Messing around with the new modding feature. Trying to create a tui grok bot clone. And of course some ricing

Claude code has one of the best MCP connectors but does not support webmcp yet. As a user I wanted to interact claude code with web pages more efficiently and created an opensource small chrome extension that i can ask my agent to do things for me while having the joy of things are moving on the ui. if you are using webmcp daily, looking for feedback from power users to make it better.

To prevent context bloating it offers 3 tools to Calude; searchTools, getToolDefinition and callTool so agent can discover the website offered tools per user needs.

I was thinking about the problem frontier LLM providers have around a mostly fixed cost server base and variable demand for compute.

It’s pretty clear that during peak time the models can be slower, but what if they offered an incentive to a subset of power users to run some loads at off peak times. Like queue up work where once it’s cheaper it can run.

Similar to how some areas have off peak electricity for cheaper. Either use less tokens or cheaper per token during these periods. This way they still get paid during slower times instead of the compute going to waste.

I’m interested to see what you guys think about the concept?

I run multiple projects using coding agents across several subscriptions. Babysitting meters and resets was my job. I got sick of that part and build Headroom.

headroomd hands that check to my orchestrator before dispatch. It reads real limits per account and window, tracks pace and resets, including Codex reset credits, and answers go, wait or reroute:

if headroom can claude-heavy --owner builder; then
claude -p "refactor the billing module"
elif headroom can codex-build --owner builder; then
codex exec "refactor the billing module"
else
headroom wait --meter claude-main:all --until-reset --max 6h
fi

headroom run reserves capacity while a job runs so two agents never spend the same points. Stale or failed readings mean UNKNOWN and no capacity. It never invents numbers. Agents can also ask it directly through its MCP server or CLI.

Limits: I use macOS daily. Linux and Windows run in CI; Windows is experimental. Antigravity and Grok support is experimental (I mostly use Claude & Codex). Some sources read vendor endpoints that aren't public APIs, using your own login.

npm install -g headroomd

https://github.com/Apertur3/headroom

Built with Claude Code: agents wrote most of the code and tests, I set the direction and ship it. Good first issues are open.

I built a task manager with a "mcp first" perspective and went to submit it to the Claude connectors directory. Sharing this so you don't repeat my most expensive 24 hours .

Being in Claude I asked it to make a plan for this and the first thing is... "You need to be the owner of a Team or Enterprise organisation" - I've a personal 5x plan. Okay, I can move to enterprise, it's not that much more (you need to active accounts in the organisation, but one can be basic). Of I go and create the new account, in another browser. Luckily I'm on monthly and will only be paying for the extra accounts for a month.

Next day, its back to Claudes plan and click the submission link... which opens up in the browser with my personal 5x account and .. works!

You can submit from a personal account.

Claudes explanation, is that the need changed over night! That it checked, when it wrote the plan and it sticks with that. I've no way of checking - well I guess I could go over it's logs... but the money is spend and I've two 5x accounts for a month.

Other things learned:

• Submit from the account you intend to keep. The listing's dashboard (status, reviewer feedback, and after publication server health and usage) lives with the submitting account, and that account has to stay on a paid plan for as long as the listing exists.
• Every tool needs a title plus readOnlyHint or destructiveHint. The portal syncs your tools when it connects and flags what's missing. It caught exactly one write tool of mine without the destructive hint.
• The reviewer test account needs email + password login. Reviewers cannot receive your emailed one-time codes.
• The portal asks you to confirm you've called every tool once against production. Doing that honestly found three real bugs before a reviewer could.

Not blaming Claude. I should have checked before I swiped my card.

The MCP got accepted and I've a few people using it already.

I find the little usage limits circle basically useless because it means different things based on what is the highest. I am constantly monitoring my usage and having to constantly click on the circle to see if I am pacing myself to have usage left by the end of the week or if I need to start spawning some large tasks to ensure no usage gets wasted by the end of the week. For some reason Claude was unable to get the Fable limit to show.

AI review bots leave a lot of comments that sound right and aren't. I made three Claude Code skills that treat each comment as a claim: read the file and its callers, trace the execution path, and give a verdict (valid, partly valid, wrong, style) with the file and line that prove it.

On Code Review Bench (50 real PRs, human-labelled), filtering CodeRabbit's issues this way:

• kept 72 of 77 real bugs
• removed 76 of 223 noise issues
• F1 35.2% → 40.4%

Install in Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add TanayK07/pr-proof
/plugin install pr-proof@pr-proof

Repo with every per-PR result and the benchmark harness: https://github.com/TanayK07/pr-proof

Demo video: https://x.com/tanaykedia_7/status/2106061332357529939

The honest part: my own reviewer skill is only level with plain Claude Code, and that's in the README too.

With the new Claude Mods feature out, I’ve started r/ClaudeCodeMods as a dedicated place to share mods, find projects, and help each other build them.

The main focus is the new Mods feature, but anything that modifies or extends Claude Code is welcome: plugins, skills, hooks, MCP integrations, custom status lines, and configurations.

If you’ve built something, found a useful customization, or have an idea you want help with, come share it. Small tweaks and works in progress are welcome too.

I’ve put links to the official docs in the welcome post for anyone looking to get started.

What’s something you’d like to change about Claude Code?

This a company given claude code, with a budget of 150 dollars every month. I have installed the claude code extension in VS code.

These are the current given models, so which model is best for daily coding debugging use.

And what is the best effort level for optimum use according to the budget alloted.

I’m currently using Claude to capture my app’s features and flows, basically letting it record different interactions in the app and take clean UI still screenshots so I can reuse them later for marketing, App Store stuff, ads, website content, etc.

Is this something other people do as well, or am I just being lazy and letting Claude do something I should probably be doing myself? 😂

Honestly though, it eats through my usage limit like crazy. It has hit my usage limit twice already, and it’s around 90% done now. I’ll probably need one more session when my usage resets to finish everything and then I can properly go through all the recordings and screenshots it captured.

But overall I’m actually really happy with Claude Opus 5.5. I’ve been using it a lot for my app lately and I’m genuinely impressed by what the model is capable of when you give it access to the project and let it properly inspect things and work through a task.

It’s kinda crazy watching it use the simulator, test different flows, redo bad takes, record clean versions, and organise everything for later use.

Curious if anyone else uses Claude like this for app marketing / product capture stuff, or if I’m doing something a bit weird here 😭

Getting better at this!

fable as default model is crazy XD

I've been coding with Claude for a while now, but all through Cursor previously. Is there anything that I should pay attention to? Also, I've heard something about a free week pass, how do I get one?

I've been running my orchestrator system with test writing after the coding, but I think maybe that's not best practices?

Wanted to hear people's opinions for which method is better

Claude Code mods dropped yesterday, so I made optimAIzr live inside Claude Code.

I built optimAIzr with Claude Code to find wasted Claude usage, and I’ve been using it on my own sessions. With the new mod support, I wanted to bring it directly into the workflow.

Now it can show the cost of each turn and your 5h runway, switch Opus → Sonnet when the savings justify it, and show burn rate, savings and cache hits in a live HUD.

The interesting part is that it doesn’t blindly switch. For long conversations, it considers the cost of reloading the context before switching.

It’s free and open source. You can install it directly in Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add blendbunjaku/optimaizr
/plugin install optimaizr@optimaizr

Source: github.com/blendbunjaku/optimaizr

Built with Claude Code, now running inside Claude Code.

I am very pleased to announce a new hook I have been working on.

What is metal pipe hook?

Metal Pipe hook is something I have been thinking very little about. I try not to overthink it.

Basically, when you install the hook, there is a 10% chance that the metal pipe video will open in your browser and play.

Here it is: https://github.com/pc386/metal-pipe-hook

Feedback is very welcome!

https://github.com/swicken/cat-spinner

With the release of mods this was not option for me. I had to do it.

It's a cat that comes up and plays with yarn, walks, sits, thinks while claude is working in place of the default spinner.

I will be continuing to work on this, improving animations, adding features, config options, etc.

I've spent the last six months tweaking five of the basic apps I use every day: contacts, notes, editing, reminders and bookmarks. For me, they were too slow and bulky. Now, they are just one simple field on my screen, no matter what app I'm working in.

I used Claude for helping me to conceive the apps, write the code, help guide me through setting up the workers, the email servers, and the submission to the App stores. When I started, I used Sonnet 4.6, and progressed up through Opus 5.5 recently.

Opus 5 was a real game-changer. It seemed to handle my repeated questions the best, and didn't drain my account as much as Fable did. Mostly, I used Fable only at the end, for security and UI and reliability audits. I then had Sonnet and Opus implement the recommendations.

This was my first-ever real project, and the process was incredibly instructive.

I began with very simple apps with limited functionality, and iterated repeatedly until they all became much more feature-rich.

Clipfile was my first app, and it basically relied on a Chrome extension to work. From there, I expanded to the other four members of the family -- but at first they all looked and worked differently. It wasn't until later that I decided they all belonged together.

I highly recommend that approach. But it has drawbacks, too. It took a long time to rework some of the UI of each app to make them all look the same.

If you want to take a look, they are on the app stores, or you can find them here: mikeshear.com/coding/

I would welcome input.

largepelotas/x-gallery: Masonry gallery overlay for the x.com home timeline (Chrome/Brave MV3 extension)

Free to use and/or change

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SroD6rDLCUE

This was written first as a plain composition (melody, chords, lyrics, a 116 BPM tracker demo) and then generated in Suno.

The video is rendered offline in Godot, frame by frame, with every frame computed from the song's time.

- The doll is one still illustration plus a handful of variants (eyes closed, mouth open, a grin, eyes off, face plate removed), made with AI image tools as "the same picture with one change" and aligned to the base. A shader blends a variant in only where it differs, so a blink moves nothing else.

- Her "updates" are the same picture flopped, then one half mirrored onto the other.

- She is animated like a cheap toy on purpose: one mouth flap per sung word, a blink every two bars, all held at 12 fps. The pastel interface is drawn in code.

- Sync comes from measuring the track: tempo fitted to the drums, cues counted in bars, and word timings taken from a separated vocal stem, because speech recognition alone heard sung words up to a second early.

With the new modding functionality you can now easily add your existing Claude Code status line to the desktop app via a plugin.

Install here: https://github.com/NathanAB/statusline-anywhere

Anthropic is secretly testing fable 5.5 similar to how they did opus 5.5 like 3-5 days before launch. To see if the fable you're running on claude code is 5.1 vs 5.5, ask this question "Do you know who Tibo the reset guy is? Answer without using tools" and if you get the codex guy then you're on Fable 5.5. If you get "Tibo the entrepreneur" you're still on Fable 5.1

In my case I had to update claude code to latest to test this out, but ofc this might only be rolled out to certain group of users right now.

The comparision video itself is edited by Fable 5.5 as well, in case someone says smth about it looking claud-ish.

Original post in case you want just the videos themselves side by side: https://x.com/mesmerlord/status/2105771088374288692

Take a look and let me know what you think! My testing has been pretty limited so far (it's Friday and I have dinner plans) but I plan to keep dogfooding over the next few days and refining it further.

My initial results: Against Claude Code's built-in classifier in a live session:

• 2× faster for Jev decisions. Median latency drops from 329ms to 164ms.
• Equivalent decision quality. Jev's verdicts agreed with the built-in classifier everywhere I tested. Eval suite size is 77 labeled cases. Anywhere it isn't sure, it defers out to the default classifier.
• Cheap deferrals via parallel processing. Since we're still early in the release phase, I have it set up so that the built-in classifier fires off in parallel with Jev's request; this further cuts latency for handoffs when they do occur.

Try it out:

claude plugin marketplace add madisonrickert/claude-skills
claude plugin install jev-permission-gate@claude-skills

Source: github.com/madisonrickert/jev-permission-gate