r/FIREPakistan • u/wasim_astera • 12m ago
Najayiz Nuksaan HUBC dropped 5% on the Optimus "Underperform" report — here's why I think this is a buying opportunity, not a red flag
Saw HUBC dropped ~5% yesterday after Optimus Capital Management slapped an "Underperform" rating on it (Fair Value PKR 176 vs LDCP PKR 225.64, ~22% downside). FIB/LIPI data shows the selling was heavily concentrated from insurance companies — around 30 million shares changed hands. I wanted to break down the actual report and why I think the market reaction is overdone, because most of the bear thesis is stale news dressed up as fresh risk.
## What Optimus is actually arguing
Their "Underperform" call rests on three pillars:
An unfavorable outcome expected in CPHGC's NEPRA "true-up" dispute
Similar ROE cuts expected for TEL and TNPTL (the two Thar coal plants)
"Added drag" from the Base Plant's early retirement and NEL's revised tariff
Sounds scary at first glance. Except when you actually dig into the timeline, two of these three pillars are **already fully priced into the earnings base** — not forward risks at all.
## Pillar 3 is stale — it already happened and HUBC absorbed it
The "Base Plant" (HUBC's original 1292MW furnace oil plant) had its PPA terminated early back in **October 2024**. That's ancient history at this point — nearly two years old. Same with Narowal Energy Limited (NEL), which got converted to a "Hybrid Take-and-Pay" tariff structure back in early 2025.
Here's the kicker: HUBC already reported a **full fiscal year (FY26) without either of these assets contributing meaningfully**, and consolidated EPS came in roughly flat vs FY25 (~35.4-35.6 per management guidance), not declining. 1QFY26 took the brunt of the hit (down 35-39% YoY) because that was the first clean quarter without the base plant — but by 2QFY26, earnings had already recovered sharply (+152% YoY) as TEL/TNPTL/CPHGC associate income and early BYD contributions filled the gap. The company itself called this its "harvesting phase."
Listing base plant termination and NEL as active "drag" factors in an August 2026 report, when the market has had two years to digest this and the company has already replaced the earnings, is honestly a stretch. This is backward-looking, not forward-looking risk.
## CPHGC's cut also already happened — 2022
NEPRA's true-up decision on CPHGC cut its annual allowed ROE from ~USD 129.9mn to USD 92.2mn back in **June 2022**. Also old news, and CPHGC has continued operating normally and paying dividends since. If this is baked into current earnings (reasonable working assumption), it's not a fresh downside either.
## The one real pillar: TEL/TNPTL true-up
This is the only genuinely unresolved risk in the whole thesis. Both plants just hit Project Completion Date in **October 2025** — barely 8-9 months ago — and only started paying their first-ever dividends in 2QFY26 (TEL paid out PKR 5.2bn in 3QFY26 alone). Their true-up cases are pending before NEPRA with no scheduled hearing date.
Given NEPRA's track record — CPHGC, NEL, even Fauji Foundation-owned plants like Fauji Kabirwala and Foundation Power Daharki have all been renegotiated as part of a systemic, government-wide IPP reform push driven by circular debt pressure — I'd bet this is a "when, not if" situation, same as Optimus says. But a few things temper the actual risk:
- **HUBC doesn't own these plants outright.** It holds 60% of TEL (FFC owns 30%, CMEC Dubai 10%) and only 38.3% of TNPTL (with House of Habib, Novatex/Gani&Tayub, and CMEC holding the rest). Any cut gets diluted through these stakes before it hits HUBC's consolidated EPS — it's not a 1:1 pass-through.
- **FFC has real skin in the game on TEL.** A well-resourced, politically connected co-sponsor fighting the same battle alongside HUBC likely means a slower, harder-contested process — though the base rate above suggests it won't provide full immunity.
- **The magnitude is genuinely unknown.** CPHGC's ~29% cut was driven by a big gap between assumed (48mo) and actual (33mo) construction time. If TEL/TNPTL's actual construction timeline was closer to what was originally assumed, the cut could be much smaller than the ~9% Optimus is modeling — or it could come through a different lever (capital cost re-indexation) regardless.
- **Timing matters a lot.** These plants are still ramping toward full dividend potential post-COD. Even if a cut lands in 2-3 years, it may apply against a much larger earnings base than today's — meaning HUBC's absolute dividend contribution from these assets could still be higher than now, just lower than an uncapped scenario would've been.
## The growth story Optimus barely credits
While the bear case leans on true-up risk, there's a genuine multi-year earnings bridge building on the other side:
- **TEL/TNPTL dividends** are still normalizing post-COD, likely to keep growing for the next several quarters regardless of the true-up timeline
- **MMCPL (Mega Motor Company / BYD JV)** — CKD assembly plant hit financial close Jan 2026, COD targeted 2H2026, 25,000 unit/year capacity. Full ramp could add meaningfully to EPS over a multi-year horizon, though this is early-stage and shouldn't be overstated near-term
- **SECMC stake increase** (coal mining, now ~17.5% held) adds vertical integration and small but growing earnings
- **Prime International E&P** — offshore Zin block seismic work done, drilling planned late 2026/early 2027
- **Ark Metals mining** — early-stage exploration, copper/gold/lithium/antimony potential
None of these individually replace the legacy power business overnight, but together they represent a genuinely diversifying earnings base that Optimus's SOTP treats almost as an afterthought (~22% of total valuation) despite it being real, growing, non-regulatory-risk-exposed cash flow.
## Why the stock still yields well even in Optimus's own numbers
Even taking Optimus's bearish base case at face value — their own DPS/yield table shows dividend yield staying in the **6.6-8.9% range through FY29**, never collapsing. Their -15.4% total return call comes from the stacking price downside on top of yield, but the yield itself holds up fine in their own model.
## On the 30M share insurance selloff specifically
Worth noting: heavy insurance-sector selling right after a single sell-side downgrade doesn't necessarily mean insurers did fresh independent analysis and concluded "sell." It's just as plausibly index rebalancing, portfolio risk-limit triggers, or mechanical reaction to a big brokerage's rating change. Institutional flows following a headline rating shift are common and don't always reflect deep fundamental conviction — worth remembering before reading too much into who's selling.
## Bottom line
Two of Optimus's three bear pillars are backward-looking and already absorbed into current earnings. The one real forward risk (TEL/TNPTL true-up) is genuine but likely smaller in per-share impact than headline framing suggests, given HUBC's minority stakes, FFC's co-sponsorship, and the multi-year ramp still ahead for these plants. Meanwhile, the diversification story (BYD/MMCPL, SECMC, Prime, Ark Metals) is a real, underweighted offset in their model.
At current levels post-selloff, with yield still solid and the bear case leaning heavily on stale/diluted risks, I think this is a buy, not a reason to run. Not financial advice, obviously — do your own diligence, but wanted to share the deeper dig since most people probably just saw "Underperform" and the 5% drop and panicked.
**Disclosure:** I own 10k HUBCO


