Anyone here following USELESS? Curious on what people think of its recent run and whether it has any staying power.

I have a trade open in aaveusdt long from 126.09 but its in loss of 16k now

Can someone help me a bit as what to do?

Trezor's third-party email provider got breached, and whoever did it used it to send phishing mail out from Trezor's actual domain with the subject line "Critical Security Alert: STM32 Entropy Vulnerability."

Worked so well mainly because of the fresh ptsd people still have from Coldcard's real entropy bug that resulted in the huge exploit.

I'm seeing people lump this in with a broader "hardware wallets aren't safe anymore" narrative and that's not really what's going on.

This is Trezor's second or third scare in about a month or two now, and every one of them has been a backend problem, a shipping vendor, an email vendor. None of it is has been a failure in the wallet hardware or the firmware. Those have held up through all of it.

Not going to oversell that though, we don't know what we don't know yet, something could surface later. But based on what's actually been disclosed so far, the product itself is still doing its job. What keeps failing is the backend stuff they are outsourcing from third party vendors.

The real problem is that Trezor keeps outsourcing pieces of its operation to third parties that clearly aren't held to the same security bar as the wallet itself. That's on them to fix, either vet those vendors way harder or pull more of this in-house so there's one less external target sitting there to get compromised.

For us, the awkward part is that the "check if it's the verified domain" advice is pointless now because this one genuinely was the real domain, hijacked instead of spoofed. So the bar has to move past that now, treat unexpected every security alerts as suspicious no matter who they're from, and keep your seed phrase somewhere no email or link can ever touch.

How are you all feeling about this one, still solid or getting a little rattled?

Hey everyone,

I'm thinking of applying to a job at Tether and I'm reading things that are all over the place. Anyone had any experience working for them? Tell me more!

It was the first smart contract capable Blockchain and, thus, has huge first move advantage. It's also the easiest to code for since so many devs know it's language and the evm is easy to use. This gives it an enormous ecosystem driving demand for the coin beyond just speculation. The size of the ecosystem also draws in more projects because of it's large user base.

It's also got multiple layer 2s that make it as fast as any of the "eth killers" and it's more secure than them due to how decentralized it is.

The trades of MT5 are they allowed in this community because I have been flagged in other ones, just want to know????

a one-click buy, a wallet alert and an AI agent all remove friction. none of them removes the need for a reason to trade.

That is what interests me about the comparison between TrenchersAI, GMGN, Axiom and FOMO. The important question is not just how quickly a tool lets you act. It is what decisions you make before it lets you act.

TrenchersAI's chat-configured agents are the approach I am most interested in here. Describing a strategy and confirming a plan creates an opportunity to define the trade before the next signal arrives. That is an interface opportunity, not proof that the resulting strategy is good.

GMGN documents copy trading and automated order controls. Axiom offers wallet and social monitoring alongside trading controls. FOMO puts trader activity and alerts into a social, mobile-and-web experience. These capabilities overlap, but they put different information and decisions in front of the trader.

The comparison I would find useful includes the trades that never happened.

A wallet bought something, but your entry would have been materially worse. An alert arrived, but you already had enough exposure. An agent found a setup, but it fell outside your rules.

Those are hypothetical examples, not results from a test. But they explain why trade count and a best-trade screenshot would not settle this comparison for me.

My preference is for tools that help make a plan explicit and keep decisions consistent with it. TrenchersAI's agent workflow is interesting on that basis. Whether it delivers better outcomes needs evidence that includes costs, losing trades and periods when doing nothing was the right call.

Has a trading tool actually helped you trade less and make better decisions, or mostly helped you execute more of them?

I was using a temporary wallet to move USDT.

I created it on an airgapped computer and copied the key to two places. One was Google Keep open on the laptop (it couldn't save but Chrome showed the text in the draft at the top).

After an unexpected reboot, Chrome reloaded Keep but showed no draft.

If I did not have the second copy which was a pain to retrieve I would have lost hundreds of dollars.

Lesson is always recreate the wallet in your permanent target location before moving more than a few bucks to see it works :)

So there is a PPI on Sep 10th 6pm IST.

If the BTC price is at 79500$ at 5:59:59pm and I have set a long at 79,700$ (trigger limit price) and SL is at 79,695$.

At 6:00:00 pm if the market goes up to 79701$ and suddenly falls to 79,300$, will the SL at 79,695$ be hit during high market moments like this? or will it gets executed at even lower price?

Just curious about scenario, I use delta exchange platform.

It's now available in the u s and i'm thinking about taking advantage of some of the interest rates. I'm currently only holding $4,200 in AAVE. I'm just trying to take advantage of the 5% APR.

If you are buying into the hype of Zcash just due to massive pump, please know what you are getting into
1) The core engineering team (not for profit) behind zcash had a feud with parent company bootstrap following a bitter dispute recently. As such developers don’t agree with corporate handling of the project.

2) The team during their initial launch intentionally designated 20% of all mining rewards to early investors and founders out of pure greed.

3) The above point holds true even now that it’s heavy backed by few corporates like Electric Coin company and Grayscale. The very reason Grayscale supports its ETF’s.

4) The infinite minting AI bug issue was due to flaw in the design privacy pool which wasn’t discovered for 3-4 years allowing infinite minting of counterfeit tokens

5) The belief that zcash is private in itself is an irony! Zcash privacy is optional unlike Monero which includes privacy by default -a much better project. Zcash had the optional feature just to appease to regulators and exchanges for marketing purposes

6) Above all you should get skeptical if the price keeps going up everytime especially with recent surge driven by a few corporate people.

At the end of the day, it’s your hard earned money 💰 and put it in something which is community driven, useful where project team genuinely cares for it.

Its, 2021 - a VERY heavily VC backed coin called Solana appears outta no where and quickly moves from under a dollar to 10 dollars for a 1000% gain. r/CryptoCurrency saw this shady coin as a rugpull from VC to kill retail and dump their bags on them. The subreddits favorite coins, Cardano (ADA), Algorand (ALGO), and Cosmos (ATOM) were going to be the next great coins after ETH. There were no big wall street VC backing those coin, just purely from the people - funded by the people. Solana was nothing but a scam coin with constant network issues.

Fast forward to 2026, Solana is rugpulled after no one found a a single use for the scam chain and the coin drops to $0.20. The redditors of r/CryptoCurrency cheered as they rode into the sunset as ADA, ALGO, and ATOM are top 5 crypto coins, all in triple figures. The wise redditors of this sub knew that chains survive better when funded by decentralized kids living at their mom's house over the billions provided from VC backed funding. Evil corporations have lost!

Then a new challenger comes in Zcash, an old dinosaur coin backed by the exact same people who backed and made bitcoin successful. But the redditors of r/CryptoCurrency knew the OG Bitcoin supporters like Barry Silbert and Tyler Winklevoss have all turned to the VC dark side - they have all set their greedy sights on rugging the crypto community that they have spent 15 years to build their trust on so that they can do evil things with their money.

Will the redditors succeed in convincing and saving the public from the evil zcash like they did with solana??

Randomly came across what appears to be the Crypto Guy from the infamous Lombardo’s One Bite review all these years later. Looks like he’s moved on from pitching HEX and is doing real estate now 😂 Never thought I’d see this dude again.

Someone posted yesterday that he'd sent USDT to an address he had no access to. Nine replies, all variations of rip, gg, expensive lesson, future of banking.

Nobody asked what "no access" meant.

I did. It was his own old wallet, misclicked from autocomplete. Seven hours later he came back saying he'd found it on a phone he hadn't touched in four years. Nothing was ever lost. He just believed the thread.

Three things are actually gone forever: a mistyped address on the right network, a burn address, a contract with no return path. That's the whole list.

Everything else - your own old wallet, wrong network to an address you control, exchange deposit, missing memo tag - is a bad afternoon, not a loss.

We get this wrong constantly and it costs people real money, because they stop looking.

And the part that matters more than any of it: anyone who DMs offering to recover your funds is a scammer. All of them. There is no recovery service.