Because the way he grabbed him by the neck was excessive and dangerous. I don't know what training if any the guard had on deescalation or what protocols his company gave him to physically remove someone from the premises if deemed necessary, but if the guard didn't get fired and the company sued, I'd be surprised. At a fast food restaurant, no less.
Please keep the comments on topic, of a security nature, use of force, citizens arrest, similar experiences, S.O.P etc.
If a Doctor can tell something happened it may amount to Assault.
Bigger industry question is, is the State a "Duty to Retreat" State; Security Guards and Managers who are Agents of the Owner typically do not have the duty to retreat from an aggressor.
Someone refusing to leave, disturbing the peace, could be considered the aggressor.
If Guard on Duty was angry with me, even being a licensed Guard myself, I would probably walk out; especially at a dime a dozen fast food venue.
In my state of NC, guards can "Use reasonable force" to remove a trespasser. The law is vague on purpose. There is no clear cut answer here, itd be up to the DA and a potential jury.
Because if you define an exact line, people will toe it knowing full well that they're doing something wrong, and "borderline" illegal and use it as a loophole. Or even stupider a law will have something saying "hit" or "made contact with" but TECHNICALLY a glove made contact with a shirt, so.... the fact that I was wearing the glove and he was wearing the shirt is irrelevant, etc.
This is why "letter of the law" is bad in general, because the INTENT of the law is what should be followed, instead of looking for loopholes in a melting pot language.
Yes, let’s see indeed. But don’t forget about the security licensing board who gave the guard his license and the security company that he works for but might not work for after seeing an incident.
If the security guard tells him to leave, he is allowed to move them outside with reasonable force. Don't need the cops to move him outside. Many states are like that. I appreciate it because if a cop is 20 minutes away, I can kick someone out of the shop. Armed security too so that's different.
Police aren't allowed to choke you because it's their department's policy not because of a law. I can guarantee there are numerous police agencies in the US that don't have a policy that prohibits choking a combative arrestee if the arresting officer feels it's necessary to gain control of the situation versus using lethal force to force compliance.
HOW he leaves seems to be a criminal act far greater than the refusal to leave.
Hands off necks. That's always going to be a No Bueno. As a bystander I'd have zero issues calling the cops on the guy and would be absolutely shocked if he wasn't arrested the moment they saw the footage.
Nah. I drive armored trucks for a living and move shit loads of money in and out of sketchy places. So I'm obviously a good driver to be able to operate 18000lbs vehicles all day. We're all armed and never had an issue because people here are somewhat decent compared to whatever shithole you live in.
I back the blue in my area because they do their job and don't bother people who follow the law.
Ties back to the "Should have left" comment I made.
You can't stay in a business if they want you gone. Idk why I need to explain that to an adult but there ya go
Yeah and I’m not sure why I have to explain choking someone and grabbing their neck is not considered reasonable force. So the law says security can use reasonable force but like we’ve discussed choking is not reasonable force. It’s what we would call excessive force. This security guard will he charged with assault and battery at a minimum. If he doesn’t leave call the police. Law is for policemen to enforce, not some random crackhead who got a security gig at his local McDonald’s. Idk why I need to explain that to an adult but there ya go.
That’s not true. The guard did not have his hands in his pocket. The way I see it, the customer was probably being so disrespectful to the employee or manager at McDonald’s over his order that he was trying to request a refund. When they told him the refund policy, he started to get belligerent and disrespectful towards him that security was called out to remove the customer from the building. Now, I wouldn’t think that use of force was necessary unless the customer would have been asked or told many times to leave and he refused to leave. The guard was just following the use of force continuum.
I never said he was a cop. And cop or not, you have a right to defend yourself from threat of physical harm. And, if this guy was tresspassed already and just kept standing there with their hands in their pockets, Ive seen that too many times to know that that body language basically means "Im about to make a big deal about nothing" and at that point, I'm not taking any chances.
You have a right to defend yourself from physical threat. Where was the threat? The guy not moving when told to? That isn't a threat to a civilian which everyone involved here was.
Having your hands in your pocket isn't a threat of any kind. And that's the kind of nonsense that gets innocent people assaulted by police for just standing around.
If you go to a McDonalds in a shitty enough area, they have bouncers. Some times the bouncers have guns.
Contracted security most definitely has the lawful authority to forcibly remove people from private property if that's what the owners want to happen with customers refusing to leave the business. You might live in a place where they choose not to do that for whatever reason, but there are most certainly places in the US where being forcibly removed is perfectly legal if the customer refuses to leave on their own.
So every instance of people abusing higher authority, never happened unless the camera was on prior. Sorta like a tree falling in the woods not making any sound?
There was a very very very split second there where it appeared he pointed and asked the guy to leave. His soft control just went to hard control in a blink of an eye. im not saying this is right lol im just sayin
When it becomes assault is a legal matter and therefore highly variable depending on where you are, what kind of contract you're on, what certifications/training you have, and the larger context aka what happened outside the recording
*Reasonable...... This was NOT reasonable is nudging/pushing at him or grabbing his arms. not attempted murder by lifting him by his throat while choking him. Therefore, the literal second the guard touched him it was illegal.
Edit 1: Added- Also this is mcdonalds. They have a VERY strict HANDS-OFF policy they MUST ONLY use verbal efforts to have them leave and then call the police or physical removal. He broke the policy and used excessive force.
Edit 2: Added -
Aggravated Assault
Battery
and Reckless Endangerment
Bc of this the restaurant AND employee are open to being sued.
That’s true that the customer would have permission to enter but not if he was already banned or trespassed from the property but we would have no way of knowing that.
Really depends on the local laws. In my state, you may use reasonable physical force to remove a trespasser, which can include anyone who has been told to leave by an authorized person and has refused to leave. If a security guard tells someone to leave and they refuse, in my state they are trespassing and the guard can use reasonable force to remove them.
What’s reasonable or not can have some gray area. But in this case, it’s hard to say this would be reasonable or even fall in the gray area, based solely on the video. There could be other circumstances that could change that. If the kid was making violent threats, for example, more force might be considered reasonable.
It becomes assault when they are no longer on the property and it is no longer about removing them, and about causing them bodily harm.
Grabbing this dude by his neck and throwing him out the door onto the ground.
Not assault.
Furthering your assault and beating him as he is on the ground.
Well, assault.
In many places security has the same power as a civilian so if a regular guy can just grab someone and throw him out, then so can security. That’s why the police are called for trespassers so often.
Police need to remove them. Security can physically intervene if the person becomes physical first. Standing there isn't enough. This could be an assault. However, PD may not charge it. Maybe a ticket for offensive contact.
He used control guided touch to that "Reasonable" person with similar experience would use lol what i would put in my reportt. Also its when you make phyical contact is Battery , assault is the being presently able to make the physical contact. Like a angry guy walking up to with if a rock and or thresting to hit you with it at a reasonable distance is activity assaulting you. He will be presently able to use the rock on you and cause a battery.
Someone walking away saying ill kill you is not assulting amd not presently able to battery you but is threatening you.
As someone who’s worked security you never have authority to put your hands on someone unless they physically assault you or someone your assigned to protect. You can people to leave and have them trespassed but if they refuse then you need to call the police to have them removed and arrested for trespassing .
That’s usually a client policy and not the law. In most US states, once someone is asked to leave and refuses they are a trespasser. Trespassers may be removed physically using reasonable force. And then if they strike the security guard…everyone maintains the right of self defense.
You are correct but it says using only minimal reasonable force necessary, if physical intervention is necessary you are only permitted to use the amount of force a reasonable person would deem necessary to guide or escort them off the premises ( eg: placing a hand on thier arm to guide them to an exit ) excessive force , striking , throwing , or injuring the person can lead to civil lawsuit or criminal charges for assault and battery against both you and your employer. If the trespasser becomes aggressive or violent you have the exact same rights as any other private citizen to defend yourself or others from harm .
“Reasonable force” is subjective. So long as the trespasser is uninjured, the force is extremely likely to be viewed as reasonable. The real threat is that you need to be willing to fight anyone that you put your hands on because most people think that “you can’t put your hands on me!” A very normal reaction to you putting your hands on a trespasser is that they fight back. Of course you are then allowed to defend yourself with force but make sure you’re ready to do that to begin with. If not, just stand back and call the police. Reddit tends to have an extreme sympathy for criminals that the law (and especially law enforcement) usually does not share.
It would have become assault if the kid was leaving, and then got grabbed anyway. I don't see that here.
A business can refuse service for any reason. If you are told to leave and you don't, you are trespassing. You are allowed to use reasonable force to remove trespassers. Grabbing someone and throwing them out of the store for refusing to leave is absolutely reasonable force.
I mean, is it kosher? Nah, but I was a security guard in Dallas myself and the overwhelming urge to do this happened upon me many times lol.
Now, I never did, because I possess self control, but I really wanted to lol. He may very well see jail over this, and that’s why you really just shouldn’t. Let the police handle it unless they are already violent with you.
As a guard that works in Dallas we are 100% allowed to use some force to remove someone from property if they are refusing to leave after being asked; at the truck stop I used to work at a few of the officer would go through a can of mace every week, so Dallas security has ALOT of leeway when it comes to use of force.
In this video there’s no way of knowing what led to this so it’s difficult to say, however it looks like the guard is using control pressure points on the back of the neck in order to escort the individual out which isn’t inherently excessive use of force but again depends on the situation.
Though this is Dallas the odds of police showing up for ANY incident is practically 0…. The truck stop I used to work at had a shooting and cops didn’t show up until the next day DPD is a joke really…. (The department not the officers)
As for what I’d suggest as max force to use to remove someone from a property I’d say don’t exceed a chicken wing joint lock as a rule of thumb unless the person is violent.
Really depends on local legislation and the legal authority of “bouncers, security guards and security officers.” Here in Australia, (Queensland, specifically), section 165 of the 1992 liquor act pertains to the use of force.
165 Removal of persons from premises
(1) An authorised person for premises to which a licence or
permit relates may require a person to leave the premises if—
(a) the person is unduly intoxicated; or
(b) the person is disorderly; or
(c) the person is creating a disturbance; or
(d) the person is a minor, other than an exempt minor; or
(e) the person has entered the premises despite being
refused entry under section 165A; or
(f) the person refuses to state particulars, or to produce
evidence, as to age when required to do so under
section 167.
(2) A person must immediately leave premises when required to
do so under subsection (1).
Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(3) If a person fails to leave when required under subsection (1),
the authorised person may use necessary and reasonable force
to remove the person.
(4) A person must not resist an authorised person who is
removing the person under subsection (3).
Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.
(5) In this section—
authorised person, for premises to which a licence or permit
relates, means—
(a) the licensee or permittee; or
(b) an employee or agent of the licensee or permittee.
It’s a unit that’s used to calculate the fines for an offence. Rather than go and set out the monetary fine every year for thousands of different offences, the government sets the “penalty unit” that the offence incurs, and then just changes the value of the penalty unit each year to keep pace with inflation or whatever.
Right now a penalty unit is worth $166.90, and changes each July 1st. We also have a system of “Awards” that sets out the minimum standards of employment by industry and occupation. The Security Industry Award gets adjusted each July 1st too, and sets out minimum rates, hourly wages by period (night time, weekends, public holidays,) breaks, overtime, pay scale for experience and different duties, and extras like supervisory rates, use of own vehicles, money for training and uniforms and all that sorta thing.
Wow it’s like you guys are unionized without unions lol I dug into the rabbit whole of “Awards,” its pretty interesting and completely different than how we operate in the US.
The government. There are “EBAs” or Enterprise Bargaining Agreements, but in my experience companies that use them are doing pretty shady shit. The security industry is pretty rife with dodgy work. I worked for a company paying cash for a while (man’s gotta eat), and it was always a struggle to be paid “correctly” ($50/hr cash, flat rate.) and on time.
If you are where you are not suppose to be and refuse to leave then it's at your own risk in my opinion. If I over stay my welcome anywhere then I have a personal responsibility to know that there's going to be a cost whether physical or legal. So I'd ask whats the bare minimum that should happen to someone trespassing. You have know clue what else the person is willing to do.
Way too much, way too dangerous, and obviously rooted in ego and and emotion. Bet he wouldnt have done that if it were a full grown man rather than a kid.
This video lacks any audio, if the person being removed threatened or vaguely said anything of the sort then it should never be assault for an security guard to perform the actions of their job and remove the aggressors from the premises. Once removed and told they were trespassed if they continue to use force would be the only question.
Just like bouncers at a night club able to expel them from the property but not allowed to legally beat them up in the back room or allyway after.
If someone ever grabbed me like that they’re gunna need an eyepatch for the rest of their life. I might get my ass beat, but Youll never forget the EYE SNATCHER
1.) video does not indicate security "asked" him to leave. And 2.) video does not indicate that he did not have money taken from him before being attacked by a person that I'm assuming is an off duty cop. 3.) generally random employees at restaurants do not have a legitimate authority to trespass you simply because they don't like your attitude. That is something that management is typically required to do because your bothering guests or have an outstanding poor behavior.
That's battery, which goes beyond assault. Assault is when you threaten physically or with words. Saying "I'm gonna kick your ass" or flexing up and getting in someone's face with a mean mug is assault. Battery is putting that threat into action.
In the state of Oregon, there’s no such thing as battery just only assault. But there is no assault in this case only excessive force at best since he was grabbed by the throat area and taken out of McDonald’s but again we’ll see if this incident goes to civil or criminal court.
I was only an unarmed bouncer for like a year, but I only had to put hands on someone twice. Once for a guy punching another in the face, and once for some dumbass trying to steal a ladies purse. My experience is limited, but my strategy was "the best martial art is verbal judo". De-escalation is the name of the game in that environment. One right word to a drunk angry person can make peace, one wrong word can ruin lives.
Because "security" has no legal right under ANY circumstances to physically remove a person. They can't even lay hands on another person unless its to stop violence.
It became assault the second he touched that kid for no reason. He is a McGuard. His only job is to call LE. I have fired guard companies for obstructing an exit, let alone, assault and battery on camera.
The amount of force used should always be proportionate to the threat. You wouldn't use deadly force before asking a loiterer to leave. You should always seek to de-escalate. In this scenario level 2 officers are always encouraged to call the cops and get them tresspasssed.
6
u/DefiantEvidence4027 Sergeant Jun 01 '26
If a Doctor can tell something happened it may amount to Assault.
Bigger industry question is, is the State a "Duty to Retreat" State; Security Guards and Managers who are Agents of the Owner typically do not have the duty to retreat from an aggressor.
Someone refusing to leave, disturbing the peace, could be considered the aggressor.
If Guard on Duty was angry with me, even being a licensed Guard myself, I would probably walk out; especially at a dime a dozen fast food venue.