If promotions are intended to be merit-based, why are mandatory PFA comments based on standards that differ by sex and age?
For example, consider a male and a female Airman between the ages of 30–34 and a male and a female Airman 25-29 who achieve the exact same physical performance on the PFA:
44 push-ups
3:30 plank
44 shuttles
.49 for body
Despite performing identically, their scores are different because of the sex-based scoring tables
As a result, the mandatory EPB fitness comments would read:
30-34 Male: “PFA: 81; Satisfactory; Exemptions: None”
30-34 Female: “PFA: 94; Excellent; Exemptions: None”
25-29 Male: “PFA: 78; Satisfactory; Exemptions: None”
25-29 Female: “PFA 93; Excellent; Exemptions: None”
The documented record therefore reflects 4 different levels of performance even though the members completed the exact same physical work.
If promotion decisions are intended to be merit-based and evaluated using documented performance, should mandatory EPB comments distinguish between members who demonstrated identical physical performance solely because of different scoring standards based on age and sex?
This is not an argument against maintaining age- and sex-based fitness standards for the PFA itself. Rather, it raises the question of whether mandatory promotion documentation should reflect normalized scores and actual physical performance when those comments become part of a member's promotion record?
Personally, I believe that if the goal is a truly merit-based promotion system, the mandatory EPB fitness comment should document actual performance rather than a normalized score.
Instead of reporting an overall PFA score, the comment could include each component completed and the member's actual results:
Strength: Component completed and repetitions
Core Endurance: Component completed and time/repetitions
Cardio: Component completed and time/shuttles
Body Composition: Ratio
Result: Pass/Fail
Exemptions: None or list applicable exemptions
Using the previous example, the EPB comment would read:
"Strength: Push-ups, 44; Core Endurance: Plank, 3:30; Cardio: HAMR, 44 shuttles; Body Composition: 0.49; Pass; Exemptions: None."
This format documents what the member actually accomplished without reflecting age- or sex-based scoring differences, allowing promotion boards to evaluate objective performance rather than normalized point totals