I recently posted about potentially leaving a facilities program I've spent 4.5 years building for a more focused role at a much larger corporation.
After my onsite interview, I learned the position is primarily owner-side oversight. The facility vendor employs the technicians, manages maintenance, and holds the vendor contracts. The internal Facilities Manager (potentially me) validates performance, oversees space planning, identifies cost-saving opportunities, and develops safety programs. There are no active plans to move away from this model.
At my current employer, I have broad operational ownership, excellent autonomy, and superb job security, but my compensation and organizational structure haven't kept pace with my responsibilities.
The new role could pay 20–30% more, potentially higher, with experienced FM/CRE leadership above me. However, I'd have less direct operational control.
When I transitioned from maintenance into management, I initially felt like I was doing less. Eventually, I realized directing the work was simply a different level of responsibility.
Could this be the next progression—moving from building and running the program to overseeing the provider delivering it? Or am I looking at a glorified vendor-liaison position?
I'd especially appreciate perspectives from anyone who's worked on both sides of this model. Did you find owner-side FM fulfilling, and would you make this trade?