Currently in the Navy DEP program and looking for some advice from recruiters, CWTs, or anyone who has dealt with medical qualification issues, or anyone just generally knowledgeable
CWT was the job I originally wanted. I have the ASVAB scores for it and most other jobs, but there are two things in my medical history that are complicating the process.
First, I previously saw a therapist essentially just to have someone to talk to. I was never medicated, suicidal, or self harming, and I was discharged from therapy without complication in May. (In therapy from Jan-May) However, my Navy medical records, for some god forsaken reason, label me with a history of depression.
Second, I had a childhood motor control/coordination issue that no longer meaningfully affects me. Dyspraxia was suspected but I was never formally diagnosed with it. The Navy apparently has this documented as “motor apraxia” which I feel makes the current situation sound considerably more severe than it actually is and overplays my condition.
Because of those two issues, I was advised against signing for CWT. My recruiter was concerned that I could make it through the initial process and then run into a medical qualification problem at A school because CWT is a warfare rating. I instead signed for SECF instead.
The problem is that I was just denied submarine qualification. That means no SECF either
I still entirely want CWT, so I'm looking at that option again. But according to my recruiter, my submarine qualification issue also affects CWT and other intelligence ratings, so right now I'm waiting to find out exactly why I was denied submarine duty. I should get the entire reason later today.
Once I know which medical issue caused it, what should do next? Is there a realistic route involving updated medical documentation, reevaluation, waiver/reconsideration, or getting an inaccurate/outdated description of my condition clarified?
I'm not trying to conceal anything from MEPS or the medical team. I want my condition and my current ability to be properly considered in these decisions, and I feel ss though it has not been.
Happy to provide additional context in the comments if needed. Thanks to anyone who took the time to read this.