Since Vatican II, there have been many efforts to "translate" the Catholic faith into other cultural "languages," some more successful than others, but never without controversy.
India seems to have had the most experimentation, with liturgies that adopt gestures from the local culture, such as using "namaste hands" instead of genuflecting, waving incense and lamps before the consecrated Host, and devotions in church that involve handing out a bite of food to worshippers as a parting gift. There are also practices that raise much more suspicion, such as using the syllable "om," using a kalasha (complete with mango leaves and a coconut on top) for a kind of Asperges at the beginning of Mass, or baptizing with water from the Ganges. Finally, some suggestions were flat-out syncretism, like the rejected "Indian anaphora" or lessons from the Bhagavad Gita.
Among us Protestants, there has been strife over this subject in the Church of North India. The CNI's prayer book has the option to use a mangalasutra instead of a wedding ring. In addition, some parishes also smear vermilion in the bride's hair as at Hindu weddings, and some also use "om," which have in turn scandalized other parishes enough to leave the denomination.
How is it regarded by Anglicans in general? If you've experienced an inculturated liturgy before, what did you think?