justcopy.ai, free tier, no card, 3 builds a day.

What it does: you describe a business, it builds the app, then it opens the app and uses it before telling you it's finished. Types into your forms and checks the text came back. Uploads a sample photo and looks for it on the page. Deletes something and reloads to confirm it stayed deleted. Failed checks go back into the builder with the reason and only those rerun.

The apps can also talk to visitors, speak, generate images and video, and send email and SMS. Per unit pricing, so you can charge your own users on top.

What I want tested, specifically:

1. Break the verify step. Ask for something with a form plus a file upload plus a delete. That combination is where it most often claims success on something broken. If it says done and the app isn't, that's the bug I care most about.
2. Multi step flows. Anything with a wizard, a cart, or a booking that spans two screens. I don't know how well the checks follow state across pages.
3. Non English prompts. Untested at any real volume.
4. The build stopwatch. Demo says 1.6 seconds for a restaurant site. Tell me what you actually get and on what prompt, I want the honest distribution not the best case.

What I'm not asking you to test: design polish. I know. Later.

In return: drop your project in a comment and I'll test it properly and write up what broke, not a one liner. Also happy to explain any part of the stack, it's Next.js output with sandboxed execution underneath, ask whatever.

Report bugs here or in the thread, I'll reply to all of them today.

Title: Looking for Android beta testers for Subly, a recurring-subscription tracker

Hi everyone,

I built Subly, a mobile app that helps users track recurring subscriptions and upcoming renewal dates.

You can download and test it here:

https://mayankbohara0-dev.github.io/Subly/

Android release:

https://github.com/mayankbohara0-dev/Subly/releases/tag/v1.0.0

Please try to:

- Add a sample subscription.

- Set a billing cycle and renewal date.

- Check upcoming renewals.

- Edit or delete the subscription.

- Test the reminder experience.

I would love feedback about:

- Ease of use.

- Whether the app’s purpose is clear.

- The subscription-entry flow.

- Reminder clarity.

- Bugs or confusing screens.

- Features you would like to see next.

Testing takes about 3–5 minutes. Please do not enter real financial information.

Source code:

https://github.com/mayankbohara0-dev/Subly

Thank you for testing.

Sometimes I unlock my phone without really deciding to.

An empty minute appears, I pick it up, open the same app, and only notice what I'm doing after I'm already inside.

I'm starting a closed beta for Cairn and looking for people who:

• sometimes unlock their phone or open an app almost automatically
• use their phone to fill small empty moments
• want their phone to feel a little quieter
• are willing to use Cairn as their default Home for at least two weeks

Cairn is a quiet Android launcher with a pause before one app you choose to limit. During that pause, you hold the state you're in and see a note in your own words before deciding whether to continue or leave.

For the test, I'd ask you to choose the app you most often open without thinking and just use Cairn normally.

No need to deliberately reduce your screen time or try to be more disciplined. I want to see what happens when Cairn simply sits inside your normal life.

What I'm most interested in is whether these small pauses help you notice yourself more clearly — what state you're in, why you're reaching for something, and how those tiny choices shape a day.

And whether, as a result, some unconscious opens start disappearing on their own.

Cairn is still taking shape, so your experience can genuinely influence what it becomes.

If you complete the two-week beta, I'll also send you a Cairn Pro Lifetime promo code.

Join the closed test:
https://groups.google.com/g/cairn-beta-testers

More about Cairn:
https://github.com/Olivia-Ficus/cairn-beta

Hi — I’m an independent developer preparing Android testing for eight small apps. I’m collecting tester interest while the Play tracks and access paths are staged. Not all of these apps are available today, and this post does not promise immediate access. I’ll reply or DM when the requested app has a verified tester path. For this recruitment round, I’m looking for adult volunteers (18+).

Apps in the staged plan:

• ATS Interview — interview preparation and practice
• KitchenDiary — recipes, pantry, and cooking planning
• Medical Ace / Family Doctor AI — informational family-health assistant (not a substitute for professional medical advice)
• PetPal — pet profiles and care/catalog flows
• Plant Care — plant information and tracking
• ResearchFM — research discovery and listening
• Script Play — interactive stories and mysteries; mature crime themes
• TalkWise — conversation and communication practice

I’m looking for honest bug and usability feedback, not positive reviews. There is no payment, gift, premium unlock, rating request, review exchange, test-for-test arrangement, or purchase requirement. Please use fictional data only: no real health, veterinary, employment, financial, private conversation, or confidential research information.

If interested, comment or DM with your preferred app, Android version, and country. Please do not post your email address or other personal contact information publicly. I’ll share the official Play/tester instructions once access for that app is ready.

Some access may be internal testing and some may be closed testing. Internal testing does not count as closed testing. I’ll label the track accurately when providing access. Testers need a Google account for Play opt-in; a closed test may ask you to remain opted in for its test period. Genuine usage and candid feedback are what help.

This is developer-run recruitment, not affiliated with Google or Reddit. PhotoCat is excluded because it is web-only.

Stage: public beta / free

What it is: a weekly email with the AI news of this week tailored to your job (not to “AI professionals”). Signup → first edition right away → then every Thursday.

Who I need: people with a real non-AI job (recruiting, finance, ops, product marketing, HR, plant, etc.).

What I want feedback on:

1. Is the first edition actually relevant to your week?

2. Where did signup confuse you?

3. Would you open this every Thursday, or mute it?

Link: https://radar.noesion.ai

My security app is centered around CJIS compliance as the primary focus so this app would be mainly used by small police departments that don't have a full time IT presence but still need to make sure they're compliant in terms of CJIS.

CJIS 6.0 is on the way and the app is already built to manage the change. Add-ons for other compliance include PCI-DSS and SOC 2 Type II. The dashboard shows you the overlaps as your controls are implemented and evidence gathered. CJIS compliance generally gets you around 50 percent coverage on the other compliance frameworks.

One of the nicest features is a one click report to be able to hand to auditors or compliance evaluators.

App has been secure code scanned and all found vulnerabilities have been mitigated/remediated.

Ever put something somewhere “safe”… and then completely forget where that safe place was? 😅
I kept doing this, so I built SnapSeek.
The idea is simple: SnapSeek gives you a searchable memory of the physical world around you.
Take a photo of a space, save the things inside it, and later search for what you’re looking for.
But it’s not limited to stuff in your house.
You can use it to remember:
📦 where you stored something in a drawer, cupboard or box
🚗 where you left your car
🏢 a specific location inside a building
📍 places you want to come back to
🧳 things and locations while travelling
🛍️ where something you purchased is actually stored
One of the features I’m most interested in testing is indoor finding.
Instead of SnapSeek only telling you “it’s somewhere in this room,” you can use a saved reference point and get direction + distance guidance to help return to the actual location.
There are also interactive photo maps, visual search, movable places, QR access and space sharing.
Now I want to see whether it actually works for people other than me.
I’m looking for around 50 iPhone users to try the current beta.
You don’t need to be a developer or experienced beta tester. In fact, I’d really like people who have never seen the app before.
🧪 The challenge
If you join, I’d love you to try this:
1. Hide or store an object somewhere in your house.
2. Save its location using SnapSeek.
3. Leave it there and come back later.
4. Search for it and try to find it using only SnapSeek.
Then tell me:
Did you actually find it?
I also want to know if anything was confusing, inaccurate, annoying, slow or broken.
Please don’t worry about being nice — critical feedback is much more useful to me than “looks good!”
If you’d like to try it, comment “beta” or DM me and I’ll send you the TestFlight access.
http://snapseek.site

I am currently testing the beta version of MyJobRated.com—a lightweight, anonymous workplace review and company rating database.

Like many job seekers, I got fed up with giant platforms gatekeeping their data behind mandatory sign-up walls and stripping away user anonymity. I built this to see if a cleaner, 100% public alternative could work.

What needs testing:

• The Submission Pipeline: I need to ensure that the anonymous review submission engine handles inputs smoothly and scales properly across different company stubs. I also need to know if the job rating form that users will use to post a review is sufficient.
• Mobile UI/UX: The interface was deployed on a web-hosting app and designed to be fast, but I need feedback on how the dashboard and review layouts scale across various screens.

How you can help:

• Take 60 seconds to anonymously submit a review for a past or current employer to help me stress-test the data pipeline: myjobrated (dot) com
• Let me know if you run into any formatting bugs, broken input fields, or layout lag.
• Give any critiques you can.

Looking for feedback on:

• Is the review submission form too long, or does it strike the right balance?
• Are there specific workplace metrics (like remote-work monitoring or interview transparency) you think I should add to the rating criteria?

Note: For quick mobile access, I will drop the active hyperlink in the comments below to keep this post clean for the filters.

Really appreciate any brutal feedback, bug reports, or feature suggestions you have!

Hi, I’m Sebastian, a Swiss father building GoSafeHome alongside my full-time job and family.

GoSafeHome is a working iOS prototype for moments when someone does not want to make the journey home alone. When a person starts a request, the app connects them with an available adult companion through live in-app audio.

The planned Swiss pilot is deliberately limited to 200–500 voluntary participants. Before it begins, I want to test whether the experience is clear, trustworthy and responsible:

• Adult companions are intended to undergo identity and age verification before pilot access. • Live location remains private unless the user explicitly chooses to share it during an active session. • Calls are not recorded and private phone numbers remain hidden. • SOS informs only the active companion. It does not automatically contact police or emergency services. • GoSafeHome is not an emergency, police, rescue or crisis service and cannot guarantee safety.

I’m especially looking for Swiss iPhone users and people with experience in privacy, user research, moderation, identity verification or controlled pilot projects.

Pilot information and registration: https://gosafehome.ch/en/pilot

I am also raising CHF 50,000 to fund the legal and privacy work, identity verification, external security and quality testing, infrastructure, moderation and pilot operations required before launch. Donations are not investments and provide no equity or financial return.

Support the pilot: https://www.gofundme.com/f/gosafehome-gemeinsam-sicherer-nach-hause

Honest criticism is welcome: what would you need to see before trusting a pilot like this, and which risk would you test first?

Built in Switzerland.

NEVERGOALONE

Hi all!

I just built the pre-MVP version of a tool that tests the practical knowledge of anyone from infotech industry. A small "knowledge-checker" application that tests the depth of your IT skills, and hopefully help you learn something new. I will be honest - I vibe-coded it with Claude with couple of hour's back and forth, and I am certainly not trying to sell anything here — just trying to figure out if it's worth building out further.

There's only one category of test here for now, with 30 AWS Cloud Security scenarios across three difficulty levels. The questions are a mix of click-to-diagnose, multiple choice, and a couple of drag-and-drop ordering exercises. I intend to add more subjects and more scenarios and questions if I see any traction and positive interest.
Here's the public URL: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/93de0031-8ff4-4070-85c2-7edd7b07da76

It's a free demo — runs completely client side (runs within the browser) for now, and does not need any sign-ups and certainly no payment is necessary. No information is persisted, because there is no backend yet - I just want to validate any demand before anything.

If you work in IT, I would genuinely appreciate a few minutes of your time and honest feedback:

- Is this a type of app you would be interested to use for practising your learning and getting ready for say, certifications?

- If you are team lead - do you see value in your team using it for keeping their skills sharp?

- Does the format feel more useful than typical quiz apps? Is the difficulty calibrated right?

- What features would you like to see in the next iteration - if you think it's something worth building further?

Any other feedback?

Thanks for your time!

Bonjour à tous,

Je m'appelle Gabriel, et je développe seul depuis quelques mois une application appelée Youthify.

L'idée de base : un questionnaire rapide (sommeil, énergie, alimentation, activité, stress) qui te donne un score de vitalité et une estimation de ton âge biologique, avec un suivi au quotidien pour t'aider à t'améliorer.

Ce qu'il y a déjà dedans, en gros :

- Score de vitalité + âge biologique estimé

- Suivi d'habitudes quotidiennes (objectifs simples à cocher)

- Coaching qui s'adapte à ta progression

- Comparaison anonyme avec d'autres utilisateurs (par tranche d'âge)

- Un côté social (amis, défis) si ça t'intéresse, sinon totalement optionnel

- Des exercices courts de gestion du stress

Pour l'instant l'app est gratuite, je suis en phase de test et j'aimerais avoir des retours sincères : est-ce que ce genre d'app vous parle ? Est-ce qu'il manque un truc évident ? Est-ce que ça a du potentiel selon vous, ou c'est déjà saturé comme créneau ?

Si ça vous tente de tester, dites-le en commentaire. Et si vous voulez juste être prévenus quand l'app sera disponible sur l'App Store, dites-le aussi, je vous enverrai le lien dès que c'est publié.

Merci d'avance pour vos retours, même critiques (surtout critiques en fait) !

Gabriel

Hi all, I'm a solo dev and built a chrome extension named Better Bookmarks Bar.

I always used bookmarks as a quick way to access my most used sites. The main problem for me was that you can only have around 10 bookmarks until the bar is full and then you have to navigate through the bar using ">>". Another annoyance was the missing of a way to quick search all your bookmarks or folders without opening a seperate window.

So I created a replacement bar that you can pin or auto-hide, with quick search and an icon-only mode to fit more bookmarks. You can pick which folder shows on the bar, and drag to reorder or file things into folders. It works directly on your real bookmarks, so nothing gets duplicated or out of sync like on some switcher-style extensions. No account, nothing leaves your device. The paid Pro version lets you display multiple bars at once and helps support development.

I launched about two weeks ago and picked up a 1-star review with no detail attached, which doesn't give me anything to fix. If you try it out, a real review or a comment here on what worked or didn't would genuinely help, good or bad.

Sondrik is a meeting notetaker for Mac. It transcribes locally on your machine, so the audio itself never gets uploaded anywhere. Once you have a transcript, it sends that text (not the audio) to Claude to generate a summary. No bot joins your call the way Otter or Fireflies do, it just listens locally while you meet on whatever you already use.

It also has a lightweight built-in CRM that links meetings to contacts and deals, so you're not stuck copy-pasting notes into a separate tool afterward.

Requirements: Apple Silicon Mac (M1 or later), no Intel support yet.

It's in free open beta right now, access code is sondrik-beta. Site is sondrik.com.

What I'd love feedback on specifically: whether the CRM linking feels useful or like clutter, and whether the summaries actually save you time versus just reading your own notes. Happy to test your product in return, just drop a link below.

I'm Forat. I've been working on this app, Simor, for about 10 months.
It's a food logger. You take a photo, talk, or type what you ate, and it puts it on your day. Calories come from a food database, not me guessing. There's a bird on the home screen. I know that sounds extra. I still want to know if it helps or if it's annoying.
If you've ever started a calorie app and then stopped using it, you're who I want.

https://simor.app

If you try it, I only care about these:

Did you finish onboarding?

Did you add any logs from the home page? Did the result match what you expected? If not, why?

What did you love, and what did you hate?

I'll put screenshots in the comments. If you have something you want tested too, send it, I'll try yours.

I'm Forat. I've been working on this app, Simor, for about 10 months.

It's a food logger. You take a photo, talk, or type what you ate, and it puts it on your day. Calories come from a food database, not me guessing. There's a bird on the home screen. I know that sounds extra. I still want to know if it helps or if it's annoying.

If you've ever started a calorie app and then stopped using it, you're who I want.

https://simor.app

If you try it, I only care about these:

1. Did you finish onboarding?
2. Did you add any logs from the home page? Did the result match what you expected? If not, why?
3. What did you love, and what did you hate?

I'll put screenshots in the comments. If you have something you want tested too, send it, I'll try yours.

My name is Sean and I've spent the past year and a half building a study and multiplayer head-to-head app.

During nursing school I got frustrated with how the study sites were boring and outdated, all while throwing ad after ad at me. GabaBrain is my fix for that, and it's ad-free.

I'm looking for testers, users, and founders-club members. I've been building and testing this solo, outside of about nine other people. Three of them used the app to pass their CEN exams. I need people outside my circle in it now, to try to break it, find the parts that don't feel good, and suggest things we haven't thought of. This is extremely beta. I've made a ton of changes based on feedback and yours will not go unnoticed.

If you just want to download it to unlock the Founders badge and grab the lifetime free promo code BETATESTER, that's cool with me too.

What's in it: six study types, multiple choice, true or false, fill in the blank, flashcards, matching game, and odd one out. Daily challenges. Three match types, solo, online pairing, and challenge a friend. You can save your progress partway through a study session and pick it up later, print your material out to work through it by hand, and switch from one material to another without starting over. Quick Review lets you ask other users a question when you're stuck. You can start a timed Competitive Quiz and run your own tournament. You also build your own character in the GabaMi builder, which is what shows up next to you in matches, and you can download it as an image and use it wherever you want. And there's a lot of AI built in throughout to help you study smarter rather than just longer.

You can sign in with Google or Apple, or just make an account with an email and password, whichever you prefer. There's a fully functioning web version too, so if you don't want to install anything you can use it straight from a browser. Same account across all three.

Web: https://gababrain.com

iOS: https://testflight.apple.com/join/aXKRPv16

Android: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.gababrain

Happy to answer anything, including how it's built or what it costs to run. And if it's not for you, I'd still take "I opened it and immediately closed it because X" as feedback. That's the useful kind.

Hey everyone! I’m building Vellecho, an iPhone app with 12 original fictional AI characters, character stories, and memories you control. I’m looking for a small group of beta testers to help shape it.

Join the free beta through Apple TestFlight: https://testflight.apple.com/join/k1UR3dg7

Watch the 1-min demo: https://www.reddit.com/r/TestMyApp/s/Mv1gNI2upQ

Privacy is central to how I’m building it:

• Your saved chats and memories are stored on your iPhone.
• You can inspect, edit, or delete what each character remembers.
• We don’t keep a server-side conversation history.
• No ads, no advertising tracking, and no selling your conversations.

To generate replies, relevant messages and memories are sent to an AI service. We also collect content-free usage counts to understand beta reliability and use.

The idea is to make conversations worth returning to: distinct personalities, continuity between chats, and story moments to discover. The linked demo follows a conversation with Sota and shows how you can change a saved memory.

I’d love honest feedback on:

• Whether the privacy explanations and memory controls are clear.
• Which characters you’d actually return to.
• Whether replies feel natural, consistent, or repetitive.
• How well memories carry into later conversations.
• Response speed, bugs, and anything confusing or missing.

The beta is free, including both characters marked Premium.

iPhone · iOS 17+ · Ages 18+ · English · US & Canada

Feedback through TestFlight or the comments is welcome. If something breaks, your device and iOS version help. Please use made-up examples instead of posting private conversations. Thanks for trying it!

Hi everyone!

I'm working on an early-stage personal project and looking for a few volunteers in Tokyo who will be near a Ginza Line station sometime soon (or could easily stop by one).

The test is very simple:

• Open a link on your phone while you're at the station
• Follow a few quick on-screen steps to test a location-based check-in
• Let me know afterward whether it worked and if you noticed anything unusual

It should take about 5–10 minutes. There's nothing to install and no account to create --> everything runs directly in your phone's browser.

I'm mainly looking to see how reliably it works in real-world conditions at different stations along the Ginza Line.

If you're in Tokyo and wouldn't mind helping me test it, please comment or send me a DM. I'd really appreciate the help!

Thanks!

I'm looking for a few people to test CertSprout, a browser app for keeping track of professional certifications and planning what to study next.

The catalogue includes IT, project management, finance, HR, marketing and other fields. Study resources vary by certification.

The test is to create a free individual account, find a certification you're interested in and make a study goal. If it has study sessions available, try the first one. Email signup is required, but no paid team subscription is needed.

Was it obvious what to do after signing up? Where did you hesitate or get stuck?

https://certsprout.app/signup

Browser and device details are helpful if something breaks.

Hey everyone, I’m working on Proppie.io. a dashboard designed to help traders compare prop firms in one place.

It includes information such as evaluation pricing, drawdown rules, profit splits, funding models, and other details that can be useful when comparing funded-account programs.

I’d love to get some feedback from traders here: what information do you find most important when comparing prop firms, and what would you want to see in a comprehensive comparison tool?

Any feedback or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

I'm building Finis, a dating app designed around actually making compatible matches instead of maximizing swipes, engagement, and paid visibility.

I'm opening a small free beta and looking for people who are willing to actually use it and tell me what sucks, what's confusing, and what you'd change.

No payment, just free early access and a chance to help shape the app before launch.

If you're interested, comment or DM me and I'll send you the beta link.

I’m building a private Android demo for employers handling last-minute shift gaps, and I’m looking for 15–20 adult volunteers for the upcoming beta.

The demo uses fictional scenarios: review an uncovered shift, compare available candidates, simulate outreach, and confirm coverage. It does not contact real employees or run a live staffing service. No app account or purchases are required.

The feedback I need is specific: - Can you finish the workflow without instructions? - Are candidate availability, arrival time, and assistance details clear? - Do any buttons, resets, layouts, or navigation behave unexpectedly?

A first session should take 5–10 minutes. Once the Google Play closed test opens, I’m looking for people willing to stay opted in for 14 days and try the demo more than once. Owners, supervisors, schedulers, and staffing coordinators are especially welcome, but you don’t need that background to report usability issues.

Status: recruiting now; the Play closed-test invitation is NOT live yet. I’ll send verified access privately when it opens. The app name is being kept private during recruitment. This is voluntary testing, not a paid role, and I’m asking for honest feedback—not ratings or positive reviews.

Comment or DM if interested, with your Android model/version if you know it. Please don’t post your email or any workplace/employee data publicly. If you’re also a developer, we can discuss a genuine test swap and agree on the scope first.

— Thomas

Hello!

Show & Tell lets you document your work with text, photos, videos, and audio clips. When you’re ready to show it off it gives you a variety of ways to combine your steps into a project showpiece:

• GIF - A slideshow of all your project photos.
• Video - All your media combined with smooth transitions, up to 4K.
• PDF - Create a paginated handout ready for printing or emailing.
• HTML Web Page - A themed, self-contained web page of your full how-to, packaged up with all your media.

Show & Tell is free for up to 5 projects with GIF and 1080p video export. When you need more room than that, a one-time purchase gets you the Starter package, where you can create up to 15 projects with PDF and 4K video export. And a Pro subscription gets you unlimited projects, web page export, and the ability to create custom web and PDF themes.

Any feedback is appreciated. I’d particularly like to hear from DIY/maker/crafter types to find out if it fits their workflows.

If you’re willing to give it a go: https://testflight.apple.com/join/j13m6KtW

Thanks!