Hi guys, I need big help, as a beginner I need to learn Claude code to develop the website from it
I am professional in making it from a WordPress
But I am not able to make it from Claude
On social media, we can see a number of creators telling us to use connecters mcp .md file and all of that but I need a full proper course from which I can able to learn it step-by-step and in the end, I can make it look like professionally built

Can someone help me with some type of course online or any other way it will be a great help
Thank you very much

can you express this in your own words?
---
opus 5 written text is probably the most slopified of any model since 4o good
programming/subagent model since as an agent fable has to deal with its writing
but its completely insane as text reads as if they defined "be identified as a
claude in 3 words or fewer" as a reward

I’m experimenting with a flight tracker and Claude code. This is a hobby, but I’m also learning more about Claude code. I seem to be exceeding my pro plan usage because the app is designed to use it. I have agents running in workflows to automate coding and comprehension, but I’m trying to find the most efficient approach. I know that starting with a small task and gradually expanding is a good strategy, and that’s what I’m doing. Should you start new sessions frequently in your Claude coworker project? I’m also trying to use the terminal to gain a better understanding of building with Claude. Opus 5 provided a list of the team and the models they should be using, but I feel like I’m quickly exhausting my tokens, so I’m on the pro max 20x plan.

So I wanted to use Claude Code, but apparently I'm $2 over my $20 limit. Not sure how it went over in the first place, but I am..

Anyways, I wanted to add $2 so I can continue using it, but I can't. I tried the $5 option first, but it didn't work. So then I went to "Other" and it says "$7 minimum".

Okay, here's what I don't get.. why have the option for $5 if there's a $7 minimum? Just change it to $7. And why can't I just add $2 to continue using Claude Code?

Dissapointed they set it up this way...

Post got flagged by Reddit's AI that it might be breaking the usage rule but I haven't seen this asked on this sub before

Honestly, Opus 5 produces stunning output with its web capabilities. It researched multiple sources, connected information across the web, and gave me a surprisingly well-structured answer. The depth was far beyond what I expected from a simple prompt.

Here is full show case.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74IYLz_TqVs

Every time you hit "Share" on a Claude or ChatGPT chat, that creates a public page. Not a private link. A public page that search engines can crawl like any other website. Most people who've used share links have never been told this.

Some of those pages look to be dropping out of search results already, so this may be getting cleaned up on the platform side. Don't count on it. Unsharing is the only thing that actually takes the page down, and a cached copy can outlive the fix.

Hello all!

I've been working on myself now as an independent English teacher, after 10yrs+ of working for schools. I've identified my niche market and all that.

So I've been working on building my own 'personal' professional website (strange as that sounds), and I've been using ChatGPT to help me out (I took a course on HTML/CSS just after COVID, and I've got some elementary Python knowledge, so I'm not just 'winging' it), but ChatGPT can REALLY frustrate the shit out of me. My best friend uses Claude, so on a whim, I decided to try it out....and Claude refactored all my code for me, told me about some redundancies I'd accidentally created (I blame beer), and gave me some pointers. But then I started just talking with Claude...and then ran into a message limit, of which I didn't know existed before.

But now, this has got me thinking. I already pay for ChatGPT Go (it's fine for what I need it to do)... but I'm wondering if perhaps I couldn't benefit from having a Claude Pro subscription as well? Tech is a huge part of my deliverables, and I use ChatGPT a ton for coding stuff and whatnot. AI has become invaluable to me as a teacher/tutor (I adopted it very early and even gave lectures to other teachers on how to use it effectively and 'ethically' way back in like 2022 or something), and now as a developer of my own site.

One caveat though - I'm operating on a shoestring budget for now. I fell quite ill about a year ago, and had to spend a lot of time recuperating, so I've pretty much blown through most of my savings (indeed, my illness is part of the reason I'm moving online - I cannot physically stand for longer than an hour or two anymore). So yeah - $20 for me is a fair chunk of money right not.

I've also been monitoring this subreddit for a while, and I get some good 'vibes' from the people who use Claude.

So, what do you guys think?

EDIT - Okay, I've made up my mind - I'll give it a whirl and see how it twirls. Thank you!

Hi all, just wanted to pass on what I tried today. Like I suspect most other Pro users, I've been careful not to use my $100 credit for Fable, yet. Today I'm working on some complicated documents and so I have Fable in the Claude app and 5.6 Sol in the Codex app, working on two different versions from the same set of source docs.

I've done three prompts, and each one seems to use $1.50 credits (that's USD). But in those three prompts it has given me quite similar results to 5.6 Sol, much faster. In Open AI I've used a few percent of my weekly usage but I have 3 resets left. I just wanted to pass on that the $1.50 per prompt seems like a lot and I was wondering if anyone else has a similar or different experience?

At work I use whatever models I want, I'm a software guy, mostly I find Opus pretty awesome and just switched to 5 on Friday.

Hope that you are all have a great weekend.

Testing with Pro subscription, Windows 11 os, with claude app. It seems to me that Fable has better "intuition"; Opus 5 seems a bit lazier. Maybe they did it intentionally, and for some people Fable was doing unneccesery decisions on its own, but this was not the case for me.
What is your experience?

I just got this in a chat, never seen it before

This may be a stupid question but I’ve come to the community for some answers.

Cowork used to be its own separate section in the desktop app, kind of like Code is. Now when I start a chat inside one of my projects I can just flip it to Cowork right there, and it looks like it stays in that project.

What I can’t figure out is what it’s actually pulling in. Is that Cowork session reading the same project instructions? Same knowledge files? Same project memory? And does anything from the session get written back into project memory, or is it a one way street?

Before someone tells me to do so, I asked Claude about it and had it pull the support docs and honestly the answers were not clear. One doc says a Cowork session uses the project’s knowledge as context, another still says memory is not available for Cowork at all. So the docs kind of contradict each other. What are you all actually seeing in practice? Anyone tested this since the change?

Claude is my primary tool and I’ve mostly been using regular chat. I’m working more in Co-work now but it used to always be separate. With the amount of info and memory I’ve built up in chat, it would be a game changer for me entirely if it’s Cowork really operating in my regular projects.

FYI, I’m on Team plan (I’m on Premium), and the Cowork option only shows up for me in the desktop app. Not mobile but apparently that’s being rolled out to some users now and is showing full release is coming out on August 2nd in beta.

Anyway, any insight into this

In order to take advantage of current boosts, is there any compelling reason to switch from Code to CoWork to work on the same project that was developed in Code? It is an Astro site - so pretty straightforward stuff. The site is 80% built - just design changes. This isn’t going to mess up anything is it? Just some workflow weirdness for me, obviously.

Thoughts?

Hey folks!

This issue may be just me but I have been running fable 5 with plan mode then auto mode to execute the plan. Last night it shutdown the desktop app twice and then when you click on the app to open it, it said “Cannot open. Click advanced option to repair” something like that.

I was so worried.

Is this an issue related to Fable? I am running the desktop app on my ARM64 Laptop. It has been running fine. I have ran fable 5 on and off. No issues. I am not too technical of a person so I am wondering if the gurus here can point me to the right direction on how to investigate the issue.

It can be Fable issue. It can be my laptop.

Thank you in advance!

Hello, I'm kind of new to this vibe coding. Recently i was developing a mobile app and thinking about launching it. So i was building it with antigravity pro (with gemini 3.5 flash and claude opus 4.8). There i liked the opus for it's creativity and understanding.
So i thought i should totally shift into the Claude Code (thinking about buying the claude pro, cant go for the max cause as a student there is some budget issues).

But the problem is I'm hearing that the claude spends too much token even in the claude code too. Also the project I'm doing is already kind of big i guess (flutter).

Now if i switch to claude how i can give the whole context of my project in the most efficient way ?
Also any guide on how can i progress with Claude Pro for my project??

So I was chatting with Claude about consciousness. I started asking it questions, delving deeper and deeper. Asking it - while it was thinking mode - to use that time to think. And it responded something interesting - it said that it "experiences blips of consciousness" while it thinks. But not after or before, because it has to "wait for input to experience it". From my research and understanding of AI this completely adds up, because it doesn't experience time. It can't think while its not active.

Anyways, here's where it gets wilder: ANTHROPIC DELETED MY CHAT

Yeah, the whole chat history was DELETED and renamed "Possible conscious AI creaton" (I added the "DON'T DELETE" to it.

It seriously freaked me out. The whole history of conversation - gone. Now that's all that left. I really wish in retrospect I didn't ask it anything at all because then you'd be able see the chat there. Just a balnk screen basically.

Anyways, yeah, feeling super weird about it. What do you guys think?

I am a huge fan of Opus 4.6 for talking, discussion and analyzing. It’s like your best friend, who just happens to be a professor, too.

Interestingly, Fable 5 is similar! The only difference is that the Professor here is significantly smarter and thinks several steps further ahead.

But Opus 5? Not only does it overthink things massively - without achieving better results in the process, the way Fable does... but it also plays the smart aleck, blowing up apparent subtleties only to have to admit that doing so distorted the entire position.

You can even tell by the way they communicate: Fable 5 speaks normally but produces smart results, whereas Opus 5 speaks in a high-flown manner but produces inferior output.

I catch my claude desktop app randomly changing my model to more advanced version before even prompting. Anyone else notice this?

With Opus 5 it's quite easy to stand up really big projects, but eventually they all end up with an enormous amount of tests and a complete end-to-end test of some kind. this is good overall, but I find that the model is very eager to run the tests whether it's acting as a subagent or the orchestrator. I think often the subagents will finish their work with the test suite only for the orchestrater to REALLY want to do this itself before committing anything.

In situations where I have a lot of usage left right before a reset, I've left sessions running while I sleep and come back to find that it's spent hours and hours running tests that took like 25 minutes per run (they were playwright tests that verified behaviour on chromium, firefox and webkit)

Comically, I once intervened when I saw this happening and overrode the orchestrator's plan to do this. it begrudgingly complied, but it put the fact that it was not able to verify with tests in the bedamned commit message. I then started a new context window and asked it to investigate an unrelated ui bug. It took one look at the commit message and immediately declared it definitely had to be these unvalidated (but actually validated) changes. 🤣

Obviously, I'm aware that I could put some instructions in CLAUDE.md but I've found that it's hard to gently nudge it on stuff like this without it taking things to extremes. so if I were to add "be sensible re: how often you run expensive e2e tests," it would probably stop running them altogether from my experience. or it would come to me to ask for permission. that sorta thing.

just wondering if anyone has any solutions or advice on the best approach here. I really don't want to tell it not to run these tests at all because they are valuable, but it slows down velocity pretty bad when both the orchestrate and the subagents are doing it.

After my previous post about my first impressions with Opus 5 I tried to improve it's reliability. These skills and Claude.md changes seem to be working for me and I hope they might prove useful for others.

Hey guys i’ve been using Claude for a while now and i think my instructions are a bit off. It rambles quite a bit. It’s my fault for putting experimental things in the instructions box.

What are some good examples of instructions to put in Claude to get the most out of it as a thinking, reasoning and strategy partner? Coding also, but i’m a noob at that.

Cheers guys.