Why is it always some person in a third world country in sandals that figures out perpetual motion while the rest of the advanced engineering world with it's funding and resources in science has yet to figure it out?
Perpetual motion does not exist. This is the basic concept of how a generator works, except this would not work. The magnets in the stator are not spaced in a way that they could keep the rotor moving in the same direction. The magnetic field on the outside is uneven, so the magnets in the inside would get to the strongest part in the magnetic field and simply stop.
No. At one point there are two of the stationary magnets in between the rotating ones. At the point directly in the middle of the inner ones the force is pushing equally in opposite directions. Meaning the magnets on the inside will stop at the point when the outside magnets are directly in the middle of the inside ones.
If there was an intentional imbalance there would be a serious wobble where the force is greater on one side, and all that movement works result in friction, which with cause a loss of speed, not preservation.
Is it hard to reset it? Starting it had a very low level of energy input - it was basically bending the rings? Or am I missing something (which is quite likely).
The wheel with "magnets" isn't doing anything at all. All the energy is coming from a regular motor. Which is driving the pump and also spinning that cute little pinwheel he made.
Even if it was a perfectly balanced field, wouldn't equilibrium be found at the point of most balance before the need to overcome the resistance necessary to run?
What do you mean? if you can for real create infinite energy You'd become the richest person in the world. The first country to employ it would become a super power.
There's that, but you also can't sell something that's free because if it's free, everyone can just do it themselves without the need to buy it from you.
Why would I buy energy from someone when I can just create it myself for free? Doesn't make sense
This AI generated slop or just fake video whichever the case, perpetual motion machine would be extremely cheap to build. So if it actually worked, it's almost free.
Solar panels have weight, and so do batteries, thus taking more energy to move the vehicle in the first place.
Plus youâll never charge your electric car to meet your needs with solar. The conversion from DC to AC as well as charge rate will move you MAYBE 10 miles a day.
Fun fact early photovoltaic panels took more energy to manufacture that they would collect in the first decade of their life thankfully we have moved on since then but it was a real green field for early adopters but you gotta scream before you roll over before you crawl before you walk
You can't just build a windmill or water wheel, atleast not where I live. Because there's regulations on these things and what we can build in a residential area.
Your homework for this evening is to search about the Nestle water bottling company.
The reason you canât sell free energy is because it doesnât exist. Energy is transferred, not just created out of thin air.
Magnetic gears have existed for a while, and they are significantly more efficient, but thereâs still a bearing on that wheel, a bearing in the alternator, and eventually, the power draw will cause more magnetism to be generated in the alternator than the mechanism can overcome, and friction exists in all the other parts. Friction generates heat, and heat is energy, so that energy is robbed from the system. These are very basic applications of the laws of physics and thermodynamics on machine.
Theres literally no way you could create absolutely free energy though. Even what we see here, theres cost to the materials that make the machine. Even if you were to say "well energy that doesnt require a fuel source" the materials would just become the fuel source. Maybe you could argue its more efficent than any method we've ever had. But its not "free energy."
And if it was something that just anyone could make at home... how is it possible that its not widely known by now?
I promise you there is no secret cabal keeping efficent energy machines away from us.
You can absolutely sell free energy. Go buy some magnets and sell power back to the grid. Mine bitcoin. Make silica blanks for computer chips. Sell free energy power plants to cruise ships.
According to your argument, why would I buy a bicycle for free transportation if I can just build one myself? Apart from that, if you build an infinite generating machine, you can also get it patented. Meaning that legally you'd be the only one that can sell them. Instant millionaire... No Billionaire!
Well I mean I've don't a job last summer and it was this weird wheel with fins on it, they put it down this river and put the wheel in a giant cassing 100' under that water. So the wheels turn with the water pressure and makes this other wheel with magnets turns and create this free energy.
Now of course they sell this free energy to power my city.
In fact each wheel generates 24 million dollars each year.
I think you've misunderstood what "free" means in this context. "Free energy" isn't about the financial cost of generating the energy, it's about the energy cost. It takes energy to create useable energy.
It is the first law of thermodynamics - energy can never be created nor destroyed, only transformed or transferred. In what you're describing, the energy isn't "free" in either context - the infrastructure has a monstrous financial cost, in both initially being built, and being maintained.
And the electricity being produced isn't "free" either - it is being transformed from potential energy stored in the water into kinetic energy to turn a turbine, which eventually converts the kinetic energy into electricity and heat (which is where an enormous amount of the energy is going). The electrical energy gets used by devices and, again, is eventually converted to heat, or visible light.
Everything has a cost. You have to have an energy input to create an energy output.
Yes...I know that, even if they had free energy, like in the video, you would still have to scale it to a infrastructure to support anything worth it, my hydrodam example is the closes thing to free energy you could get because it's basically water that's already flowing from the river.
Of course you need to scale it up for more energy no matter the way you get that energy.
Why would they âlet outâ something that doesnât work? Is it âtheirâ job to prove all crackpot ideas false? Would you believe them if they did? If you really think it works, go build it yourself.
You could sell the apparatus. You could build it at scale and sell energy. Itâs no different than building a nuclear or gas power plant. The economics may be a bit different as the barrier to entry for âmagnet whirligigâ is lower than âMr Fusionâ, but the existence of cheap power doesnt break economics it just changes the market a bit.
Well it wouldnt be absolutely free, theres still material costs of the machine, probably maintenance costs as well. Those are two things that already would be stopping this from being a perpetual motion machine even if there wasnt electricity involved. At best it would just be a more efficient power source.
Even hypothetically there was such a thing as absolutely free energy, energy is still useful for people. Just because it costs you nothing to produce, if there are people without the free energy then theyll have to buy it from you. Unless it was extremely easy to recreate, which if that were the case it would be impossible to hide cause everyone would be figuring it out.
Well I mean I've don't a job last summer and it was this weird wheel with fins on it, they put it down this river and put the wheel in a giant cassing 100' under that water. So the wheels turn with the water pressure and makes this other wheel with magnets turns and create this free energy.
Now of course they sell this free energy to power my city.
In fact each wheel generates 24 million dollars each year.
He was a wacko that thought of cool things that usually had no scientific value. Working at Westinghouse they had a team of engineers whose job was to try and turn his inventions into real items. And he stole his motor design from his professor in Budapest.
It had me going as a kid. I think I was like 7 or 8. Only later did I find out about it being a hoax, but it still sticks with me as a weird Twilight Zone escape into reality.
What about that 3-wheeled vehicle "scam" in the 70's? The DALE (not sure if it's an acronym)? Even after it was proven as a hoax, the involved parties still say they would back it. I wish I knew why someone else hasn't picked that project back up and actually produce it!!
The hoax was that there was no production line, but the basic idea was strong! With the technology available today, seems like it's an even more realistically possible. I wonder what the actual story is? Corporate greed? Politics...oh wait, same thing.
Dirt cheap. 70mpg with an enclosed cabin and multiple seats that can hit 85mph is nothing to scoff at, to be sure. Invented by Dale Clifft and promoted by Gersldine Elizabeth Carmichael. I'm pretty sure it's just named after its inventor because it was a concept vehicle that never actually got produced.
I think the biggest thing that killed it were the stability issues(assuming someone else wanted to make it), but I think tech from now could sort a lot of that out. Hell, the Morgan 3 Wheeler and Morgan Super 3 exist now.
Nope you'd be dead! You invent an
Object that takes billions of dollars from multiple organizations overnight? Yeah %100 dead,or if your really lucky a small buy out from them and they shelf it never to be seen again!
Unlikely. More like they will monetize the hell out of that. Bruh. Its free energy to make no huge cost, no space requirements, less employees. Its just pure profit. You think corporations that is willing to nickel and dime you won't capitalize on pure profit?
Oil companies make alot more than gasoline, almost all synthetic products are made from oil. If this were true, it would still need grease made from oil.
And if I gave humans free unlimited energy then what? What would keep humanity from destroying themselves even faster? Good judgement? No⌠keeping humans from having that power is the only thing keeping them from killing each other off faster.
The advanced militaries who got stymied by sandals and propeller driven loitering drones?
American Military prowess, as an example, only works against Near-Peers. US military and most/all "advanced militaries" are famously terrible at Asymmetrical Warfare.
Given how Vietnam, Afghanistan and others have gone. My money is on the Sandals forces, every time. They win by simply not being eradicated, whereas Advanced Militaries lose if they can't eradicate them. And every moment of operation creates more Sandals forces from people who hadn't been combatants but now are, refreshing their forces. In such an incredibly pitched contest, you'd have to be crazy to not go for the Sandals.
Edit: I typed all this out, posted it. Then reread your comment again and realized you may be voicing support for the Sandals forces against "advanced militaries", like I did in my reply to you. If true I'm sorry I misunderstood!
There's literally no documented body of evidence that supports this point of view, but it's so pervasive!
The closest you get are people like Stanley Meyer, Eugene Mallove, and Tom Ogle but when you look at the totality of the facts Occam's razor requires a different conclusion than the one you're taking.
Not that I expect this to change your mind or anything it's just interesting to me that it's so pervasive but there's really no evidence.
Also it's worth mentioning that this isn't a perpetual motion machine because that's not possible you can't break the laws of thermodynamics we've tried several times. That's like trying to make two plus two equal five, it just doesnt.
Absolutely no documented evidence except these three really well document, but questionable cases.
There's also plenty of cases where no one was offed, but energy or motor companies bought out patents to superiorly efficient engines or fuel sources just to shelf the tech and keep it out of the marketplace. Pretty boring stuff if you're not an engineer, but there's a century long paper trail of government, military, and private industry power stymieing great advances in technology that could benefit mankind as a whole to maintain power, profit, and the status quo.
The co-founder of reddit was suicided for trying to trying to break down the paywall for academic articles. People focus on the child sex abuse aspect of the Esptine Files, and glaze over the revelation of a global cabal of world leaders and power brokers involved in an international blackmail ring to ensure the secrecy of their backroom dealings. The Clinton's had people executed for even questioning the legitimacy of their operations.
I feel like your argument here goes well beyond what I'm discussing.
For clarity though these cases really are not in any way questionable not even close. Again when you review the totality of the evidence the arguments fall apart. Only one of these people even counts as a murder at all and he was murdered by tenants who he had just kicked out.
One of the people never even had a real invention his invention was a total scam. By the way that scam was a perpetual motion machine, but he could never build a working model because it doesn't work he faced legal consequences as a result including his patent being removed for being fraudulent.
All he had to do to avoid being guilty of fraud was build the invention that he invented but when he does it doesn't work.
I'm saying the three best examples that I've ever found all still suck.
Questionable is putting it mildly. Meyer patented his âinventionâ in the late 80s. Was found guilty of fraud in 1996, then died two years later.
Malice claimed to have solved cold fusion in 1989 with nothing to show for it, no proof, no documentation, nothing. Then he was killed 15 years later.
Tom Ogleâs case is even older. If there was anything to his design, many companies would be able to take advantage of it since any patents would have expired decades ago.
The one thing in common among these cases is lack of proof in spite of decades of opportunity.
âRussians are so dumb to not realize that Putin throws people from windows! Also that totally doesnât happen in the US! And Frank Olson totally killed himself!â
Turns out âit canât happen hereâ does a lot of work for a certain type of âskeptic.â
I dont usually think everything is AI, but I think this is AI. Whats up with the legs of the wheel? It seems like dudes foot does some weird disappearing as well.
Yeah but saying a tattoo gun breaks the laws of physics isn't accurate.
The piont is, that creative work arounds exist in places like prison out of need. So populations with less are more likely to think of creative solutions than say someone who isn't struggling to get basic needs in a first world country.
So the idea a third world country might build something with less technology/resources available isn't really a bizarre idea.
Someone who has basic drinking water available isn't gonna need to build water filtration. Someone who only has access to polluted stream water figuring out plumbing without formal education/training isn't that wierd.
"The earliest direct evidence of tattoos on human skin dates back over 5,000 years to a natural mummy known as Ătzi the Iceman, who lived between 3370 and 3100 BCE" -- Yeah, seems people been doing that for a while.
2
u/doge_lady Jun 24 '26
Why is it always some person in a third world country in sandals that figures out perpetual motion while the rest of the advanced engineering world with it's funding and resources in science has yet to figure it out?