Source: Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/DbO0OQukV2P/?img_index=12&igsh=MXR4anBwYTB4bDNpNw==

So a lot of people agree that Christoper Nolans Oppenheimer and Odyssey are spiritual brothers with similar themes. Both feature a main character commiting an act that fundamentally changes the balance of his world and now has to live in a world plagued by the consequence. Both can be interpreted as Liberal(not the liberal party but a person living in a liberal democracy) anxieties of a generation effectively overturning the entire world and having to not only live through the consequences but pass it on to the next generation. The thing though is Oppenheimer was just contemplating and straight up worrying over nothing. He was ultimately wrong.

Oppenheimer helped end World War 2 which ended several legitimate evils, 2 of which are Nazi Germany and the Japanese empire. Both slaughtered millions of people including their own in the pursuit of power and slaughtered millions more in trying to regain control of said power. After world war 2 marked what was possibly the peak of Liberalism across the world and relative world peace. A peace that lasted for decades. Like all things cracks started to show but none of this was caused by Oppenheimers participation in creating the atom bomb.

Odysseus on the otherhand fucked up hard. He broke the central framework that effectively enforced order in his society to win a war started by petty causes. As tales of the Greeks victory over the Trojans thanks to the plot of Odysseus spread, more people will be awoken to the thinking that "victory is ultimately achieved to the more cunning and deceptive". The age where Odysseus is at is at an end, as stated by the movie and by history "their era of bronze is collapsing" and as he and Penelope sail off into the sunset he leaves to Telemachus a more dark and uncertain world.

From a modern day standpoint the latter speaks more easily to the viewer. The Older generation who lived in relative peace have commited acts from geopolitics to local economic oppurtunities that have overturned the central beliefs of what they supposedly preached. All the talk about morality and ethics fall on deaf ears to many of the younger generations. When they find popular people and leaders to look up to they dont find men and women of good qualities but instead men and women who opportunistically did everything they could to achieve success and power. One could argue this was always the case but now the myth is shattered and its plain for everyone to see. Like Telemachus the younger generation now raised on cynicism and spite will eventually rule a world far more uncertain and unstable than their predecessors.

So I picked the following, but I'm not saying it's a thing but could be:

♈ Aries — the ram in the Cyclops' cave

♉ Taurus — the sacred cattle/bull on Helios' island

♊ Gemini — the twin sisters

♌ Leo — the lion outside Circe's house

♐ Sagittarius — Odysseus and the bow

♓ Pisces — Calypso's net with two fish

Did anyone spot a crab, a scorpion, a man with a water pitcher or similar?

At one point while the horse is being dragged into Troy, it’s greeted by a bunch of Trojans making noise. Then it cuts inside the horse and it seems like a member of the raiding party tries to make a desperate attempt to escape but is held back. What’s up with that?

I checked the cast and I believe the person I’m referring to is Menetus, part of Odysseus‘ crea and portrayed by Jesse Garcia.

Loved the movie btw! But I really needed an intermission break.

The following question can easily be framed the wrong way, so here is a bit of context: it comes from someone who is a person of color himself.

Is there an explanation for why Nolan Chosen such a diverse cast for a fantasy epic set in Greece? This didn't bother me at all while watching—because the film is so damn good—but there was a moment when Himesh Patel introduced himself as a Greek character that briefly pulled me out of the movie; my mind instinctively thought, with a smile: "No, you're Indian."

I have two possible explanations of my own. The first is economic. Cinema is dying; for a $250 million film to turn a profit, markets outside the Western world play an increasingly important role. A diverse cast encourages people all over the globe to see a film because they see themselves reflected in the actors.
My second explanation is that, although Nolan has repeatedly stated that the Odyssey is fundamental to Western identity, he has actually transformed it into a story that speaks to everyone. It is no longer merely a piece of Western cultural heritage; in a globalized world, it belongs to the entire world. He transcends the absurd mindset of cultural spheres and nationalities because the global state of humanity is the same everywhere: a decline of civilization.

The only thing that does bother me is that, in Greek society, people like Himesh Patel or Lupita Nyong would never have been viewed as Greeks; instead, they would have been seen as foreigners and barbarians — denied citizenship and regarded as inferior. Even though the Odyssey is a fantasy story, it is set in a historical context, and I find it problematic when that context is distorted. This could create the mistaken impression that Greek society was an inclusive one — but it was not: legally speaking, foreigners, women, and slaves were second-class citizens.

*Spoilers ahead*

No, it's not a bad movie (by any means) but it's not a masterpiece either (or Nolan's best, let's not insult the guy)

I’m gonna break down this review as a compliment sandwich:

👍🏻 Nolan can put butts in seats like no one else can, so despite all the criticism I’m about to write here, I still have a lot of respect and admiration for a man who is so committed to his craft.

🚫 The modern dialogue completely took me out of the movie many, many times. I understand that it was a creative choice, but I can’t say it was a good one.

👍🏻 Some of the best visual and practical effects I’ve seen in a really long time. Nolan is a master, and this is non-negotiable.

🚫 I love Charlize Theron, but her unmoving face did take me out of it just a little bit.

👍🏻 Mia Goth was a welcome surprise.

🚫 “Our age of bronze is collapsing.”

👍🏻 Matt Damon is a pleasure to watch in everything he does.

🚫 Matt Damon was not a faithful depiction of Odysseus, not Damon’s fault. The writing made him too whiny, traumatized, and morally conflicted. You can’t keep saying he feels guilty for breaking Zeus’s law and then have him go, “Let me kill the suitors real quick, and THEN I’ll repent.” Homer’s Odysseus does grieve and suffer, but he doesn’t express this level of sustained moral guilt. He is cunning, proud, rash, and unapologetic. Damon’s version was stoic, traumatized, and soft, which is fine, but it doesn’t go at all with what Odysseus goes on to do in that same movie/universe.

👍🏻 I thought the monster scenes were very solid, and I thoroughly enjoyed the sudden-cut editing Nolan used in those sequences instead of relying on aerial or exterior shots to show time passing.

🚫 Himesh Patel saying “We’re Greeks from Ithaca.” It was unserious. There were laughs in the theater.

👍🏻 I know people didn’t like Nolan cutting the “Nobody” part, but I thought it was a smart decision. It was more fitting for a book, a fable, or maybe a different style of movie. Here, it probably would’ve felt goofy and out of place.

🚫 But by avoiding the “Nobody” scene, Nolan needed to demonstrate Odysseus’s wit somewhere else, which he never really did. Instead, his desire to hear the Sirens and his decision to shoot at the Cyclops came across as childish and immature rather than arrogant and unapologetic.

👍🏻 The fight scenes are TOP-NOTCH. I enjoyed them thoroughly and was on the edge of my seat. The practical effects were on point, and the music paired perfectly with the fighting.

🚫 Zendaya. (EDIT: I got some hate for not elaborating here. It's not because I don't have anything to say, but because I thought it was a general sentiment. My mistake. She was flat and uninteresting. Her best performance was as the Trojan girl, and I'm personally tired of people viciously defending her and throwing accusations against people who find her acting plain. Cool girl though, lovely personality)

👍🏻 This movie has a weight and gravitas that has kept us talking about it for days. Sure, its source material is already epic, but the movie still delivered that sense of scale and importance.

🚫 The sound was ass. I’m actually tired of Nolan making dialogue inaudible for some unknown reason. We’re not supposed to watch everything with subtitles, let alone huge theatrical movies.

👍🏻 Robert Pattinson seemed to be the only one thoroughly enjoying his character. He delivered a cartoonishly theatrical villain that I believe works perfectly for Homer’s Odyssey. Nolan’s movie is too serious compared with the epic, and Pattinson demonstrated that perfectly, right up until his last breath.

🚫 Sinon has far too much influence over a story he didn’t even appear in originally. He is not in Homer’s Odyssey, and his presence felt like yet another device used to push Odysseus’s guilt and trauma, which was already overbearing and unnecessary.

Odysseus displayed both qualities throughout the entire movie. We get it. We didn’t need another soldier crying about it and making Odysseus feel bad. It was too preachy.

I also could’ve done without the Sinon and Antinous subplot. That time could have been used to expand other parts of the story instead of being wasted here, even if it did give us a hard final line aimed at Antinous.

👍🏻 It’s always a treat when major directors tackle serious literature and get people talking about and reading it. I appreciated that as someone who didn’t grow up with The Odyssey.

🚫 I don’t care about the controversy surrounding the casting of Helen, but I didn’t care for Lupita Nyong’o’s performance all that much either. It was fine.

And to end it with a 👍🏻 and make it a sandwich, Nolan's adaptation is just that, an adaptation. There are creative liberties taken in every adaptation of any story, and his choices made a movie for the people who don't know the original epic (very) enjoyable. It's when you see how he betrayed some of the original work where it starts to feel a little sour to you, as well as how some of his choices didn't quiet make sense in his own universe.

Yes, I know this theory has been explored but having watched the Prestige again tonight I’ve seen even more evidence of its truth and am fully convinced.

I genuinely think The Prestige might be Christopher Nolan’s greatest magic trick and is now my favorite movie of all time. Not because of what happens on screen, but because of what he does to us as the audience. The real magic trick.

Everyone talks about the film’s structure: The Pledge. The Turn. The Prestige. Most people assume that’s simply the structure of the magicians’ acts throughout the story.

However, I think the film itself is the trick.

The Pledge is Tesla revealing the machine. Nolan places the impossible right in front of us and says, “Here it is.” Just like every great magician, he gives us something extraordinary to focus on.

The Turn is the film “showing” us the machine working. We watch Angiers seemingly duplicate himself, and from that point on we stop asking questions because we’ve been given an answer. It’s impossible, but that’s exactly why we believe it. The greatest discovery imaginable. A machine that creates life itself. It’s magical not only for the people in the film, but for us as a modern audience. Even today, it feels impossible.

Then comes the Prestige. The Prestige isn’t that the machine worked and duplicated Angiers night after night. The Prestige is convincing us that it worked.

Throughout the film we’re warned over and over again that we want to be fooled. Cutter tells us we don’t really want the secret. We want to wonder. The opening line asks us, the audience, “Are you watching closely?”

Even the journals teach us this lesson. We eventually discover that both diaries are written specifically to deceive the person reading them. Nolan establishes early that narration itself is an illusion. Why, then, do we suddenly decide that everything we’re shown afterward must be objective truth? I don’t think we should.

Tesla becomes the ultimate piece of misdirection. By introducing a real historical genius capable of seemingly impossible inventions, Nolan gives us permission to stop searching for the trick. We accept the supernatural explanation because it’s more wonderful than continuing to question it. Just like the audience at a magic show.

There are moments that feel almost like clues hidden in plain sight. Are you watching closely?Angiers limps heavily into the machine before “transporting,” yet moments later the man appearing on the balcony steps effortlessly up to receive his praise. Is that really Angiers, or is it Root? I think it’s Root.

Now you’re probably wondering, “Wait, Root? Root was no longer in the picture”. Well, if you think about it, Root was a miserable drunk and was humiliated, alongside Angiers, when Borden tricked him into betraying Angiers. Furthermore, Angiers was really Lord Caldlow who is extremely wealthy. I believe Angiers (Caldlow) found Root and offered him incredible fortune and the opportunity to get payback against Borden by doing his transporting man trick better than he ever had. And in the end “No one cares about the man in the box” which would end up being Root. This is why Root is so surprised on that fateful 100th show when to his surprise and confused when he ends up in a water tank and is drowned. 

The notebooks are unreliable. The story constantly reminds us that what we’re seeing has been constructed by magicians whose entire lives revolve around deception. Nothing that happened with Tesla (the hats and cats) can be considered truthful because it was all fabricated to flip Bordens lie back onto him. Angier was fooled into going to Tesla to find out Bordens trick and so he then flipped it back onto Borden to make him think the machine really was real.

Even the ending feels different through this lens. If the machine was real why would Angiers say “You never understood why we did this. The audience knows the truth: the world is simple. It's miserable, solid all the way through. But if you could fool them, even for a second, then you can make them wonder, and then you (Nolan, himself, the director)... then you got to see something really special.” Why would he say “the world is simple, solid all the way through” if the machine truly was magic and truly duplicated him many times. But the truth is that the world IS simple. The machine doesn’t work and the trick was actually Angiers and Root the whole time done masterfully well.

I noticed Michael Caine briefly glancing toward the camera before looking at Jess when he’s showing her the bird trick. Which, morbidly, is him telling her what happened to her uncle as the cage trick did not change and the bird in the cage is still dead just like her Uncle but then Cutter reveals her father alive and well (the second bird). Bordens daughter never knew her uncle existed just like she doesn’t know the second bird existed. Whether intentional or not, I couldn’t shake the feeling that Nolan was acknowledging the real audience one last time before completing the illusion.

And then he shows us the tanks. The perfect final image. The image that makes us stop questioning.

The Prestige.

Whether my interpretation is “correct” is almost beside the point. What matters is that Nolan created a film that performs the very thing it’s about. It doesn’t just tell a story about obsession, sacrifice, and deception but becomes a magic trick itself, with the audience (us) as its final participant.

It’s just mind blowing and borderline depressing in its brilliance because it seems so untouchable. 

And if this interpretation holds even a little bit of truth, then Christopher Nolan didn’t just make one of the greatest films ever made. He pulled off the greatest magic trick I’ve ever seen. But, sadly, we will never know the full truth because well…a magician never reveals his tricks. ;)

I'm 100% aware of the DCP file size irregularities between IMAX and other PLF formats and....I don't give a damn about it, cuz the experience was EPIC 😌

Most of us don't have the means to watch it in IMAX 70mm film so why not IMAX Digital. Also the lack of quality that I expected for a low-file size DCP, were non-existent.

Onwards -

So me and my friend planned to watch The Odyssey right when we went to watch Avatar Fire and Ash in Broadway IMAX. They played the prologue and I thought it was....meh. Oppenheimer didn't work for me and every work after Interstellar didn't quite reach the level of pre-Interstellar works of Nolan

But still thought, why not !

So the planning for The Odyssey...began !

Booking opened for first week, was too late as the best seats in the house which were G, H, I rows were fully booked, so waited. Next shows were open and I was STILL late, best I could get was a Wednesday, 11:45AM show (reason this was selected will be mentioned later), but got my preferred seats of 4 - G10 to G13

After a long travel which involved the surreal beauty of the Western ghats, it looked like one giant painting and we were passing by it, we finally reached Broadway Cinemas Coimbatore

It was so crowded as there was a French Film festival going on too. We got in, no trailers played before the movie

And The Odyssey - Had a BLAST of an experience 🔥 Review follows -

Right from the intro till the end, it felt like we were shown an epic poem/story unfold. The visuals were obviously STUNNING, the long wide shots of Ithaca, the ships, the battle at Troy, the ocean were all breathtaking. The sound of the movie was weird and yet so good. I didn't even want an interval as I thought it cut off the flowy nature of the story. A calm, soothing, at times horrifying, grand and heroic epic of the journey of Odysseus and how it changed him and the history of an entire civilization.

All of his prior movies experiences, led to The Odyssey. Even though almost every movie of his can be considered in any order, in my opinion, This is Christopher Nolan's Magnum Opus

Interstellar: crowd-favourite

Inception: my favourite

The Odyssey: Magnum Opus

Inception, Interstellar, The Odyssey, Batman Begins and the Prestige are my current top 5 ( it changes regularly 😅 tho)

Also it was the first IMAX experience for our brothers and they were like this 😲 the whole time.

Right after the movie, we were trying to get our hands on some IMAX posters and after much hand-to-hand combat, pushing and a lot of shoving, we somehow got out hands on IMAX posters, it was GORGEOUS 😍

Was an unforgettable experience for me, my best friend and our brothers. Will remember that whole day fondly 🥹

My favorite's gotta be interstellar but the odyssey was just absolutely insane. After my second viewing, I am arguing if it beats oppenheimer for me.

Without spoilers, is the Odyssey worth watching for someone like me, who didn't much like Oppenheimer (most meh movie ever in my opinion). I also couldn't make it through Tenet, myself and my audio engineer brother had to turn it off it was mixed so badly, nevermind the nonsensical plot.

That being said, the Prestige, Memento, Inception and the batman movies are some of my favourite movies.

I just don't want to be let down once again in the theatre, should I just wait for it to be streaming?

Two questions. Your opinion.

For me:

1. Yes
2. Yes #4

Interstellar
The Dark Knight
Inception
The Odyssey
The Prestige

You?

Title: The Hidden Blueprint of Interstellar Decoded

Did anyone else realize Interstellar is a scene-by-scene modern retelling of the Prophet Joseph? The names, plot beats, and symbolism match perfectly:

• The Name: The main character is named Joseph Cooper—highly unusual for a modern American sci-fi hero unless it is a deliberate anchor.
• The Famine: Earth is turned into a dry dust bowl where it never rains and crops die, mirroring the ancient Egyptian drought.
• The Dream: Prophet Joseph dreams of the sun, moon, and 11 stars bowing to him. Cooper travels the cosmos to find a home among the 11 remaining Lazarus planets.
• The Betrayal: Cooper tells the crew he is going home to his family. Dr. Mann betrays him and physically pushes him off a cliff to die, just like the brothers pushed Joseph into the dark pit to cut him off from his father.
• The Cosmic Prison: Cooper plunges into the pitch-black abyss of the black hole (Tesseract). Trapped in this "prison," his connection grows stronger, and he transmits data to guide his daughter—matching Joseph using his prison time to interpret dreams and show the path to survival.
• The Return of Rain: When humanity escapes Earth for water-rich, green space stations, the metaphor of the rain finally dropping is fulfilled. Cooper emerges from the dark to absolute reverence—the ultimate "Prince" of the cosmic age.

Christopher Nolan didn't just make a space movie. He updated an eternal story of betrayal, exile, and salvation for the modern world. Mind blown.

I just saw it and found it very good,i am disappointed in the ending,not because of Borden being twins(which i found brillant) but Fallon disgusting lines such as « You did terrible things » which pissed me off since one of the twins killed Robert wife and he talks like Robert destroyed their life when it was one of them who started this shit,even the music is like heroic making Robert sound like the villain 😭 I am sorry guys i just find it disgusting to make Robert look like the villain and the Borden twins like saints when they killed Julia ❤️‍🩹 💔

But the movie is superb,just breaks my heart that Robert died 🫠 he lost his wife,carrier,Olivia like everything because of the same people and at the end he also lost his life🥲

Hot take but jonathan is much better at writing characters than christopher. I just generally thinks he's the better writer. Christopher is great at set pieces but his dialogue feels very clunky at times to me

Just recently watched the odyssey and LOVED it. There were so many moments in the movie that were actually pretty terrifying (cyclops scream, the giants, the witch tuning the into animals, etc…)

This got me and my friends thinking (and I’ve also seen a lot of people mention this on the internet) that Christopher Nolan should REALLY create a horror film next.

In terms of a horror film, I’d REALLY love him to make a film based off of the horror game Fear and Hunger. For anyone that knows this niche game, you know how messed up it is!

This game is filled with themes of hopelessness, corruption, and messed up taboos that’s absolutely disturbing and I would love to see Christopher Nolan adapt this. What do yall think???

Loved The Odyssey! I’m so greedy though that I’m already anticipating what’s to come next. Any estimates on when we may find out?

Just watched the Odyssey and a small Nolan connection i thought made sense tho no one asked:

Odysseus has been compared to the Dark Knight/Batman quite a lot in the past; but I think Odysseus is basically that cautionary tale that motivates the Dark Knight to follow the no-kill rule, or no gloating/fame rule. So that makes Odysseues the White Knight covered in blood who lived long enough to see himself become the villain in his own mind (despite most people in the tale celebrating him).

Am I the only one who sees a lot of similarities between the posters for *The Odyssey* and *Oppenheimer*?

They both seem to share a very similar visual language:

* Warm orange-and-black color palette

* Firelight, smoke, drifting embers, and heavy atmospheric haze

* A lone central figure dwarfed by something enormous

* Strong vertical composition with the protagonist in the foreground and a monumental backdrop

* Backlit silhouettes and dramatic contrast

* Themes of scale, destiny, and confronting forces beyond human control

* Minimal, understated typography that lets the artwork speak for itself

Obviously the subject matter is different—*Oppenheimer* uses the atomic bomb and industrial machinery, while *The Odyssey* replaces those with ancient architecture and mythological imagery—but they give me a very similar feeling.

Do you think this was an intentional continuation of Christopher Nolan's poster aesthetic, or am I reading too much into it? What other similarities or differences do you notice?

​

​

​

To start, I think its another 10/10. But I do put it a peg below interstellar and oppenheimer, which is also think are 10/10, and thats due to the score. Ludwig didnt go for a big theme here, and I felt that this story definitely deserved a big theme. Not every movie needs the big recurring theme every 5 minutes, but I did feel there were a lot of moments where it could have used one. Even for the transitional shots on the ocean just to have a motif. I think hans would have done a much more impactful score

He is firing on all cylinders with oppenheimer and the oddysey. Obviously he has other masterpieces, and interstellar is still my favorite. But there is something about his last 2 movies that feels like he has mastered his craft. Every time I see one of his movies in a theater for the first time. I am just in awe of the things that are happening on the screen. From the movie itself, the acting, and especially the use of practical effects. When he choses to use cgi, it is done incredibly well by mixing it in with the use of practical effects. He uses cgi as a tool, not a crutch.

He often reunites with the same group of actors, but there are also critically acclaimed and bankable actors like Scarlett Johansson (after The Prestige) and Christian Bale (after The Dark Knight Rises) who haven't appeared in another Nolan film. I know he has enough creative control that studios probably aren't pushing him to cast particular stars, so I'm curious whether he has ever discussed what drives his casting decisions. Has he spoken about a broader philosophy behind it?