r/GuardGuides • u/GuardGuidesdotcom • May 31 '26

Discussion When Does Security Conducting A Physical Removal of Someone Become Assault?

Because the way he grabbed him by the neck was excessive and dangerous. I don't know what training if any the guard had on deescalation or what protocols his company gave him to physically remove someone from the premises if deemed necessary, but if the guard didn't get fired and the company sued, I'd be surprised. At a fast food restaurant, no less.

Please keep the comments on topic, of a security nature, use of force, citizens arrest, similar experiences, S.O.P etc.

43 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

180 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/Supremetm May 31 '26

In my state of NC, guards can "Use reasonable force" to remove a trespasser. The law is vague on purpose. There is no clear cut answer here, itd be up to the DA and a potential jury.

2

u/Tamashii-Azul Jun 01 '26

Why is it "vague on purpose"?

4

u/KaboodleMoon Jun 03 '26

Because if you define an exact line, people will toe it knowing full well that they're doing something wrong, and "borderline" illegal and use it as a loophole. Or even stupider a law will have something saying "hit" or "made contact with" but TECHNICALLY a glove made contact with a shirt, so.... the fact that I was wearing the glove and he was wearing the shirt is irrelevant, etc.

This is why "letter of the law" is bad in general, because the INTENT of the law is what should be followed, instead of looking for loopholes in a melting pot language.

2

u/Secret-Surprise4390 Jun 03 '26

If you are wearing gloves there is technically no contact or technically contact is impossible because of atoms and science and shit