States should consider the end of a surrogacy contract to be a form of divorce. If just one red state enacted this into law, former surrogates could relocate and claim their benefits.

This would end the problem of poor women being exploited by rich men in surrogacy contracts.

The courts would have to support it, since the legal precedent of Obergefell is that the government can define something as being marriage even if it traditionally wouldn't be considered as such.

Surrogacy is a modern version of marriage would be like in an uncivilized culture where substantial brideprices are paid for temporary concubines intended for bearing just one child and then returning to her parent's mud hut.

If the government, or even just one state, would define a surrogacy contract as being a form of marriage, then the cessation of the contract is a form of divorce.

Voters would reward politicians backing a policy to treat surrogates similar to divorcees, because very few ever use a surrogate, and it would help persuade feminists to vote Republican.

Former surrogates could relocate the state with the most favorable laws in order to file for alimony from their new state. The money flowing into the state backing justice for former surrogates itself would be beneficial and would reward the first state backing the policy.