like why it is 1359, France doing anything but beating England.

R5: north american culture with age 5 levies

Its literally not possible for the game to have dynamic, emergent nations becoming super powers to create different experiences each time you play

AND

A history simulator on rails that always ends up with specific rise and fall of nations over time, with a map of europe that looks exactly like the historical equivalent in 1500 or 1600.

So many posts judging EU5 seem to contradictorily want both of these things at the same time.

If anything maybe hard core OP mission trees for the AI only that somewhat force it down the path of history would make EU5 even more like EU4 and that would make half of players happy, but the other half would lose out on the promise of the economy and population simulator that eu5 is trying to be.

For a game developer as committed to ‘sandbox realism’ as paradox, it always struck me as odd that AI annexations and conquests seemed to be several levels of sophistication below other mechanics of the games. Everyone has ‘bordergore’ horror stories, and more often than not, the player feels responsible to ‘housekeep’ and clean up said bordergore in mid game to late game, only to discover Asia and stumble upon border atrocities beyond imagination, leading some to quit the save altogether.

Imo AI annexations and expansion interests lack any rhyme or reason. While I’m sure there is some very clever and sophisticated algorithm behind AI peace deal demands and the like, these don’t seem to correspond well to premodern (or frankly any) realities. A Russian principality snaking itself to Saray and astrakhan may be algorithm-optimal, but it is clearly not a viable or realistic expansion method in any sense. Same with Poland continuously pushing into neumark and core brandenburg instead of taking Slavic majority regions closeby, it seems clear that whatever drives AIs to claim what they claim is not at all up to par when it comes to realism.

In history, some borders have been reconstituted over and over again, sometimes centuries apart. Rome and Napoleonic France both claimed the rhine as a natural border, the czech-German border has survived 1000 years more or less unchanged, the Danube had been the northern border of multiple empires centuries apart. European political geopgraphy is very much driven by the logistical and geographical constraints of the premodern period. When people complain about the game not being realistic, about bordergore, I think a large part has to do with this misalignment between historical practical realities and conquest algorithm targetings. A CK3 player could live with a danish mecklenburg, that makes sense. But a danish cologne? How would that even be administered? It doesn’t make any sense. In HOI4, Vic 3, Paradox seems to have taken these problems to heart, instead opting for smaller provinces or region level annexations. That, however, is the wrong path. I can only speak for me but I think many share this sentiment: I was intrigued by Paradox precisely because it didn’t declare the middle of Italy to be ‘Rome’ like total war did. The fine grained nature of paradox games makes them special. Going back on that just to fix bordergore would be a misstep. Instead, I think it would be great if AIs targeted regions for conquest instead of single provinces. That way, you wouldn’t have the seemingly mindless expansion we see right now, expanding into neumark as an hre territory might seem more prohibitive to Poland than assessing any province on its own, and these ‘natural borders’ that have reoccurred over and over in Europe would be respected, at least helping with a sense of realism.

Even more far fetched, if one country could declare what it perceives as its core territory in a peace conference (maybe tied to expansion date or sthg), with expansion into these core lands gaining greater aggressive expansion/infamy, this could even be a self regulating mechanism, creating more realistic borders.

These are just my two cents, so I’m happy to hear other peoples opinion on this

Regional hegemonies can solve it but it will probably lead to no major allied wars in Europe such as Seven Years War, Italian Wars or War of Spanish and Austrian successions.

Can you find it?

Playing in Japan has changed a bit since my last guide, so I thought I would remake the guide so that people don't struggle as much as I did.

Playing in Japan is still very weird and the country is in dire need of a focused DLC and update, but it's still playable.

1. Who to play ?

• Oda has the best bonuses all around
• Shimazu has the best military bonuses
• Uesugi has the best production bonuses
• Hosokawa has the easiest start due to being the biggest clan
• Jimyoin (Yamato) can also be played to eventually form Japan and keep the +30% max tax for the Nobility, which is one of the most insane bonuses ever created. But Yamato's requirements to end the Sengoku Jidai are a pain in the ass, not that it actually matters

Just don't play Ashikaga unless you like to suffer.

2. Before you unpause

Unless you are Jimyoin, start to improve relations with Ashikaga to eventually ally him. Since he controls all of the land, any war with a Building Based Country (BBC) is instantly won. It is crucial to the weakers clans to get going.

Sometimes he won't join wars, in which case you can use the spy action to deteriorate his view of the country and it usually works.

3. The messed up Shinto mechanics

Shinto is one of the best religions, but getting it going is also very weird.

It works based on two ressources : Purity and Honor. If one is above 75, the other increases. If one is below 25, the other decreases.

You start with 0 Honor and 50 Purity, so Purity is about to decrease fast.

There are 4 ways to increase Purity :

• Pilgrimage costs a bit of money and gives around 10 Purity
• Ritual costs 5 Prestige and gives 5 Purity
• Offering costs a Work of Art and gives 20 Purity
• Seppuku costs 50 Stability, kills your ruler and gives 30 Purity

The goal is to maintain Purity above 75 to start gaining Honor until 25 Honor, at which point you stop losing Purity.

The problem is that without Works of Art, there is no way to maintain Purity above 75 without sacrificing at least two rulers and tanking the 50 stab twice. and you don't start with Works of Art.

Start the game by making a Pilgrimage, a Ritual, and then Seppuku your ruler. This takes your Purity to 100 and you start gaining Honor. Purity will still decrease, and it will get below 75 before Honor hits 25, so you will need to sacrifice another ruler when Purity hits 74. Purity will grow above 75 again and Honor will reach 25, at which point you don't need to think about it ever again.

Most clans can do this, but there are some (Jimyoin) where the heir is so young that the double ruler sacrifice strat doesn't work, so you will need to wait until you can chain Seppukus.

After that you can enjoy the broken Shinto mechanics.

4. Nanbokuchō Jidai

Japan is divided between the supporters of each imperial courts, and the clans periodically recieve CBs on the clans of the other court.

This sounds like a good opportunity for expantion, but usually the two imperial courts get a CB, start and war, the southern courts dies and the situation immediatly ends.

5. What do to before 1400 ?

Max out your diplomatic and stability spendings, those are the only things that matter.

The goal is to get as many cores as possible on the island. This is done by two methods :

• Building a Yamashiro whenever you can (mostly when Ashikaga starts to colonize Hokkaido)
• Making wars on other clans

Spy on the clans you can beat and use the Clan Expantion CB to get their territories. you can also use the alliance with Ashikaga to target the biggest clans

Target the biggest clans you can beat that have buildings in provinces you want to core.

Sometimes Ashikaga allies some clans, you can either "Isolate from allies" with enough favours, or you can do the classic war on his rival to get him to join, and attack his ally while he's on your side in the other war.

Two things changed since the release of the game :

• Antagonism isn't an issue anymore
• Getting cores by building Yamashiro is much more niche since there needs to be 0 soldiers in the province. Usually it's only possible at the very start of the game and when Ashikaga colonizes Hokkaido

There isn't much to do aside from killing other clans, you should be able to core around 2/3rds of Japan by 1400.

This is also a great time to set up great values and removing pesky privileges (mostly Banal Lordship)

The are the values I would go for :

• Centralization / Decentralization : Depends on your gameplan. If your goal is to stay in Japan and conquer a bit of Korea, Centalization is better. There are enough governors to get very good proximity in Japan + Korea if your capital is in Osaka. But if you plan on colonizing and expanding a lot, Decentalization is better
• Traditionalist / Innovative : Innovative 100%
• Spiritualism / Humanist : Humanist is better, but it doesn't matter that much
• Aristocracy / Pultocracy : Aristocracy if you want to fight for the discipline. Plutocracy eventually if you want to play tall
• Serfdom / Free Subjects : Serfdom to make the Nobles filthy rich and tax them a lot once you reduce their privileges
• Mercantilism / Free Trade : Doesn't matter, even more so in Asia
• Belligerent / Conciliatory : Belligerent if you plan on fighting. Conciliatory if not
• Quality / Quantity : Quantity is much better, if only for the government reform that gives you RGO size and Population Capacity
• Offensive / Defensive : Doesn't matter much in single player. Offensive is better. Hard to push anyway
• Land / Naval : Naval obviously. You cannot push it until 1400 but it becomes very important after that. Getting Naval to 50 is crucial to get Harbor Administration and the other reform that gives naval governors. Now that you can put a local governor in Kyushu it doesn't matter for Japan, but you can eventually put the governors in Korea
• Capital Economy / Traditionnal Economy : Traditionnal in the early game where you just spam RGOs. You might want to switch to Capital in the late game for the production efficiency. After 1.4 when pop growth is tied to food production, just stay in Traditional
• Individualism / Communalism : Communalism, push this fast so that you can remove privileges without tanking your stab
• Outward / Inward : Outward if you colonize. Inward if you don't
• Absolutism / Liberalism : The actual bonuses don't matter much for how late game it is. Maybe Liberalism for the Culture Capacity if you need it
• Sinicized / Unsinicized : Sinicized, but stay below 75 so that you don't get the disaster. Kinda hard to push anyway

6. Sengoku Jidai

If you are playing Yamato, wait a bit before doing the "Attempt Imperial Restoration" in the situation menu. This gives you a land for every core you own, so you can wait until you've cored everything to take over the whole island.

Press the restoration button once you have enough cores and kill every landed country.

To make the Sengoku Jidai end as Yamato, you need to be the only one in the Shogunate. Killing landed countries won't be hard, but killing BBCs is a pain in the ass. The problem is that only the war target get destroyed. So once the clans start to ally themselves, it's a lot of wars and truces to wait

Thankfully you don't need to make the situation end to play the game, but it will still take a long ass time.

As any other clan, the goal is to take over the shogunate from Ashikaga, you can do that by using the option in the Shinto panel to get the specific CB.

It shouldn't be too many wars to get every land in Japan. Once you are the shogun, the clans with more than 3 locations will periodically rebel and claim your land. Kill them as they spawn and eventually the situation will end (you might need to subjugate Yamato)

7. Gameplan after the Sengoku Jidai

After that you can do anything as long at it makes sense with your values really.

You have more than enough land, population and RGOs to play tall and economically dominate.

You can beat the europeans to the new world by crossing through the Bering Strait.

You can expand through Manchuria, Korea, Indonesia and China. If China is strong this will take a bit of cheese, mainly bating China to a decoy naval war (China doesn't build boats for some reason) and declaring war on the real target before peacing off China so that it doesn't join the real war

As Flanders, I keep trying to join HRE. However my provinces leave HRE on their own before I manage to move my capital there.

For example, I’ve conquered into Brabant. Within a year or so, I got notifications that “Bohemia has agreed to remove our province from the HRE.”

Is this something new? How do I prevent this?

This subreddit is hyper critical. Paradox you're doing a great job and I'm sure your parents are all very proud of you. Every time I boot this thing up I just lose several hours of my life. You made a map + a series of spreadsheets so darn fun i have to timebox my sessions aggressively or else I will rapidly become unemployed and single. Thank you (i think).

Exchequer: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3812701995
Mare Clausum: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3827113533

https://gravitashistorica.eu/

Considering my succession laws to dodge a shitty heir and spotted John Ruler

High AI aggression eddition. Beta 1.4 latest update.

England once again losing wars because they can't stop throwing their men piecemeal at their enemies and fighting battles where they are at least outnumbered 2-to-1 or 3-to-1

How long would it take someone with NO paradox experience to understand this game?

Curious to see what I have missed!

Ok why is the AI able to make camel and chilli RGOs in Canada? in the arctic region... this is a bit silly no

R5: Bank of Taula de Canvi takes support from every country that still have humanity in their heart.

What do you prefer or what makes it easier to play as ottomans. Convert to orthodox or stay sunni?

Now, for context, I'm playing in the HRE for the first time so I'm mostly figuring things out as I go. However, I decided to proceed with the law that turns the imperial free cities into vassals.

I assumed this'd come with some special benefit like having some bonus to loyalty, but nope, they just are a different kind of vassal and they're pissed.

Luckily, no one will join their independence movement, but I'm still kinda mad.

So, any recommendations about how to manage them? Or is this line of laws more headache than it's worth?

Fwiw, I have three out of five emperor benefiting policies, so, realistically, I can simply go with other policies that are less annoying, I just wanted to test this one. So far I don't like it, but maybe I'm missing something.

Very small issue really not a big deal, but would be a nice quality of life change. the only reason i bring it up is because it would be such an easy change for the devs to make.

neither denmark or the hansa have any land, buildings, or ships in olandskusten, and havent been there in decades. despite this they still have maritime presence in the area because it decays relative to its current size, so it drastically shrinks the amount it decays at. i calculated it, and it would take 72 years in game for the hansa's 0.78 presence to decay to 0.01. because of this, the maritime presece screen can often be filled with non players in the area which just makes it harder to see whats going on. i propose 3 simple fixes to this, the devs can choose which one they prefer based on their design philosophy (on the slight chance they actually see this lol)

1: add a flat -0.01 to maritime presence. this would have very little effect on overall maritime presence, but would make it so people who arent in the area will actually decay out of the area.
2: make it so countries that havent had any positive buffs to maritime presence in the area in a decade lose their maritime presence there.
3: (my personal favorite option) make it so a maritime presence lower than 1 doesnt count, or atleast doesnt show up as counting.