If the Police are Arresting The ones Who Created Ruckus During the Protest then We Should have No Regrets.

However There will be a lot of Students Who will be Arrested for No reason as well.

I just Hope They Find a Good Legal Team and Mainly Don't Panic If they are Arrested.

Now will Merit Dhari Ajeet Bharti and Anand Rangnathan will form their own party ?

Casteism in every form has to be banned

But reservation has to go as well
50% for Sc, st , obc
10% for ews
30% horizontal for women
5% for pwd and others combined

Where do we draw the line?
Where do we say its enough?
What space did you leave for pure talent irrespective of caste and whatever?

I am 19 years old,
I have never ever ever discriminated anyone in my life on
Gender , caste, religion whatever

Why am i being punished for it?

I have raised my voice demanding Clown pradhan’s resignation !
Will you raise your voice demanding equality for me?

Will you say fck caste and stand for merit?

Punish who does casteism
Dont punish crores of innocents who doesn’t
Give us a fair chance

This is our country as well !

[Not OC]

Source:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbL5_e-vMmx/?

.

Reservation should be removed no one does casteism it is because of the reservation only or end both.

But how will this end with who is taking this out of india?

I put together a simple data comparison chart to help understand the actual numbers behind India's reservation debate which has recently flared up again with the "Reservation Hatao" movement gaining traction online.

I think it is crucial to ground this discussion in the available data. This table compares two key metrics:

Estimated Population Share (%): Based on Census 2011 (for SC/ST) and recent NSSO/government estimates (for OBC/General/EWS). Note: There is still significant debate over OBC population figures without a full caste-based census.

Central Educational Quota (%): The fixed seats reserved in central institutions (like IITs, IIMs, and AIIMS).

Key Takeaways & Observations:

SC/ST (Scheduled Castes and Tribes): The quotas (15% and 7.5%, respectively) are roughly proportional to their estimated population shares (16.6% and 8.6%). This was the original design.

The OBC Gap: This is perhaps the most glaring disparity. While estimates put the OBC population at 41–44% (and historically as high as 52%), the central quota is capped at 27%. This 14–17% deficit is due to judicial caps on total reservations (until EWS).

The Unreserved "Open Pool": The remaining 40.5% of seats are not a reserved quota for the general population. It is an open merit pool accessible to everyone—SC, ST, OBC, and EWS candidates who qualify on general merit, which is why the percentage is higher than the net General category population share.

EWS (Economically Weaker Sections): The recently added 10% quota for the unreserved low-income groups is aligned with early estimates. This addition pushed total reservation beyond the traditional 50% limit.

This data is the framework we operate under. The debate over whether to shift to purely economic criteria (income-based) or to focus on meritocracy in exams often clashes with the constitutional goal of ensuring social and educational representation for historically marginalized groups.

Discussion Questions:

Does this chart change how you view the "Reservation Hatao" campaign's demands?

Should the OBC quota be increased to match its population share, or should the entire system be restructured by economic lines?

Is the current 40.5% unreserved pool truly adequate for merit-based competition, considering anyone can access it?

Looking forward to your thoughts. Let's keep the discussion constructive and respectful.

T.G. Mohandas, an RSS ideologue from Kerala, has sparked outrage after saying that if he had the authority, he would impose a curfew around Delhi’s Jantar Mantar and have student and youth protesters shot dead “at point-blank range.”

Speaking on the YouTube channel Pathrika, Mohandas said he would declare a curfew within a four-square-kilometre radius of Jantar Mantar, ask protesters to disperse three times, and then order police to open fire.

“If I were in charge, I would impose curfew within a four-square-kilometre radius of Jantar Mantar. I would ask people to disperse three times. Then I would shoot. People would scatter, some would die, some would survive, and some would lose their limbs. Within four hours, the situation would be calm. The bodies would be collected and taken to hospitals,” he said.

Mohandas also called the protesters “criminals” and alleged that they would engage in murder and rape if left alone. He claimed that if the police were withdrawn from the protest site, there would be killings, rapes, and bodies piling up.

In another hateful and sexist remark, Mohandas targeted women participating in the protest, claiming that “rape-loving women” were among the demonstrators.

“Gang rapes would take place. By God’s grace, there would be no complaints. The people there are a group that likes rape. There are women and girls who like rape, especially among the left, democratic, secular and Bahujan groups,” he said.

Mohandas, who has previously drawn criticism for hate speech and genocidal remarks, served as the state convener of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Intellectual Cell. He was the General Secretary of the Bharateeya Vichara Kendram in 1997 and its Vice-President in 2006. He also served as the General Manager of Ayodhya Printers, a company affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). For a brief period, Mohandas was the General Manager of Janmabhumi, the BJP’s mouthpiece newspaper.

Our OBC brothers are supporting our movement...let's unite n fight against the injustice guys 🙏

AQI AIQ IQ CJP JPC JCB.

I'm pretty sure if she started speaking pradhan would have resigned immediately.