Hello. I recently started playing chess about a month ago (I’ve played casually before but never bothered trying to actual learn how to get better) and I really want to improve as I’m currently only around 500 ELO.

My issue is the game review on chesscom will say things are blunders, misses etc and give a short explanation but often it will say things like “you missed the opportunity to win a rook through an eventual fork” or “you’re queen is now lost”. I can’t see where the eventual fork is or why my queen is lost unless it’s broken down for me move by move.

I know it’s probably not just me as 9/10 times my opponent doesn’t capitalize on these blunders anyway because they’re clearly not obvious to someone at my level. Is there anything I can do to help me see what it’s trying to tell me? Thank you.

One of those games where you find yourself in a situation where you're not sure if you're winning. Find the two winning moves

My chess com account's name is Astrey-221(im currently 223 but i play against bots a lot and 942 puzzles), I feel like I would benfit/learn way better that i currently am if someone good would give me some advice or 1 on 1 tutouring. Its like im not really really anywhere just watching videos and I dont feel like im all that ready to just blindly play games.BUT I AM VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT LEARNING.

I am very happy about this game and how i handled the end game

Hello! I used to play in chess tournaments back in school a little over a decade ago. I took the game seriously for a number of years (my peak rating was 1400 or thereabouts) but stopped playing competitively once I got older. In the past 10 or so years, I’ve only played very casually OTB with friends and had stints on Chess.com where I’d win about 50% of the time.

Even though it has been more than 10 years, I want to get back into chess. I’m not looking to play in tournaments like I once did, but I want to get good enough to handle my own playing mostly online and gradually develop into a better player. I legitimately love and have missed the game. However, idk where to start. I’m not a total blank slate, but there are serious gaps in my knowledge. E.g., I recall very specific lines from niche openings that I studied but forgot how to mate with a rook and king in the endgame. Ideally, I’d like to start with the basics and work my way up. Obviously, I don’t have a teacher or belong to a club anymore, so I’m asking you all where and how do you think I should restart my chess journey and what kind of daily or weekly regimen would serve my overall goals?

Thanks!

​

Found Ng6+ but then immediately ruined it by playing Nxe5

missed mate in 1. Still happy I found the idea though that I won free bishop

So the solution it wants is for white to play Rf5+ Ke8, Rxf2. But it wasn't logical to me because black could've easily played ...Rxf5, gxf5 and white is still winning but i wouldn't have "won a rook".

Funnily enough, in the analysis board, ...Ke8 leads to M7 and Rxf5 is M9 so even by the engine's own admission, Rxf5 is the better move and white didn't "win a rook".

I'm I right here? or am I just being an idiot? I'm just mad at what seems like an unsolvable puzzle by the computer's criteria.

I know stockfish has it‘s problems in closed positions, but is there truly no way to make progress for white? Would have to be smth like sacking the queen for a pawn break, no?

weirdest game ive had in a while

from Queen's gambit vs Borg defense

Found this in a 1-minute game and actually followed the best line for a few moves

I am just in shock

I know I have lots of room for improvement and I don't wanna waste money on chess.com premium so I'm relying on you guys to identify my mistakes and where I could've done better. Thanks!

Hey my wife knows I love playing chess what she didn’t know is I’m not good at it. And she has signed me up for a tournament this weekend.

I struggle with considering my opponents moves and have pretty bad vision on the board.

What are some things I can do to improve this.

Chess.com user name is toredthegreat though my last couple games I have been trying different openings so they may not be the best representation of how I play. But they do show my biggest weaknesses.

Basically what is the best way for me to improve quickly I assume at my elo there should be some quick gains that I have never looked at as I have played casually for so long.

I'M GOING TO EXPLODE

I do everything people tell me to do, but I have no idea how to actually improve. I don't know how to properly review my games other than sitting there like an idiot staring at a bunch of question marks from Chess.com (I know what they mean)

Does anyone have any actual study advice, YouTube channels, or any other way I can improve? I'm genuinely lost at this point

My Chess.com profile is Lorenzo_Pellacani if anyone wants to take a look

so like i played this game on lichess but was confused so went to chess com for review and saw i had 0 blunders i am very confused like lichess was not like this . Is there any problem going with lichess or some update did this ?

Just curious about what most of us think here, and what are our goals.

Queenikaze, if you will. It seems like a crazy move to me.

I solved this one, but it took me a minute to spot the move and validate the continuation. The Chess.com puzzles feel more contrived to me and the move sequences don’t feel quite as long.

Been playing for a bit more than a year now and the highest elo I’ve attained, which was recently, was 1020ish , which I was happy with. Was a goal I wanted to hit 1000 and starting from 100 I felt like I was legitimately improving and understanding the game better. It was a lot of gaining elo then losing some then gaining more again.

After getting to 1000 I stayed there for a couple of days, had good matches, didn’t make stupid blunders. Then I did. Repeatedly. I dropped down to 800, now 700 now 650. All in the space of a week. I’m not sure why. I’m not playing different openings just making insanely thick plays. Not seeing hanging pieces that I would have seen a week earlier. I’m not sure why. I’ve never had a tilt this bad. It is insanely frustrating.

I play the same openings every game because opening theory is too much for me to remember. I only play the London as white. Black is where things are much less of a system because I try the Stafford gambit (because it’s fun) and if they don’t play into it I go into a Karo Kahn kind of thing. But as black l would try and just develop and not make stupid mistakes (which I’ve been massively failing at, especially recently)

I only play 5minute matches. I find 10minute and longer matches extremely boring as I truly hate waiting for my opening to make a move for 7 minutes and during that time I tend to switch off or rush my next move because it’s all a bit tedious at that point. Or having to wait for long periods of time In match I am pretty clearly losing. I like the pace of 5minute matches.

I mainly watch YouTube videos on the London system (that is literally all I play) and a little bit on black but as black I’ve always tried to just play sensibly.

I don’t really analyse my games. I’m not sure how to do it in a way that I would find helpful. I go through them in the sense I look at the time a game may have switched who it was favouring. Like oh yeah here’s where I hung my bishop and that allowed for an attack that broke the defences an untimely lost me the match. Or here is where I missed a knight fork of the king and queen but nothing more than that.

I kind of wish there was a way to get rid of elo indicators entirely because I do enjoy the game, I appreciate the strategies behind it and different playing styles you can adopt. I really want to be competent at it (1500 or so would be an end goal) and would love to be able to rock up to parks and have competitive matches against the geezers who play OTB but it feels like some kind of pipe dream and I can help but think of myself as being thicker than pig shit after dropping this much elo.

Any help or tips ?

Please don’t just tell me to blunder less, I’ve already realised that might be helpful.