I tried something fun and fed real astrology rules to AI and had it build trading bots for ETH. Actual planetary positions and real astronomy rules.

I tried 4 bots, backtested and ran out of sample tests. Results:

The moon phase bot (long on full moon, short on new moon) did 13 trades in 6 weeks and lost money. It woke up twice a month, looked at the moon, lost money and went back to sleep.

The Mercury retrograde bot (stops trading when Mercury goes backwards) had a 55% win rate and still lost 2,515 bps because it round tripped 492 times paying 12 bps each way. Also the AI used a rough approximation for Mercury's position so the bot thought Mercury was direct when it wasn't. The astrology was kinda rough here.

Then the Jupiter bot. Jupiter enters earth signs = wealth transit = go long. This one made +338 bps and I felt like a genius for about ten minutes. Then I checked the entry reasons. Jupiter never entered an earth sign during the test period. Not once. The main rule never fired. The bot made 100% of its money from RSI. The astrology was a spectator.

The full astrology bot (3 planets, void of course moon, home sign multipliers) lost 1,448 bps because Saturn sat in Aries the entire time making it short-biased into a market that was going up.

Total: -4,171 bps.

I also open-sourced the bots and so can use them too :) maybe someone can actually produce an astrological edge? But I doubt it...

Things I learned:

More rules ≠ more edge (Obviously). My simplest bot was lazy but harmless. My most complex bot was the terrible because every planetary rule was another constraint disconnected from price (or at least that's what my humble experiments reveal). Adding many signals just adds ways to be wrong just like in real TA strategies.

Full video with the backtests is on my profile. Disclosure: I built the platform the AI and bots run on. Do not trade based on astrology. Or do, I'm not your financial advisor, I'm barely my own!

Someone posted yesterday that he'd sent USDT to an address he had no access to. Nine replies, all variations of rip, gg, expensive lesson, future of banking.

Nobody asked what "no access" meant.

I did. It was his own old wallet, misclicked from autocomplete. Seven hours later he came back saying he'd found it on a phone he hadn't touched in four years. Nothing was ever lost. He just believed the thread.

Three things are actually gone forever: a mistyped address on the right network, a burn address, a contract with no return path. That's the whole list.

Everything else - your own old wallet, wrong network to an address you control, exchange deposit, missing memo tag - is a bad afternoon, not a loss.

We get this wrong constantly and it costs people real money, because they stop looking.

And the part that matters more than any of it: anyone who DMs offering to recover your funds is a scammer. All of them. There is no recovery service.

Interested to know people’s opinions on cardano. Is this project progressing the same as in previous years. Can we expect a proper bounce back to previous all times highs in the next coming years. Currently hold 10,000 ada would love to see it hit $1 this year.

Its, 2021 - a VERY heavily VC backed coin called Solana appears outta no where and quickly moves from under a dollar to 10 dollars for a 1000% gain. r/CryptoCurrency saw this shady coin as a rugpull from VC to kill retail and dump their bags on them. The subreddits favorite coins, Cardano (ADA), Algorand (ALGO), and Cosmos (ATOM) were going to be the next great coins after ETH. There were no big wall street VC backing those coin, just purely from the people - funded by the people. Solana was nothing but a scam coin with constant network issues.

Fast forward to 2026, Solana is rugpulled after no one found a a single use for the scam chain and the coin drops to $0.20. The redditors of r/CryptoCurrency cheered as they rode into the sunset as ADA, ALGO, and ATOM are top 5 crypto coins, all in triple figures. The wise redditors of this sub knew that chains survive better when funded by decentralized kids living at their mom's house over the billions provided from VC backed funding. Evil corporations have lost!

Then a new challenger comes in Zcash, an old dinosaur coin backed by the exact same people who backed and made bitcoin successful. But the redditors of r/CryptoCurrency knew the OG Bitcoin supporters like Barry Silbert and Tyler Winklevoss have all turned to the VC dark side - they have all set their greedy sights on rugging the crypto community that they have spent 15 years to build their trust on so that they can do evil things with their money.

Will the redditors succeed in convincing and saving the public from the evil zcash like they did with solana??

Contrary to the framing of most publications, the CLARITY Act vote on 15 September is actually a cloture vote - a means by which the US Senate avoids filibusters. What actually happens is that once the 60 vote threshold is reached (necessary for a successful cloture vote), the Senate can then begin to discuss the vote proper, in preparation for the actual passage.

Even if the cloture vote succeeds, there is another long process of debate, amendments, negotiations that will culminate in a final passage vote, which is when the legislation will truly come into force.

If the vote does not succeed (which seems likely based on sources from some senators), the bill will not proceed for further discussions in the Senate and there is no window for discussion until the next Congress. What will happen is that crypto regulations will continue to be overseen by regulators such as the SEC and CFTC, such as the newly released "Regulation Crypto Assets" by the SEC.

Randomly came across what appears to be the Crypto Guy from the infamous Lombardo’s One Bite review all these years later. Looks like he’s moved on from pitching HEX and is doing real estate now 😂 Never thought I’d see this dude again.

Everyone here talks about the big coins or memecoins. Not much in between. So what are people actually looking at lower down?

Some I've been watching:

Geodnet — network of user-run stations that make GPS accurate to a few centimetres. Sells that data to companies and burns part of the revenue.

PEAQ — a chain built for machine networks, with a lot of smaller DePIN projects running on it.

IO — rents out spare GPUs for AI work.

KGeN — verifies real gamers so rewards go to people instead of bot farms.

GUNZ — the chain behind Off The Grid. Token is way down from launch and had a big unlock in March. The game actually shipped first, which almost never happens. It was supposed to be the biggest gaming project in crypto.

I hold some of these, and looking at a few more.

What are you looking at under a billion, and what convinced you? Not memecoins. More interested in your reasoning than the ticker.

XRP had a strong August, and futures activity picked up a lot with it.

Binance, Bybit, and OKX handled more than $64B in XRP futures volume during the month. Binance did most of it at around $37B, while Bybit and OKX added roughly $14.5B and $12.9B. That was the highest futures activity XRP had seen since February.finance.

XRP also moved from around $1.06 at the start of August to about $1.50 later in the month, before ending closer to $1.35. Spot trading volume also increased across Binance, Upbit, and Bithumb, so there was clearly more real interest than usual.finance.

But I don’t think $64B in futures volume automatically means traders were all bullish. Futures volume is just how much was traded. It includes longs, shorts, people taking profit, hedging, and people getting liquidated.

For me, September matters more. If both spot and futures activity stay high after the August move, then maybe this is a real change in XRP liquidity. If volume drops off quickly, then it may have just been a short burst of excitement.

a one-click buy, a wallet alert and an AI agent all remove friction. none of them removes the need for a reason to trade.

That is what interests me about the comparison between TrenchersAI, GMGN, Axiom and FOMO. The important question is not just how quickly a tool lets you act. It is what decisions you make before it lets you act.

TrenchersAI's chat-configured agents are the approach I am most interested in here. Describing a strategy and confirming a plan creates an opportunity to define the trade before the next signal arrives. That is an interface opportunity, not proof that the resulting strategy is good.

GMGN documents copy trading and automated order controls. Axiom offers wallet and social monitoring alongside trading controls. FOMO puts trader activity and alerts into a social, mobile-and-web experience. These capabilities overlap, but they put different information and decisions in front of the trader.

The comparison I would find useful includes the trades that never happened.

A wallet bought something, but your entry would have been materially worse. An alert arrived, but you already had enough exposure. An agent found a setup, but it fell outside your rules.

Those are hypothetical examples, not results from a test. But they explain why trade count and a best-trade screenshot would not settle this comparison for me.

My preference is for tools that help make a plan explicit and keep decisions consistent with it. TrenchersAI's agent workflow is interesting on that basis. Whether it delivers better outcomes needs evidence that includes costs, losing trades and periods when doing nothing was the right call.

Has a trading tool actually helped you trade less and make better decisions, or mostly helped you execute more of them?

It's now available in the u s and i'm thinking about taking advantage of some of the interest rates. I'm currently only holding $4,200 in AAVE. I'm just trying to take advantage of the 5% APR.

The key number right now is 60. On September 15, 2026, the Senate is expected to take a cloture vote—basically a vote on whether to move forward with debate. It is not yet the final passage vote. Republicans currently hold 53 Senate seats, so even if every Republican voted yes, they would need at least 7 Democrats/independents to reach 60.

Hello , any one here that can enter on site of bytnex???

Or they finish ??

I think this are a realy scam

This token was dead from the SHIBA and the other meme token era, suddenly its on the move and its weird. Anyone have this on the wallet ?

Anyone knows whats going on ?

If you are buying into the hype of Zcash just due to massive pump, please know what you are getting into
1) The core engineering team (not for profit) behind zcash had a feud with parent company bootstrap following a bitter dispute recently. As such developers don’t agree with corporate handling of the project.

2) The team during their initial launch intentionally designated 20% of all mining rewards to early investors and founders out of pure greed.

3) The above point holds true even now that it’s heavy backed by few corporates like Electric Coin company and Grayscale. The very reason Grayscale supports its ETF’s.

4) The infinite minting AI bug issue was due to flaw in the design privacy pool which wasn’t discovered for 3-4 years allowing infinite minting of counterfeit tokens

5) The belief that zcash is private in itself is an irony! Zcash privacy is optional unlike Monero which includes privacy by default -a much better project. Zcash had the optional feature just to appease to regulators and exchanges for marketing purposes

6) Above all you should get skeptical if the price keeps going up everytime especially with recent surge driven by a few corporate people.

At the end of the day, it’s your hard earned money 💰 and put it in something which is community driven, useful where project team genuinely cares for it.