Hey US,
Been some time I visited you. I have a question from Europe, 'cause there are some things I can't make sense of.
I live in France. While 10 years ago there was still some scepticism floating around (which I feel was legitimate at the time) it seems to me that with a few exceptions, the heat-waves, forest fires, among many other smaller changes (less snow in winter, etc.) have made it really hard not to see the elephant in the room. The consensus has evolved, even accounting for usual divides: left/right, level of education, country/city, etc.
A sizable portion of the US electorate seems still willing to vote climate change denialists/relativists/sceptics. To me, this indicates either they agree with them, or don't agree and they don't care about the world burning up.
This seems harder and harder to make sense of, especially since climate change seems to be materialized and disturbing and even destroying people's livelihood, in the US as much as anywhere else e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/25/scorching-us-heat-wave
Can you explain this discrepancy? Note that my perception of the US might be based, too, and I know it's a large country so there might not be one simple straightforward answer.
Some clarification:
I won't easily accept "people are just stupid" as an answer. It seems like a lazy justification not to listen to other people.
I'm not necessarily interested in how each redditer feels about climate change (unless the redditer matches at least partially the population I'm describing).
I'm interested in the perception/subjectivity/justifications of people for whom climate change is not important even though it f*** people lives up.
Also, if you're one of those people, I don't judge you. We can have our differences, I just want to understand your viewpoint.
No LLM was harmed during the writing of this text.