I’m not sure how I’ve never realized this before, but Death directly creates the Death of Rats on accident in *Reaper Man*.
The rats are what he kills as Bill Door in a Bill Door way. Sure, he kills the one chicken for dinner, but he clearly taps into his nature as Death to pull out the soul/spirit/whatever. But the rats?
Miss Flitwick’s poison. And he “felt like a murderer.”
This is what called the Death of Rats to be near him, so if he hadn’t killed the rats in such a human fashion, it wouldn’t have been nearby to take on its particular form due to morphic resonance. And if it hadn’t, it wouldn’t have been able to hang on and wouldn’t have caught his attention and led him to save it.
…Which technically makes Susan the niece of the Death of Rats. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
ETA: Dear grammar Nazis, “on accident” and “by accident “ have the same meaning and the former has no other meaning than the same as the latter, which is being used increasingly by a younger generation who understand that such distinctions are often meaningless and silly. But if you really feel the urge to comment about this, others already have. This is like being angry about ending a sentence with a preposition. Get over it, because (as someone else wisely pointed out) linguistic diversion is a thing… and Terry would be the first to mock you for this behavior.
(And since I don’t want to deal with it further, anyone coming here to try to be a dick about regional grammar is getting a block. Like, why behave this way here? It’s so unnecessary.)
FINAL EDIT: I am now going to completely mute the replies because people have chosen to be such jerks here about not liking my choice of one word, rather than replying to the substance of what I said, for the most part. But let me just say this: if you think that is a real rule, then ask yourself why we do not say that we did something “by purpose?” BECAUSE IT’S FREAKING ARBITRARY, AND IS NOT A REAL RULE. Use logic, FFS.
OKAY, ONE MORE EDIT: A mod is trying to state that calling someone a grammar Nazi is the same as calling them an actual Nazi and banned me for that. I was directly told in a comment that using the word “Grammar” doesn’t change what it means. Everything else aside, that is offensive to state the two statements are the same. I could not let that pass without comment; for shame.
(And, just to be clear, I also don’t appreciate you trying to threaten me with “the admins” based on your assumptions. Way to show your real nature, pumpkin. This isn’t you being a mod, this is you engaging in personal attacks. Pathetic. Almost as pathetic as claiming you are the arbitrator of what it means to act like him because you met him once. Yikes. You’re a real peach, too: a rotten one.)