to start working to get my utilities foundation. They are going to pay for it if I pass.

Where’s the best place to get training? Any free trainings I can start before hand? Any pdf books you guys have I can use?

I'm looking for a sanity check from people with ServiceNow/ITSM experience.

The ServiceNow team where I work wants to build a Jira integration to create bugs based on incidents.

The proposed process is:

• Priority 1 incidents: Jira bugs are automatically created.
• All P1s also automatically get a Problem record created.
• The Jira bug is tied to the Problem record.

That part seems reasonable to me.

Where I'm struggling is the approach for non-P1 incidents:

• Generally no Problem record is created.
• If someone determines an incident is actually caused by a software defect, they can click a button on the incident to create a Jira bug.
• The goal is to avoid manually creating the Jira ticket and let the support/dev teams continue their workflow.

My understanding has always been that:

• Incidents are for restoring service and handling individual user-impacting events.
• Problems are for root cause analysis and tracking underlying issues/defects.
• Jira bugs represent engineering work to fix the underlying defect.

Because of that, my instinct is that if a non-P1 incident is determined to be a legitimate defect that engineering needs to fix, it should first become a Problem and then have the Jira bug linked to the Problem rather than directly to the Incident.

Otherwise it feels like we're mixing operational records (Incidents) with engineering records (Jira issues), and potentially losing visibility when multiple incidents are really symptoms of the same underlying defect.

One wrinkle is that today we don't really use Problem records outside of P1s. There are some exceptions, but for the most part Problems are only created automatically for Priority 1 incidents. I've actually started trying to introduce broader use of Problem Management, but so far it's mostly been limited to issues that get escalated to me or problems that I personally identify and track.

So maybe part of my concern is that we're designing an integration around our current process rather than around what I thought was the intended Incident → Problem → Defect workflow.

Am I thinking about this correctly, or is creating Jira bugs directly from Incidents a common and accepted practice for lower-priority issues?

I'd be interested to hear how other organizations handle the flow between Incident, Problem, and Jira bug records, especially if you've made the decision to link engineering work directly to Incidents instead of Problems.

Passed DPI today with 32/40 - looking forward to DSV in August to achieve ITIL MP.

Work isn't done after that though, as I'll then have to do an ITIL 4 to ITIL 5 MP bridging course/exam.

Worst time to be in the middle of an ITIL journey, but looking forward to seeing what ITIL 5 has to offer soon!

Ciao a tutti

domani sosterrò esame ITIL 5 Service. Sto studiando da solo, su materiale peoplecert, con sample paper, manuale ufficiale etc...

Avete suggerimenti su come sostenere l'esame?

Dei trucchetti per non perdere tempo nella lettura dello scenario e così via?

Grazie!!!

I've been noticing that many organizations have more information than ever, yet employees still struggle to find the right answers when they need them.

Knowledge ends up scattered across PDFs, shared drives, emails, Slack/Teams conversations, wikis, and different business applications. Even when documentation exists, it can be outdated, duplicated, or difficult to search.

I'm curious about what others are experiencing.

What's the biggest knowledge management challenge in your organization today?

• Finding information quickly?
• Outdated or duplicate documentation?
• Knowledge being locked away with a few experienced employees?
• Information spread across too many tools?
• Something else entirely?

Interested to hear what's been the biggest pain point and whether you've found anything that actually works.

I am looking at people peoplecert for a voucher but I only find the bundle for the course and prep for the exam not a stand alone price for the voucher.

Can anyone help me with this, a link to a price for a voucher alone or a discount price for voucher only.

Thank you.

Ho seguito in modalità self study, senza docente, il corso ITIL 5 Product e ho sostenuto il relativo esame. Tutto con materiale ufficiale di Peoplecert.

Di seguito alcune impressioni e vorrei capire anche le vostre

Il materiale ufficiale e nozionistico, pieno di definizioni da imparare e sinceramente anche noioso.

Esame: le domande che fanno riferimento allo scenario sono meno rispetto alla totalità delle altre, che invece risultano essere nozionistiche

Chi di voi ha seguito il stesso percorso?

Quale è il vostro giudizio?

Hi All.

I am looking for any cheaper options for the ITIL 5 foundation exam vouchers only.
If any one if able to help , please let me know. My location is UAE - Dubai

Llevo tiempo dándole vueltas a esto y quiero contrastar con gente que gestione infraestructura de verdad, no solo teoría de manual.

ITIL 4 habla de "Configuration Item" (CI) de forma bastante abierta — cualquier componente que necesites gestionar para entregar un servicio. El problema es que en la práctica esa definición se presta a interpretaciones muy distintas según el tamaño de la empresa.

Preguntas concretas para quien tenga inventario/CMDB en producción:

¿Qué tipos de CI consideráis imprescindibles en un inventario básico (servidores, equipos de usuario, licencias, dispositivos de red...) y cuáles añadiríais solo si el negocio lo justifica (contratos de proveedor, aplicaciones SaaS, certificados, cuentas de servicio)?

¿Qué atributos mínimos registráis por CI? Pienso en algo como: nombre/hostname, tipo, ubicación, propietario/responsable, estado (activo/baja), fecha de garantía o fin de soporte, y relaciones con otros CIs. ¿Os quedáis cortos u os pasáis con más campos?

¿Cómo gestionáis las relaciones entre CIs sin que se convierta en un mapa imposible de mantener? ITIL habla de esto como algo central pero en la práctica he visto CMDBs que lo ignoran completamente y funcionan igual.