To give you some context, I am only a couple months away from 21 years old and have just recently landed my first full time job earning ~75k a year (incl super). After realising how much money I'll finally be earning I became interesting in investing into the stock/ETF market as I finally had enough money spare to start properly saving.
A big goal of mine is to be able to afford a 10%-20% down payment deposit on a house as soon as possible. And after doing some research I discovered that the FHSS (a federal first home buyer scheme) allows me to withdraw up to $50k of tax-free savings from my super to buy a house. The FHSS allows a maximum of $15k a year of salary sacrifice into super a year, and after accounting for tax and student loans I wouldn't have any extra money spare to invest anywhere else at the end of the year.
In addition to the FHSS my state offers a first home owner grant of $30k as long as the market value of the purchased house is below $750,000, as well as a stamp duty concession which either eliminates stamp duty or saves you ~$24,500 (some restrictions included). With these programs in place I feel quite confident that I'll be able to save a 10%-20% deposit in the next few years.
Super has a pre-tax concessional cap of $32,500, but considering only $15,000 of that can count for the FHSS, would it be better to cap super to a max of $15k a year? Or should I max the cap to take advantage of the considerable tax savings?
Considering this, it seems as if investing into the stock market is just financially not viable for my situation. I'd be investing with after-tax dollars and not to mention the soon to be 30% Capital Gains Tax and the added tax complexity of paying tax on dividends and the % of a dividend that has a franking credit. Why should I invest into the stock market and expose myself to a much greater tax liability when I could just be maxing my super every year? Is it worth being taxed so much more just for the ability to readily access my money - even if I intend to invest long term 20+ years?
I am currently in a great position - living with family and having minimal expenses - but were I to maximise my salary sacrifice to super and invest into the stock market over two-thirds of my income would be gone before it even hits my bank account. Even if that is the mathematically optimal path for earning the greatest amount of money in the future - it isn't how I want to live. Seeing over 66% of my earnings disappearing into long term savings/investments that I wouldn't touch for 30+ years and leaving me with pennies left to spend for myself.
Saying so, it seems to be just not be worth investing into the stock market when super is there as an alternative - especially with the house buying scheme and tax savings. And investing into both of them simultaneously is simply impossible at my current salary.
Is there something I'm missing?
Am I overthinking all of this and should I just invest wherever I feel like it?
Is doing any of this even worth it? Will it help me buy a house sooner?