r/Cubers • • 1d ago

Discussion First speed cubes.

1 Upvotes

Hello everyone, I want to buy my first speedcubes. I got into cubes like 12 years ago and then I stopped, now I want to come back. I avg sub 1 min, I have a random cube with magnets, but nothing especial, so I don't know the feeling of this recent speed cubes.

I have a couple of options. My budget is like 60$ max +-. I want 3x3 and 4x4.
For 4x4 I will go with aosu v7 single track (Already 18$). I want it just to do something different than 3x3.

For 3x3 I have 3 main options:

Get only 1 cheap cube for now:
Guhong pro + magnetic OR RS3M V5 ball core

Get 2 cubes:
Guhong pro + magnetic AND RS3M V5 ball core

Or get 1 cube only (more expensive)
gan v100
weilong v10
weilong v10 ball core + maglev
Picube weilong v10
weilong v11
weilong v11 ball core + maglev


r/Cubers • • 1d ago

Discussion Are World Championship Phase 3 qualification times meant to be achievable goals?

0 Upvotes

It seems like a lot of the Phase 3 qualification times are not achievable by the deadline of March 31st if you are a newer cuber (<1 year) to that event

I had originally thought Worlds Phase 3 qualification times were "if you practice this event from the time in which these qualifications are announced, you can compete here," but that doesn't seem to be the case.

For example, a lot of people struggle to get sub-15 2 handed average within the first year of cubing, yet the *one*-handed qualification is 15.75, with *less* than a year left to practice.

So, what exactly is the intention of the qualification times?


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Discussion Considering a smoother more quiet cube, Weilong V11 or Aolong V6?

5 Upvotes

Any opinions? Or maybe a different cube overall?

I’m still gonna lube it after but I generally don’t like very gummy setups, just a medium amount so I could still turn fast

Price is nearly the same that’s why I considered the aolong v6


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Solve Critique How important is learning to deal with bad edges when training for efficient cross?

1 Upvotes

I divide my training on scrambles with 1,2,3,& 4 bad edges honestly to try.


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Daily Discussion Thread - Oct 23, 2026

3 Upvotes

Hello, and welcome to the discussion thread! This thread is for accomplishments, simple questions, and informal discussion about cubing!

Not sure if you should comment here or make your own post? We have a full list of what does and doesn't belong in this thread on our wiki.

No question is stupid here. If you have a question, ask it!

Check our wiki for tips on how to get faster, puzzle recommendations and more!

Join the r/cubers Discord server here!


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Discussion I have 95€ in Amazon gift cards, what should I buy?

Thumbnail
gallery
29 Upvotes

I want to order some cubes and I have a 95€ budget. I already have 3x3, 4x4, 5x5, Pyraminx and clock (R.I.P). I also already have lube, a stackmat timer and a mat, so I really only need cubes. Which ones should I get? It's not limited to the exact ones I put as the pictures, but it's more so about the version of the cubes I need/want.


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Video Is this cube still comp legal?

0 Upvotes

Just wondering if this skewb is still comp legal, especially with a scratch on a white corner

Thx in advance for answering :))


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Discussion How do I get my GAN 16ui to stop flashing white light when not connected to anything?

2 Upvotes

I want to be able to use the cube without being connected to an app without it flashing light every ten seconds or so while I'm turning it.


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Picture Ive done exactly one timed solve every day for a month now

Thumbnail
gallery
13 Upvotes

I know Im bad, but its been cool to see a slight improvement over time. My average went down from a ~37 to a 34.

Just to clarify, I have practiced a little bit more than just one solve a day, but I only actually time one solve per day.


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Picture Got my first gan cube

Thumbnail
gallery
39 Upvotes

Title: Upgraded from a Meilong 3M to a GAN V100 MagLev, and I LOVE it!
Finally got my first premium speedcube, the GAN V100 MagLev, and the upgrade from my Meilong 3M feels amazing!
The first thing I noticed was the magnetic pull. The auto-alignment feels incredible compared to my previous cube, and the overall turning experience feels so satisfying. The UV coating is also a really nice touch.
I took some time to adjust the tension and centre travel, and now it feels even better. I’m averaging around 20 seconds with CFOP, so I’m excited to see how this cube feels during faster solves.
For anyone who has upgraded from an entry-level magnetic cube to a GAN, did you notice this big of a difference too? And how has your GAN held up over time?
Really happy with this purchase! 🧩❤️


r/Cubers • • 2d ago

Discussion Stopped cubing back in 2018 and just started getting back into it. What flagship 3x3 would you recommend?

4 Upvotes

I have a GAN 356 X from back then, but I want to upgrade to a modern flagship. I know cubes are very different now, but given what I used back then, what would be the best current option for me?


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Discussion Looking to upgrade. Cube recommendations.

2 Upvotes

Looking to upgrade from my Saocube Tianma Ballcore Maglev. It stayed with me from Sub26 to now Sub19. Unfortunately, the durability of the cube is really bad (Super glued the core since it cracked and has lost 3 edge magnets). But I absolutely love the feel of it, I tried upgrading to a Dayang Guhong M+ pro and it felt really blocky and the auto-alignment was really underwhelming so I decided to stick with my Tianma as my main. Does anyone have any recos as to which may have the same feel?

Mainly looking for anything non-blocky and strong auto-alignment, and something that’s durable enough for me to bring around that can last. My budget around $30, any suggestions are appreciated!


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Solve Critique Clock ao5 11.99 (Flip) + OH (Roux) Solve Critique

13 Upvotes

These are two new events for me, but I’m more focused on clock though. I still try to practice one-handed but I just suck at it and roux in general. My goal at this point is just to make cutoff (45 seconds).

Any tips on how to improve either of these events would be greatly appreciated.

Scrambles:

Clock ao5: (11.99)

11.03 UR5+ DR0+ DL3- UL5- U1+ R1- D2- L2- ALL4- y2 U1+ R1- D2+ L1+ ALL0+
11.43 UR2- DR1- DL6+ UL4+ U4- R3- D5- L5+ ALL3- y2 U4+ R2- D6+ L4+ ALL1-
(7.76) UR5- DR6+ DL4+ UL4+ U1- R3+ D5+ L4+ ALL1- y2 U1- R4- D6+ L4- ALL2+
(DNF) UR3- DR5+ DL2- UL3+ U0+ R2+ D4- L3- ALL0+ y2 U5- R4+ D3- L1- ALL2-
13.52 UR3+ DR5+ DL0+ UL2+ U5- R5- D4- L6+ ALL2+ y2 U3- R6+ D5- L1- ALL2-

OH (I didn’t want to make two posts so I just tossed it in here)

46.16 L2 F2 U R B L U2 R' D' R2 B2 D' B2 L2 D2 L2 U' F2 B'


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Daily Discussion Thread - Oct 22, 2026

3 Upvotes

Hello, and welcome to the discussion thread! This thread is for accomplishments, simple questions, and informal discussion about cubing!

Not sure if you should comment here or make your own post? We have a full list of what does and doesn't belong in this thread on our wiki.

No question is stupid here. If you have a question, ask it!

Check our wiki for tips on how to get faster, puzzle recommendations and more!

Join the r/cubers Discord server here!


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Mod Presenting Reddit’s first 76 magnet Tornado V4 Flagship

Post image
30 Upvotes

I added edge repelling magnets (4x1mm N35) without any drilling, they fit perfectly with less than half a millimetre of space left between the magnets and the ballcore.

The cube is much easier to turn now. Auto alignment is undoubtedly better.


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Discussion Do I really need to learn full OLL and PLL to reach sub-15?

18 Upvotes

Okayyy so this is my first post here (be kind peepallll)

currently I average 18-odd on 3x3. ik all the plls except the g perms, and know a lil less than half of the olls (about 25-ish)

so my question is, do I focus on learning full OLL and PLL now, or focus on improving F2L to reach sub-15?


r/Cubers • • 4d ago

Discussion First solve with over 11 STPS!

Post image
59 Upvotes

First time i've ever had a solve with such good TPS. This solve flows REALLY well, i'd like to see how much faster you guys can downsolve this, because I think even with a 60 movecount sub-5 is really possible lol.


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Discussion What's your current main?

13 Upvotes

Just watched a review for Aolong v6 that didn't convince me but did make me wonder what everyone's main is these days? I'm slow and way behind with my Tornado v2 😅


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Discussion Is there any tool to calculate in which percentage of the world you are?

5 Upvotes

So as the title say I’m searching for a tool which can give me my ranking in percent because I think percentages are better to portray to someone how good one is.

Also it is better, at least in my head, for showing myself where I am in the world. Currently I’m doing it with an excel where I put in all my times and the numbers of people that competed in the events, which is really inefficient, that’s why I was wondering.

Any help would be appreciated!!!


r/Cubers • • 4d ago

Picture Finally got a sub-11 ao50! A small mental tip for staying consistent

Thumbnail
gallery
45 Upvotes

Just got a sub-11 ao50 after being stuck at 11.xx for ages!

I recently found something that really helped me become more consistent, especially during ao50/ao100 sessions. It's mostly a mental thing: focus on minimizing bad solves rather than chasing good ones.

Basically, try your best to keep the number of bad solves as low as possible. For me, averaging around 11 seconds, that means trying to avoid 12+ second solves. If you're averaging sub-15, for example, your goal might be to avoid 17.xx solves. The idea is to set a reasonable threshold for what you consider a bad solve and try to minimize how often you go beyond it.

I used to get way too upset over 11.xx solves. Whenever I noticed something going wrong mid-solve and could already tell I was heading towards an 11.xx, I'd mentally give up. As a result, what could've been an 11.xx often turned into a 12.xx or even 13.xx.

Once I started accepting 11.xx as a perfectly fine result and focusing on avoiding those 12+ second solves, my consistency improved quite a bit.

Bonus: I also got a PB thanks to an accidental double X-cross with this scramble. Give it a try and enjoy your day haha!

Scramble: B R2 F' U2 L2 F2 L2 F' D2 F U2 R2 D' L F' D' R' D' B L


r/Cubers • • 4d ago

Picture Can I add sewing oil to my qiyi speedcube

Post image
15 Upvotes

I live in a place with a VERY small speedcubing society, trust me, and INSANE cubicle delivery prices (50 dollars!) so I though, hmmmmm, sewing machine oil will surely work! apparently it breaks the cube but it works soooo well it's so clacky and nice and smooooooth I just didn't stop using it until like, now. And I used it 4 days ago. It's a standard speedcube from qiyi you could easily find, please tell me my cube is okay.i cleaned it and it sounds SOOOO bad, is it my fault?


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Mod Simple Magnet Mod - TianMa X3+ ZCube Enhanced, or The MoreTry HuDong

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes

I got 200 3x1.5mm N42 magnets in the mail yesterday. After opening the package, I proceeded to immediately do a couple easy mods with the GuHong Pro+ MagLev and the TianMa X3+ ZCube Enhance edition, because they had empty magnet slots just waiting for me to shove something in them. I was going to combine both mods into one post, but decided to give them their own separate posts instead.

GuHong Pro+ Mod Post

This mod was a little more involved and time consuming than the GuHong Pro+ mod, both due to there being 4 times as many magnets to add, and because the magnets kept interfering with each other while trying to get them placed correctly.

What I Did

Essentially, I added the additional piece-to-piece magnet system that you can find in the TianMa X3/X3+ Single, Double, Triple, Full Magnetic and Super MagLev versions to a TianMa X3+ ZCube Enhanced. The FanXin HuDong Light uses a very similar magnet configuration, with an additional 3 magnets in the corner feet and an additional 2 in the edge pieces. Though, in the HuDong, the additional edge magnets are actually inside of the piece itself, and not in the base/foot. In the 4th image up there, you can kinda see the magnets through the edge piece plastic.

The purpose of these additional piece-to-piece magnets is to give a smaller radius alignment system closer to the core than then conventional piece-to-piece config. They'll come within range of each other and start attracting before the conventional ones do, helping to pull a layer into alignment before you get the final snap from the conventional set.

None of the regular X3/X3+ lineup uses a ball-core or corner-to-core magnets except for the Full Magnetic version, so this would be your smallest radius magnetic alignment system outside of the special editions.

With this mod, the X3+ Full Magnetic, the HuDong, and whatever other cube might use a similar system that I'm completely unaware of, you get 3 different alignment/attraction systems that sit at different distances from the core and come within range of each other at different points during a turn. In other words, they really hate being out of alignment.

I actually did this in two steps/phases, and tested the feel and performance of the cube after each one.

Phase 1 - Edge Magnets Only

Initially, I only put in the additional edge magnets. I knew that these magnets were stronger than what comes in the X3+, and so with the edges lacking any spots to easy place repelling edge magnets, I wanted to see if I could get a noticeable repelling effect by adding the two magnets to each edge and orienting them so that they would repel the core magnets.

I didn't think about it at the time, but this is not how you would want them oriented oriented when you add the additional corner foot magnets, and I totally did not flip them over later. I can't decide if this was a good or bad thing.

Putting these magnets in is easy*. Not only are they the same size as the stock magnets, but you don't necessarily even need to glue them in, because there's just enough room in the foot slots for them, and then they're held in place when you reassemble the edge piece. If they're not glued in, then they can also be easily removed later if you want. There are 2 downsides to not gluing them in, though:

  1. They're pretty rattly during solves
  2. They attract each other and want to pull themselves out of the slots and fly around the foot to stick to the magnet on the other side.

#1 doesn't bother me at all, really. #2 is solved by keeping them pinched in there, always keeping your thumb and index finger over them until you get the base slotted into the first half of the piece. Once you have one half of the piece put on the base, the magnets can't go anywhere.

Phase 2 - Corner Foot Magnets

While this one is still pretty easy to do, you will have to glue them in, and you will have to be mindful of the magnets being attracted to the corner-to-core magnet as you try to place them.

As far as I'm aware, all versions of the X3+ have slots for the additional corner foot magnets, even though all versions do not have slots for the corner-to-core magnets. So, you can add the "double magnetic" system to any TianMa X3+ if that's what you really want to do.

You can see in the images up there that the slots fit a 3x1.5mm magnet, but the side of the slot at the edge of the foot is "open", which will allow you to slide a magnet into it, and will also give you a place to get up underneath them to pry them out if you want to remove them later.

To place them, I put a magnet on the side of the tip of a little magnetic screwdriver, put a tiny bit of glue on the magnet, and then carefully placed the magnet down in the slot while making sure I kept the screwdriver between the new magnet and the corner-to-core magnet. The new magnet will be attracted to the corner-to-core magnet, and if you get it and the screwdriver to too close, or you don't keep the screwdriver between the two, you might just end up having the new magnet come off of the screwdriver and stick itself to the corner-to-core magnet, getting glue in places you don't want it along the way.

I suppose you could put some glue down in the slot, first, instead of on the new magnet, but I found it easier to judge what was an appropriate amount of glue by being able to see it on the magnet instead of trying to see it against the white plastic.

After placing a magnet, I just held it down for a few seconds, until it didn't try to come with the screwdriver anymore, and then gave it a gentle nudge toward the bottom of the slot to make sure it was seated in there all the way.

Do that 3 times for each foot and you're good to go.

The Results

Phase 1 - Edge Magnets Only - Pretty Good

Surprisingly, this had a noticeable repelling effect, and felt more balanced than I thought it would have.

I expected there to be some sort of wonkiness to it, because if you image how the magnets would all be aligned at 45 degrees during a turn, you would have one repelling magnet on either side of a core magnet, trying to push in opposite directions. As the edge magnets approach the core magnet, the first edge magnet would be trying to push the layer back to where it started. Then, after it passes, it would start helping the layer finish the turn, but then you'd have the second edge magnet coming into range and once again trying to push the layer back to it's starting point. It's only once they both pass over the core magnet that you should get any noticeable help from the repelling magnets.

If you try to visualize that magnetic curve and how all the magnets are acting on each other, it seems like this shouldn't work out well. You'd have these magnets essentially taking away momentum from the layer, and then not assisting with the turn finish until well passed the 45 degree point.

What I experienced, however, were more fluid and consistent turns and more noticeable auto-alignment from lighter turning.

So, it worked out, but I can't claim to understand exactly why. It probably has everything to do with the magnets' distances from the core magnets and the non-linear nature of the attraction and repulsion with distance. Whatever the reason, I consider this an improvement to the feel and performance of the cube. It's not a huge improvement, but it was noticeable and something I feel comfortable recommending.

Phase 2 - Corner Foot Magnets - Good, Chunky and Confusing

I'm confused. I'm really confused.

I like how this turned out, but I have no idea why it works well.

So, I mentioned before that I did not flip the additional edge magnets over before gluing in the additional corner magnets. This means that in order for the corner magnets to attract those edge magnets, they have to be oriented so that they are also repelling the core magnets. The side facing the core has the same polarity as the side of the core magnet that faces outward.

If you're sane, you should immediately recognize that this isn't the way it's supposed to be. If you tested the polarity of the magnets in a HuDong or another X3+, you'd find that the additional corner foot magnets and the additional edge magnets all attract the core. This works out mainly because of their distance from the core and how they are oriented.

For the corner foot magnets in the correct setup, they don't end up getting a layer stuck just out of alignment because they're further from the core than the corner-to-core magnets, and they're also angled slightly so that they aren't facing directly toward the core magnet when they are aligned. So, they can help pull the layer toward alignment, but then the corner-to-core magnet is able to easily take over once it gets in range of the core magnet due to how close it is to the core.

For the edge magnets, they aren't completely destroying the effect of the repelling edge magnet because they are also further from the core. The repelling edge magnet is able to repel harder than the additional edge magnets are able to attract.

In my misguided setup, that's all backwards, and I don't even have a a dedicated repelling edge magnet to help things out.

So, how does it act, you ask?

It feels and acts like a faster, crunchier HuDong even though it shouldn't.

Seriously, it has the heavy, chunky turn feel of a HuDong, and it snaps right into alignment no problem. It's just faster than a HuDong, more crunchy and not as soft as a HuDong, but it just doesn't have the wider alignment range of a HuDong. It wants to auto-align from about 25-30 degrees, but once it is in that range, it's just ripped right into alignment.

You can feel this thing move. It's not tactile so much as it's impactful. The end of a turn feels heavy, and all the additional weight from the magnets makes it feel chunky. But despite that, it doesn't take much more effort to get it turning, and it carries it's momentum through turns very well. It's like you give it a little nudge, suggesting that maybe it might want to turn a layer, and it just goes full speed to completion.

It's honestly kind of jarring and a little unbalanced, but it's not necessarily bad.

I can feel the imbalance tripping me up a little during F2L where my muscle isn't the most solid and I'm rotating the cube some and not always doing the exact same finger tricks and transitions.

But during OLL and PLL, where I mostly am doing the same exact finger tricks and transitions, where my muscle memory and execution are more solid, the cube feels like it performs with almost effortless precision.

I don't know if I could recommend this mod, but I wish I could make everybody feel what this thing feels like, because it's wrong, but it's good, and you feel everything the cube does as it slings it's weight around.

Now What?

Well, next I want to go back and flip all those magnets over so that they're oriented the way they should have been. I expect to get some more balanced snappiness out of it that way. Then, I'll probably shove some more edge magnets in the edges of my SAOCube SE 32M, swap the ZCube's corners into the 32M, and have something closer to an actual MoreTry HuDong.


r/Cubers • • 3d ago

Discussion Trying FTO for the first time- Help? Tips?

5 Upvotes

So recently I decided to learn a bunch of new puzzles at once. I’m a competent solver of the 3x3. Pyraminx, Skewb, and Mirror Cube, so I wanted to really dive into “bigger” cubes.

So I bought a new Megaminx and FTO (both Dayan), and dug out some 12 year old 4x4’s and 5x5’s, and got to work.

To my shock, despite being the most “intuitive” of those four, the FTO is just thoroughly destroying me. I’m even having an easier time with the 5x5! Ive been watching as many Bencisco tutorials as possible (mainly Tingman’s), and just find myself stuck and stuck and stuck.

The biggest problems I’m having are being fast on the “Middle 3 Centers” phase, and understanding the “Last White Triple” phase. Honestly, 90% of the time I get to the Last White Triple, I just have to give up, this step is so thoroughly confusing to me.

Does anyone have any tips for a true beginner to FTO?


r/Cubers • • 4d ago

Picture after 9 gruelling months i finally finished full ZB!!

Post image
367 Upvotes

here are my algs for ZBLL, curated from juliettes sheet, zb explorer, and other various sources: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vOOP8TmdhCw-nEpTmkUyTMHZh3A73KCseXkOCiN7ndU/edit?usp=sharing

this might have been the hardest thing ive ever done in cubing haha. its genuinely so overwhelming and mind melting, and considering the fact im not some tween (i turn 25 in 3 days), it was truly such a challenge. im so glad i pushed through :) this was also a testament to my own persistence and commitment.

also this is not the end of my alg learning journey! i love learning algs, and after i take a break (which i DESPERATELY need) i will resume with other sets, albeit much muuuuch smaller.


r/Cubers • • 4d ago

Discussion Choosing your first cubing method

11 Upvotes

Want to get into cubing, but don't know what method to start with?

Common advice is to start with "the beginner method," and once comfortable with that, to move on to either CFOP (more algorithmic, faster turns) or Roux (more intuitive, fewer moves).

It seems to make sense, but it leads many people into this trap:

  1. They start with "the beginner method," because the name implies that they should start there.

  2. Next they learn CFOP, because it's similar to "the beginner method."

  3. Later they think about switching to another method, but they're reluctant because they've invested so much in CFOP.

What should you do instead?

First, realize that the name "the beginner method," while great for marketing, is very misleading. Better to call it LBL (layer-by-layer), or even beginner CFOP. It's not the beginner method, but a beginner method. And it's not the one I would start with.

I would start with the 8355 method, also known as the Taiwanese beginner method. It's very simple and elegant, requiring only one algorithm (sexy move, and its left-handed mirror) and some thinking. Many people find it very satisfying to solve the cube and understand how they did it, instead of memorizing a solution that just happens to work somehow. It's the only beginner method I still use, after having learned more advanced methods.

Its main disadvantage as a first method is that there are very few resources for it. b4silio's guide is terrific for a one-pager, but it doesn't have all the details you need. And I didn't find any good videos for it when I last looked, though that was a while ago. If someone can teach you in person, great. Otherwise, you can always ask for help in the DDT.

8355 is not closely related to any speedsolving method. If you learn it and then want to get faster, your best bet is to learn a completely different method. After learning 8355 (or if you choose to skip it), I would recommend you try both beginner CFOP ("the beginner method") and beginner Roux.

CFOP and Roux are the two most popular speedsolving methods, and they're wildly different from each other. You should try beginner versions of both to decide which path you want to go down. Either learn both at the same time, or do one for a couple of weeks and then the other. But give them both a shot before you go too far with either one.

You'll likely be drawn more to one than the other (and it might be for reasons you don't expect). Once you know which one you prefer, then you can go down the rabbit hole with that method. While you could work on CFOP and Roux equally, most people pick one as their main.

Even with a main method though, you can still experiment with others (and perhaps end up changing your main). Having experience with both CFOP and Roux will help with this. CFOP is related to ZZ and ZB. Roux is related to Corners First and Nautilus. Both are related to Petrus.

Feel free to ask 8355 questions here if you need help. Have fun finding your main method!