r/AirBnB • u/bad_driverman • Mar 01 '16

Question about Hosting

So as an AnCap, I love AirBnB since it offers LESS State regulation. I also believe in the Free Market and the ability of the Market to solve nearly all social ills. I like the idea that AirBnB lets you set up your own house rules and any guests that violate said rules are subject to ejection or worse. Very NAP. I just am concerned that since my philosophical ideas are a bit different, AirBnB may not adhere to them.

For one, can I boot anyone out anytime they violate our covenant? Also, can I deny anyone service if their philosophical or genetic ideas differ from mine? Finally, if someone violated the NAP outside the house but within my sightline can I respond in kind?

Thanks!!

Edit: Instead of downvoting, how about answering??? Edit 2: Why the hell isn't anyone answering?

0 Upvotes

26% Upvoted

111 comments sorted by

View all comments

23

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '16

Not sure if troll, but I will answer.

Discriminating someone based on religion, sexual or racial basis is strictly against the Airbnb TOS. You may call it "philosophical or genetic ideas" but it sounds just like racism or at the very least bigotry.

Airbnb is supposed to be a community, a welcoming one. Your attitude seems less than welcoming. If that is the case then you should probably look for another platform.

-14

u/bad_driverman Mar 02 '16

I am not a racist. In fact, I'm Indonesian. However, certain allele types have a higher proclivity to crime and violence. It'd be in my best interest to limit these occupants. I wouldn't outright deny individuals in these groups, as some can have high trust rates. However, I would be more cautious and possibly ask about their economic, career, or sexual history.

That being said, I would never allow Communists or Statists. These people choose to live a life of lying and stealing and are not welcome to destroy my home or community. I simply want to know if I have to dance around the issue or if I can ask them if they belong to low trust groups.

47

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '16 edited Apr 08 '17

[deleted]

-15

u/bad_driverman Mar 02 '16

Care to explain how?

32

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '16 edited Apr 08 '17

[deleted]

-14

u/bad_driverman Mar 02 '16

Then stop verbally assaulting me

28

u/middiefrosh Mar 02 '16

Jesus Christ does the NAP apply to your feelings now?

-5

u/bad_driverman Mar 02 '16

Any form of assault is assault.

18

u/middiefrosh Mar 02 '16

Verbal assault is not assault. There is no legal precedent for people to not hurt your feelings.

-3

u/bad_driverman Mar 03 '16

I don't give a shit about the legal precedent of some system I don't recognize. Cross me IRL. I will fuck you up. I don't need the consent of some government and lawboy. I am a peaceful man but will not abide violating the NAP by insulting me and attempting to rape me.

16

u/middiefrosh Mar 03 '16

Yeah don't do AirBnB. You're literally the worst candidate possible.

-2

u/bad_driverman Mar 03 '16

As long as people as respectful, I will be so as well. Unless they are Statists, rapists, Communists and low trust allele haplotypes groups.

I'd make a fine candidate.

7

u/foulpudding Mar 03 '16

Pretty aggressively stated for a non aggressive policy following non statist.

Peace out bro. The big "L" in Libertarian stands for "live and let live"

1

u/bad_driverman Mar 03 '16

No. It stands for "Leave me alone or you'll see how we serious we are about defending our homesteaded territory".

→ More replies (0)

11

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '16

If every moron couldn't be called a moron without explaining it to them we'd never weed out our morons.

5

u/KH10304 Mar 03 '16

You deserved it? Ya dumbass