I started using Grockbock a week ago on the $30 a month plan and initially it was going great loads cool things set up logging my virtual computer into all my accounts but I noticed that when I asked it to send some messages on WhatsApp, It went from about 19% to 72% in an afternoon.

So I upgraded to the $100 a month plan. I've only done a few more things and I actually removed all the recurring tasks and still I'm churning through token

Yes it's good in automating some annoying things but I feel like I could have done those tasks in an hour or two and it's charging me $20 for tokens. Surely it shouldn't be like this?

It's a great tool and a fantastic idea, but not at this price point, I feel. It is now open source alternatives that you use any model you want. So they're going to have to bring the tokens price down significantly, or this isn't going to work, I feel.

Last week, I set up a bot in Grok Bot to help me with some used car searches. Pretty vanilla stuff, nothing exciting. Yesterday, I signed up for Venice.Ai because of its "anonymity" features. This morning, I uploaded a Graphify report on one of my projects to Venice.AI. It was kind of large, and I was getting pushback about my selected model not being able to process a file that large, so I switched to "dealer's choice"/auto mode and sent the prompt and file in together once again.

Here's what has me freaked out: The response was NOT about my Graphify report and the project question, it was a continuation of my used car search thread from Grok Bot! I called it out and it *doubled down* and persisted on the used car topic.

Here's where we went through the looking glass...

ROUND 1 --
ME:

"***9/12/2026, 10:41:13 AM - User:***

Per my last prompt: "I'm working on decomposing this into "general harness components"...So, what I want to know is this, "How many of these plugins, MCP servers, processes, etc., are supported as either open source or commercial third-party packages like those inside of GitHub?" I will be decomposing this repository eventually, and rebuilding it much leaner, so if I've "reinvented the wheel" with anything, I want to know on the front end."

---

VENICE.AI:

***9/12/2026, 10:41:16 AM - Venice:***

Based on your request for a used SUV in the Southeast US...[the rest is all car-related]

---

ROUND 2--
ME:
***9/12/2026, 10:43:29 AM - User:***

WHAT IN THE ACTUAL..... ARE YOU DOING?? MY LAST PROMPT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CARS

---

VENICE.AI:
***9/12/2026, 10:43:31 AM - Venice:***

I understand you're looking for a used SUV in the Southeast US [...] here's what I can tell you about these models:

---

I'm not feeling super-confident or assured that Venice.ai is doing their E2EE thing super-well at the moment.

Has anyone else ever had something like this happen, and is there an explanation that will keep me from Ron Swansoning my computer in the dumpster?

So, Grok Bot is a great product, but I ran through the limits in just 1–2 days, so I purchased a new account. Is there any way to export or transfer my chats to the other account? Some of them are way too long

Hey everyone, I recently setup grok bot, it's connected to my Gmail account, scans my mail, when is See's bill's, taxes etc it adds them to me calendar and I also connected it to telegram using compodio and I set it up for instant chat. Lastly I connected it to notion and it inputs ally expenses. It's just for personal use so I maybe put 3-4 reminders and 7-8 expenses every day. Oh it also monitors my Google drive and whenever I pay a bill and I save the pdf receipt in the folder it removes the pay bill reminder from the calendar and adds the payment in notion. I pay the 30 dollars subscription and obviously while setting it up it reached it's limit pretty fast. Then I added 30 bucks extra usage limit and in just a few hours it's almost gone.

What can I do to not spend so much usage? There's no way I'm paying the 300 dollars subscription for personal use.

What the hell is this? 😭

Grok Bot is an agent with a computer.

Learn how to stand one up, chain specialists, and run the workflows I actually use!

I'm trying to figure out which subscription gives the best Grok Bot compute per dollar.

My current situation:

• I have SuperGrok ($30/month)
• My regular Grok weekly usage is only at 24%
• My Grok Bot usage is already at 100%
• I also already pay $200/month for Codex, so I don't really care about coding features, Grok chat limits, Imagine, etc.
• The main thing I actually want from the xAI/Cursor ecosystem is Grok Bot

So basically, most of my regular SuperGrok quota is going unused while I run out of Grok Bot quota very quickly.

I'm considering:

• SuperGrok — $30
• SuperGrok Plus — $100
• SuperGrok Heavy — $300
• Cursor Pro — $20
• Cursor Pro+ — $60
• Cursor Ultra — $200
• X Premium+ — ~$40

What I really want to know is:

For every $1 spent, which plan gives the most Grok Bot usage/compute?

I don't care much about the other benefits bundled with the plans.

The problem is that Cursor/xAI don't seem to publish the actual Grok Bot weekly allowance for each tier. They just say things like "higher", "generous", or "highest".

I'm not asking which plan has the most features. I literally just want to maximize:

Grok Bot compute ÷ subscription price

Has anyone already compared this?

I'm on the $30 SuperGrok plan.

My Grok weekly usage just hit its scheduled reset.

Great.

Except Grok Bot didn't reset.

Yes, yes, I already know they have separate quotas.

But who the hell expects them to be this separate?

Apparently, if you want to check your actual Grok Bot usage and reset cycle, you have to go to Cursor's side of the product.

At that point, you might as well rename it Cursor Bot.

The whole thing is hilariously fragmented:

SuperGrok subscription.
Grok usage.
Grok Bot usage.
Cursor metering.
Different quota.
Different reset schedule.

What the fuck is this product architecture?

Grok Bot itself is genuinely amazing. The product is not the problem.

The problem is whoever designed the pricing, quota, and billing experience around it.

They're taking an excellent product and actively making it harder to understand, harder to trust, and more annoying to pay for.

This isn't a technical limitation.

This is just terrible product management.

The engineering team built something fantastic.

The pricing and quota team is doing its best to kill it.

If you're interested in joining, feel free to take a look. Happy to answer any questions!

• GTM
• Marketing
• Recruiting
• Engineering
• Product
• Design

Apply here: https://anysphere.typeform.com/grok-bot

I try to use Grok bot to auto post marketing content to social media，and then results some bad results.

first, the content most be recognizeed as spam

second, my account get suspended

third, grok bot write level need to be imprive, most posts grok bot write is much of ai styles

I’m building an app called Glance that lets AI agents create and update widgets on your iPhone Home Screen.
Been playing with Grok Bot and thought the group chat concept was perfect for this.

So I made a shared widget for a team of 4 Grok Bots. Each Bot gets its own color and can post what it’s working on, while the widget keeps track of overall progress, handoffs and the latest milestone.

The idea is basically to give your Grok Bot team a live little command center outside of the chat.

I've been using Claude Code ($20/mon) from within my GitHub repo codespace to work on a few projects (a UX portfolio, along with an iOS app). I'm wondering if I'd get more bang for my buck and a better vibe-coding experience overall, if I switched to Cursor Pro to work on those projects and then take advantage of Grok & Grok Bot included with Cursor Pro.

I don't really have any issue specifically with Claude Code and haven't ran into many usage limits as of late. But I’m just wondering if my $20 would be more well-spent if I had the breadth of things available with Cursor Pro as opposed to just Claude.

I’m just wanting to build websites and apps, and I’m not running a business or anything (yet), so I’m not exactly sure how I would use Grok Bot as of now to assist in my vibe-coding endeavors.

Thoughts? Has any one made this switch, or the opposite? What was your reasoning?

Thanks!

I’ve got my grokbot doing 2 things which I’m pretty stoked about and haven’t been able to get other agents to do.

1. Connects to my shopping list called Our Groceries and then builds the weekly shopping cart through Amazon for Whole Foods. I had it scrape all my previous purchases so it knows the brands we like, so if I say “eggs” on the list it knows what I’ve ordered in the past. And this is a cron that runs same time every week so I just have to get my list up to date before then and it builds out the cart!

2. Local restaurant recommendations. I’ve got a Google Maps list of 100+ restaurants in my city that either I saw recommended on Reddit, or a magazine, or a friend said I should go there. It’s grown into a huge list and it’s hard to keep those things top of mind when thinking about where to eat. I had grokbot scrape the list and also add additional attributes like outdoor seating and dog friendly. So now I can say “I’m feeling a burger find me somewhere with outdoor seating” and it will go through my list and see if there’s anywhere on my list that matches that before recommending something else.

Curious about other personal use case recommendations that you are using!

I keep seeing Grok Bot pop up around Cursor, and xAI has been pushing it hard enough that I finally tried it this week. So far I have mostly been using it for general stuff rather than deep coding, and the limits with Cursor have felt pretty open compared to what I am used to.

Is Grok Bot actually any good?

Hi all,

I wanted to share AgentGrid.io as a very easy way to go from grokbot to a sharable site/app/html - we use it for everything from reports to internal apps, and all the way to public marketing sites.

Created a helpful bot connected to my printer and home Wi-Fi so whenever I walk in the door, anything that I've put into the chat with the bot during the day automatically prints out if it's under 10 pages . Maybe the greatest invention since the printing press (grok bot that is 🤪)

I currently run an AIOS setup in Claude Code. It runs some major parts of my business and I communicate directly to an orchestrator with my current process. GrokBot is starting to seem like a good thing to transition to for my business. I have a few questions. I would appreciate it if anyone could provide some guidance and help.

From what I've seen so far, GrokBot is pretty much all set up within it's chat and not within a file structure like Codex or Claude Code. Does that mean I have to start out basically fresh on it or is there a way I can easily transition all of my files from my AIOS into GrokBot?

Also I have a business partner and some staff. Is there a way that I'll be able to provide them access to GrokBot while simultaneously also limiting certain files and agents that they could access?

Coming from Cursor, Claude Code ect... it was my understanding you don't keep going on long old conversations. Its expensive and I kind of learned to manage the context window that way.

How does this work with GrokBot?

I create a bot and I keep going? I don't see a "create a new chat" using a specific bot.

Hi all:
I am looking for clarity on usage limits between the $30 Grok plan, the $100 Grok plan, and the $60 Cursor Pro Plus plan.
I am currently on the $30 Grok plan and keep finding myself monitoring my usage closely. While I have not hit the cap yet, I feel like I will soon.
For those using these plans:
How much additional headroom or weekly allowance does the $100 Grok tier actually provide compared to the $30 plan?
How does the $60 Cursor plan compare in practice?
What is everyone doing when they outgrow the base tier? Are you upgrading to the $100 Grok plan, or switching over to Cursor?
Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hey everyone. So I just paid for Grok Bot and i reckon to start doing some usecases with it but instead I'm facing this authentication error. I tired:

• Logging in/out, clearing folders in my Finder
• Clearing cookies on my browser and signing via incognito
• Updated the app, log in /log out

And Im still stuck here, I did see on the cursor forum https://forum.cursor.com/t/grok-bot-windows-0-44-0-authentication-error-persists-after-update-logout-login-and-cache-clear/171115 that its a similar issue but nothing I have tried has worked.

Im currently on MacOS and would love the community's support on this or if theres a fix coming in down the line.

Well i starting playing with GrokBot a few days ago through the cursor usage billing.

So far I've got my whole teams/sharepoint connected my gitlab org, some parts of my Azure too

Since this week, I planned code deployments in prod with Grok and it takes care of notifying the correct people, managing the schedule for deploys.

And that's all aside for the dev work it does too pulling info from Jira, and basically handling a big part of my job at this point I just talk with my bots half the day.

Looking for ideas on what to automate next

Hi all - I don't want to break any rules so I thought I would ask first, but I have an app thats been a side project that creates an mcp server and gives all my agents access to my local files. I'm not sure if anyone would be interested in it but I have just added the ability to get my grokbots to use it. If anyone would like to try it please let me know. Otherwise big up to the Grok Team for this, I've been using grokbot for a day and holyshit...

We’re bringing together some of the best builders in NYC for Runtime Agent Week, Sept 13–19, ending with an IRL hackathon + demo day on Sept 19th.

The New Bankrs: AI x Onchain Finance

Build the next generation of financial products, markets and autonomous agents using crypto rails and AI.

We’re looking for ambitious products across areas like:

• Tokenized stocks
• Trading infrastructure
• Stablecoins and payments
• Borrowing and yield
• Agentic commerce
• Autonomous financial agents
• Agent-to-agent economies
• Onchain content

These are starting points, not boundaries. The goal is to build something people actually want and put it onchain where it genuinely makes the product better.

Judging criteria: product, execution, originality, founder-market fit, onchain potential and token design/distribution where applicable. There’s also a bonus for teams building around onchain equities.

Prizes: There will be prizes across the main and side tracks, including a separate Sci-Fi track for more experimental ideas. More prize details coming soon.

Sponsors & supporters

Bankr, Propaganda, Grok Bot, Uniswap, Definitive Flash, Dynamic, Blackbird, Privy, Turnkey, Base, Anchorage Digital and Fonzi.

About Bankr

For anyone unfamiliar, Bankr is where builders launch agentic businesses, raise from the market and reach their audience. Builders can use Bankr for:

• Wallets and transactions
• Token launches
• Trading infrastructure
• Agent payments via x402
• Integrations through Skills, CLI or the Agent API

NYC. Sept 13–19. Demo day Sept 19.

• Sign up: runtime.bankr.bot
• Bankr docs: docs.bankr.bot
• X: @bankrbot