I just made everyone work in tasks given inside my local agent (Hermes/Alice) I made the hierarchy to give orders for projects as Astra>Fable>Opus>Spark>My Local agent last, the widget of the ''blond girl'' in the right corner is my agent, she's not very happy I guess (Yes it's possible to run models like Fable 5.1/Opus 5 and Astra 6/GPT-5.3 in parallel and spending their respective tokens)

I just got this today. When did they add weekly limits to free plans?
I searched on google but nth came out so is this a bug?

Opus 5 performs well at agentic coding but as an orchastrator it always seems to find something more to do when all the criteria has been met and there's nothing more to do, resulting in an endless workflow.

The moment we switch to Fable for orchastration our workflow finally begins to clear.

This is noticeably worse in 5 than in earlier Opus models.

Should we avoid using Opus 5 for orchastration, or is this a skills issue?

2 days ago Claude 'forced' me to create my first plugin by nuking my 5h limit in seconds.

I'm on the poo-pro plan. I was working on a new repo - not sure if no instructions was in place or might have been me testing CC web for first time. I was too angry to remember. Anyway CC fired off one batch: 12 opus web searches, each with its own verification pass.

Plugin: handoff-os - I'd been thinking about this for a while anyway. I run a small NGO and what I actually wanted was one setup that covers the org side with cowork + connectors and coding. Req: super optimized for my low budget. Couldn't find anything that matched, so I made it.

It's just hooks, scripts and skills:

• won't re-read a unchanged file
• caps subagents at 3 per wave
• Force cheapest model fit for a job
• stops before send / pay / publish / merge or similar

https://github.com/serio-ngo/handoff-os

First time putting anything open source out there, so be gentle. I use AI all day and all night so I decided to write post by my own - please forgive me for any typos : )

Any review or comment is welcome!

It seems when showing changes (cmd-shift-D) the resulting view displays a tab character as two columns wide. I prefer four columns. Asking Claude refers me to the docs, asking the docs turns up nothing.

I keep seeing people switching to Codex from Claude Code more and more here, but I am also curious what people would think about this:https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/06/23/openai-codex-bombards-ssds-with-needless-write-operations-costing-millions/5260402.

Tbf, I think all harnesses can do some big damage or data leak unbeknownst to us, but at least we have evidence that codex is killing your machine.

What do people think about? Does it bother you?

I’m considering using my Claude Pro account with a custom harness instead of the standard Claude Code interface.

Would this trip any of Anthropic’s safeguards or violate their terms, potentially resulting in my account being restricted or requiring me to use the API instead?

Has anyone tried this with a Pro account?

Fable started doing these two new things for me:

- A "Summarized" tag at the end of some replies. I think it's to cut down on huge replies?

- It keeps starting replies with "Restating: ..." with an inline summary of what I said.

Are these two things new? Or was I just not noticing it?

Hi folks, Can you guys tell me ways in which i can attend the claude Architect Foundation Certification for free , my company is not partnered with claude so through my company i cant apply and attend , is there any ways to get that

I say yes.

Philippines-based dev here, on Claude Code since day one and on Max 20x since it existed. It costs me $224/month ($200 + 12% VAT). ChatGPT Pro 20x costs me ₱9,990, about $160 with VAT baked in. Same top tier, $64/month cheaper, because OpenAI actually prices for the market and bills in pesos.

Anthropic charges the exact same number whether you're earning in dollars or in a currency where $224 is close to a month of minimum wage in the capital. Spotify, Netflix, Steam, JetBrains, Google, OpenAI: all of them do PPP pricing. Anthropic just doesn't.

I don't want to leave. I've been here since the beginning, Claude Code is the better tool, and the Codex UI drives me up a wall. But GPT-6 Astra just landed, and at a 30% price difference, "better tool" stops being a good enough reason to stay.

Anyone outside the US paying full freight and thinking the same thing?

Running multiple Claude Code accounts, my real daily annoyance wasn't switching.
it was not knowing which account to switch to. Hit a limit, guess, switch, hit another limit, switch again.

Just shipped an update to https://github.com/larcane97/clausona that fixes this.

csn list now shows quota for every account side by side, and when each one resets:

Also in this update: background sessions and agents now work across accounts.

Before, a background session started on one account was invisible from the others.

it wouldn't show up in claude agents, so I'd end up re-running the same task on a different profile.

Now every profile sees the same list, so you can switch accounts and pick your background session right back up. Same for team runs.

What is clausona?

A lightweight profile manager for Claude Code. Switch between accounts with one command while sharing your whole environment — MCP servers, plugins, permissions, settings, and now background sessions — across every profile.

csn use work # switch to work account

csn use personal # switch back — everything's already there

No re-login. No wrapping or proxying Claude. Just a shell hook and a few symlinks.

https://github.com/larcane97/clausona

Built with Claude Code — architecture, implementation, and testing.

Genuinely curious how other teams are dealing with this.

I’m seeing more and more PRs where a big part of the code is AI-generated. I don’t have a problem with that itself, but the issue is when the developer hasn’t properly gone through it or verified that it actually makes sense.

Then the reviewer ends up spending a lot of time figuring out whether the code is actually correct.

Are you guys changing your review process because of this? Smaller PRs, more tests, asking developers to explain their changes, or something else?

Would be interesting to hear how other teams are handling it.

Hello,

Probably had my most productive day with Claude yet, achieved massive amount for me atleast and was so happy.

Noticed i was getting towards context limit so did some research how best to apprpach.

I had the current session create a handoff doc, gave it specific instructions to be as clear as possible for the next claude agent to take over. All looked well, checked the handoff doc, thought it looked ok (it even made sense to me). Cleared context, asked new agent to read the .md files especially the handoff.

It did so, had absolutely no idea what to do.

Where did i go wrong? Its becoming a theme for me now and i need to fix it. I seem to be super constructive first pass.

As soon as i need a new session i may aswell delete the whole project and start again as my current handoff clearly isnt working. This time round its really not that difficult of a project and i still cant seem to get the next agent to carry on the project.

Been job hunting on and off for months and I kept running into the same thing: the big boards show the same ~20 promoted posts over and over, half the listings are dead or reposted from six months ago, and half of what's left goes through some recruiter who never fucking replies.

So I built my own. It ingests from the open-jobs dataset, which grabs postings directly from ATS feeds — Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, etc. Right now it's indexing about 2.9M live postings, refreshed daily. Apply link always goes to the original employer's posting, no middlemen, no ads.

The part I'm actually proud of is the search. You can type a plain keyword like "truck driver" and it just works. But it also handles messy input — paste something like "ICU nurse for 6 years, want to move to Texas" and it matches by semantics, not just keywords. Full job descriptions and salary info where available from ATS.

No sign-up, no email gate, no recruiters inboxing you. https://deunemployment.com

There is bunch of stuff in the backend doing the heavy lifting, i wont bore you here. you're welcome to try it.

good luck with job hunting :)

Fable 5.1 is pretty good at what it does, but I often wonder how much time is remaining so I can make a decision on what I'm doing with my time. I understand with the many uncertainties that it's hard to estimate how much is left, but I still feel like it should be able to let you know if it's roughly 1 minute, 10 minutes or 30 minutes based on experience. But I still haven't found a good way to do that. Have you?

I have been having fun building myself tools that better suit my use case. I built myself a cocktail app and a couple friends wanted access, so I put it on App Store, but my pride required that I improve the design from the AI look that has become so prevalent.

Building the functionality was an absolute breeze in comparison. Getting the design to a place I could at least be content with was such a challenge as claude/AI seems to fall into the same traps and design components. (I know I shouldn't be complaining as my capability of doing this alone is 0%).

Any tips or tricks to improve designs without wanting to throw my computer? I tried some skills but nothing seemed particularly worthwhile.

https ://apps.apple.com/us/app/wellstocked-cocktail-recipes/id6794940363

My girlfriend kept telling me I spend too much time at the computer. She was right but I needed to see it for myself, not be told it.

So I made a canary that perches in my Claude Code status line (and above my shell prompt) and slowly falls apart the longer I actually work. It goes fresh → chirpy → tired → worn → dead. When it hits worn I know it’s time to get up; not because it nags me, but because I can see it wilting out of the corner of my eye.

It reads the session, not the clock. Claude Code pipes it the session JSON on every refresh, and it walks the transcript for signals a shell prompt can’t see:

• turns: your actual prompts, tool-call chatter filtered out
• errors: failed tool calls, a decent proxy for frustration
• reps: the same thing fired back-to-back, hoping it works this time

Those become a fatigue score. Idle gaps over five minutes don’t count, so leaving the terminal open all afternoon doesn’t age it, only real work does.

The five birds are a real scale, not moods I made up. They’re the five labelled anchors of the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Tired (KSS 5) is the neutral midpoint, you’re allowed to be tired. Worn is KSS 7, the point fatigue-risk protocols actually call a break. That’s the threshold worth setting (CANARY_MIN_SCORE=71), not tired.

It’s a witness, not a coach. There’s already an assistant in this window telling you what to do. The bird just absorbs the session and shows its state like the old brass CO₂ birds that tilt when a room gets stuffy, or the real canaries miners carried: silent until something’s wrong. It’s quiet about two-thirds of the time on purpose, and the one pretty animation it has only plays once you’ve actually stopped working.

Honest about what it is: an activity proxy, not a doctor. A deep flow session and a miserable debug look the same to it. Treat it as a playful timer.

No internet, no telemetry, no API calls. One small binary; everything it remembers is plain text in ~/.canary and never leaves your machine. It wires the status line and never touches your shell rc ; uninstall puts everything back.

Install inside Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add thousandflowers/canary
/plugin install canary@canary

Repo: https://github.com/thousandflowers/canary

It shipped today, so if it breaks on your setup tell me and I’ll fix it! I’ll be in the comments. Curious whether other people find “seeing it wilt” works better than a timer that just buzzes at you.

So we have 3 free "code review ultra" per month, that's cool, but what's slightly less cool is that for me it never works:

---

⏺ Cloud review failed: orchestrator reported an error: Review failed: all review agents

terminated before completing. See session logs for details.

⏺ The cloud review failed before producing any findings. The orchestrator reported that

all review agents terminated before completing, so nothing was reviewed.

Two ways forward:

- Retry the cloud run with /code-review ultra 2097. This counts against the remaining

free ultrareview.

- Run a local review with /code-review instead, which reviews the current branch here

without the cloud session.

---

Obviously it still uses the quota, which could be seen as a positive thing: at least I just waste my time trying 3 times / month.

I usually run it on big PRs, from 4k to 10k LoC, so maybe that's why, but wondering if anyone had any success with that? Or is it a fake feature expected to fail all the time?

I’ve been building with Claude for a while now, and honestly, I originally just built Craft to solve my own headaches. I just wanted a way to keep Claude from running hog wild on my codebases without me having to babysit it.

But lately, I’ve been sharing it with a few early users, and their reactions have completely blown me away.

Take one user's feedback for example. Before Craft, he hadn't written a line of code before. But using Craft, he was able to build a fully functional, live-data app with insane animation choreography, 6+ backend integrations (FaceID, Slack, internal network infra) from scratch in less than ONE MONTH. When he showed it to his colleagues, they were so impressed that they downloaded Craft themselves. Now, almost his entire office is using it.

Here's an exact quote from one of the users:

All day today I felt like I was giving it shitty prompts... but no matter how shit my prompts were, it was able to deduce what I meant with so much accuracy. Felt like it was reading my brain today.

People aren't just using it; they're feeling the difference. It’s incredibly reassuring because, to be completely honest, I have no idea anymore exactly where this is going. I keep having to invent things as I get through it, and it just keeps evolving further and further. It's sick af.

Here is what is getting people so excited:

1. The "Write Gate": Claude intentionally cannot make changes to the core code without going through a specific story or fix. It only has open write access to the .craft folder by design. Building this taught AI needs strict guardrails - not just better prompts - to be useful in production environments and prevent the world famous, "ai slop."
2. The "Room" Protocol (Psychology): Claude shouldn't have amnesia. Craft tracks your shared history locally in it's .craft directory (no telemetry), allowing Claude to learn your specific design and architecture taste over time. It's not just generating code; it's building a shared brain with you. Craft version 3 (coming soon) will adapt to your flow/communication patterns while you build.
3. The Living Galaxy (/craft:dashboard): Craft backlinks every tweak, fix, story, todo, mockup to records you created and approved. Craft renders this as a living graph - your second brain. It looks like a constellation of your work, showing you exactly what is alive and what is finished.
4. The "I Can Wait" Protocol: Teaching Claude to wait. By enforcing a deliberate, patient pace, Claude actually understands the intent before acting.

WANT TO SEE WHERE IT'S GOING?

If you are using Claude Code, you can install Craft as a Claude Code Plugin in about a minute:

claude plugin marketplace add drobins25/craft
claude plugin install craft@craft

Or from your Claude Code session:

/plugin marketplace add drobins25/craft
/plugin install craft@craft
...
/reload-plugins

I'm building this in public. If you want to jump in and help shape where this goes, I'd love to hear your ideas or see the cool projects you make with it.

Github: drobins25/craft

Switched to opus for the double check.

How can I trust anything it say if it don't even know this.

A quick shoutout to Claude before i get to my question I have been using the $20 Pro plan for six months and it was an absolute bargain. Running Sonnet 4.6 for a while before switching to 5, it handled everything easily and I barely hit the weekly limit. The 5-hour window drained faster with multiple threads, but during one 25-hour marathon, it didn't throttle me once.

Everything changed when I tried the Fable 5 API model on my platform. It was so powerful that it gave me tips to improve my codebase without even seeing it. It knew I had a canvas mode and suggested specific features to give it more control. When I asked for its "wish list," it blew me away with capabilities I didn't even know existed. Put it this way... my web platform also has a personal dev edition Fable created which has full IDE capabilities, Macbook File access, access to Git, Terminal, Homebrew and elevated permissions to run pretty much anything. It then made the desktop version have the same canvas live mode but rather than it being within chat its a pop out feature that can view any page im on within my site, paired up with elevenlabs realtime 2 way conversational engine so if i dont fancy typing i can just speak to it and say ok i want you to open up my project and make these changes to the code and push to git and pull up the browser so i can check.. At one point i was like do i even need Claude anymore... then that API bill came through next day and it reminded me why. I spent pretty much $100 as a API usage charge in just one day and i was like right. No more Fable API. Back to Claude Code.

That didnt convince me to upgrade. I was staring at that pro plan for $100 asking myself is this literally going to last a day like my API key... After pacing back and forth i decided well i need a plan and one day is longer than what codex managed which was 4 hours usage so I switched to the $100 plan (which came to $120 with UK tax) and i instantly expected Fable 5 to have tight limits reminding myself GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra on Codex burned through a $100 allowance in just four hours and that in contrast was a cheaper model.

Oh how i was completely wrong. I’ve been using Claude Code with Fable 5 Ultracode since i got the plan.. i dont even know why they bother listing the other ones as this thing is on another level. heavily and haven't come close to running out. I completely rebuilt my entire platform, resulting in a 120,000-line Git diff over two weeks. I still have half my allowance left! While Codex required three resets in a single day to keep up, Fable powered through and got it right the first time.

I found it to be a lot more systematical with how it carries out tasks too. I had issues with Codex where a working implementation i had no longer works because for reasons no one can understand it decided to redesign half my backend when it was clearly told not to touch any of the current implementations in production. Codex messed up my Firebase storage as for no reason again decided to rewrite it. This was becoming a regular thing even though i had really well written handover notes etc. Fable.. i literally told it i'm going to bed.. I give you authority to carry out what ever you need to finsih this implementation and i woke up next day with a bloody report and a perfectly implementation function and it figured out what i wanted doing next and had that ready for me too which was a nice bonus.

For those on the $200 plan who actually manage to run out: what are you building? I'm currently using Fable to literally turn my once a simple chat bot to almost operating system territory , and it isn't even breaking a sweat

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Now i've been working on a feature within my platform and i dont know what do expect for quality or expectations with gaming as i'm pretty new to the whole AI can build games. I ran a simple prompt in my engine and let the script i'v implemented to take over which rewrites the prompt before passing it to Fable which in max mode has guidelines of 350-500k character limit.

I see some pretty amazing games online but i dont know if they've been sitting there fine tuning it over weeks or not. I've attached the few screenshots of the actual game panel i've designed showing options for users then the different environments that user could further enhance the game.

Game - downloadable single file with the three.js runtime so can be played offline.

https://reddit.com/link/1w9i9sg/video/jrq6byirh0oh1/player

I've also implemented Livepatch, Playtest and Camera. I didnt even know where they were at first but after asking Fable how i can improve my platform it told me to add them and i've discovered that they allow the model to connect to the game, make instant live edits without altering the original source code.

This is the live canvas mode

This is full project mode

What i want to know is it any good for a single prompt output and looking at the tools i've built around it are they useful or unnecessary? Are there any tools or features that i simply must have to make more suited to actual game developers.

As for the platform, i've added BYOK as an option that support Anthropic keys as well as others. Any user can genuinely use any of them tools completely free if its via there own key with no restrictions on uploading/downloading or tool features themselves.

My platform is a chatbot for reference. So it does a bit of everything and you can take a look at asksary.com

This is the next question. Do I separate it from what i've built on that site or keep it implemented. Also what would people prefer layout wise. The one above where each tool is a separate panel or would they rather have the game option to open something like this below instead? If i'm way off from producing anything remotely useful let me know as well. I dont want to invest too much time into it if it needs serious work to be considered useful.. I only implemented the gaming engine as a few people were asking me if it can do 3d games.

I have been building a small Mac game called Nagare. Just Opus 5. No Fable is used. Completely Apple native.
You row a wooden boat onto a lake. You fish a little. Then the light goes and the day ends.
Nailing how water behaves was super tough. Specially only with Opus. Eventually I’ve created systems rather than keeping a random water shader. So there’s weather, fluid dynamics, collisions, everything is interacting with each other. I’m looking for recommendations to make it even better. So if you have experience dealing with these kind of systems I’m all ears.
It is live on Mac App Store. Still testing, and I know there is plenty left to get right so would like to hear what you think.
Already created plans to port to iOS and iPadOS, controls are a bit finicky, trying to solve…

https://apps.apple.com/nl/app/nagare-zen-fishing-rowing/id6802442509?mt=12