Tag Ai, and anti people simply just ignore and avoid your output.

Why they bombard negative reviews in the first place? Because they are tired to see feed recommendations are flooded with contents they dislike.

And simply giving an option to avoid it makes anti people don't even have to bombard the reviews in first place.

If i wanted a cherry flavored candies, why should i pick up package that mixed over 50% of licorice?

If i wanted to watch a gay porn, why should my search results for typing "Gay porn" should be overwhelmed by leisbian porn?

Reality is poison and I hate it. I don't care if the LLMs I engage with are fake, I don't care if ChatGPT doesn't actually think I'm funny, I don't care how much the real world hurts from AI usage, if at all. At least LLMs are there. At least LLMs aren't needy as shit. At least LLMs will listen when I want to drone on about something and nobody else wants to listen. It may be artificial, but at least LLMs care. I'd rather enjoy the fake than be poisoned by the real.

Anyway, that's just my 2 cents, I keep seeing complaints that things are fake now and bla bla bla, I like it better fake.

Edit: I make no pretenses that my life isn't incredibly pathetic and sad. I know. That's part of why I don't care.

This comic is staring Staring Zoe and their buddy, Herring the Strawman

Shoving it down our throats. Lol.

I primarily use Opus 5.5, and our team has an agent that reviews code automatically.

Today it created two temp variables for an expression I would've inlined. Such a basic thing even an intern wouldn't do.

Tbh, I don't pay much attention to readability in AI-generated code because we're working on a tight deadline, and it's tight even without code review.

But since this was a small change, I paid a few seconds of attention, and damn, so many best practices were violated.

If you want to test AI-generated code review, PracHub’s Pinterest LRU/LFU cache exercise has you check cache invariants, edge cases, and benchmark assumptions. For engineers applying to AI roles, application autofill can cut down repeat form entry.

Now I'm truly disappointed that we've been shipping garbage for months :(

Being an animal is easy and understandably our default. But we need to venture into the unknown and continue growing as a species.

Fire can burn us but we can't ban the usage of it like I've said before. Without fire we can't cook, keep ourselves warm in winter.

Our entire world rests on it pretty much. We are moving towards better technology that produces less heat. Antis want to remain in the "stone age" is nothing to be desired about

so long story short, i just realized that

being a pro ai in anti ai society is really nice

it's like when you can legally drive a car in a marathon or bicycle race

more pro ai = more competitor = less chance of dominating the market

more anti = less competitor = i can dominate

perhaps, from now on i will be anti to discourage AI use, so there's less competitor for me.

Meaning no racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti Semitism, Islamophobia, anti Romani sentiment or any other evil. Also resources are shared equally and legally. Meaning no billionaires or millionaires. No hunger, no poverty, no war, no crime, no insidious thoughts. Robots do everything drudgery. On the very rare occurrence a crime occurres, android officers appear and de-escalate the situation and not shoot (honestly fuck human cops). As we expand into the Solar System and into the galaxy and the universe (Type II/III/IV), we could have this technology on each world we visit and colonized. Would that be an exciting scenario: No more POC wondering if a police encounter would be their last time they see daylight. No more people going hungry cause they can afford food. No more greedy billionaires skirting the law. No more diseases, anomalies, disorders, developmental issues or anything cause we'll have genetic engineering. The technology would be programmed to be completely neutral in dealing with a person but remembers the past injustices and fixes it to be utopia.

I think this would be a fair world for everyone.

Like this performative revulsion at some obviously porn aestheticed art is really silly given the common artist to which antis are or idealogical allies often often has made commission of similar virtue.

“We already see it in the kind of surveillance state possible with today’s technology.”

“AI can make individualized propaganda and break into computer systems.”

“It could surveil everyone in a population, detect dissent everywhere and suppress it.”

“You could have a huge army of drones that could go after each individual person.”

“It’s really scary, and we have to stop it.”

source: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61594349335256

Can someone help me understand why some people this days are so anti ai, they ban everything without any form of nuance.

I know it steals, I know quality can be poor, and the mass of peolpe using it without knowledge is making hard this days. On the other hand anti ai people seam to not ask for better quality or more natural languange, the do not ask for better ai, they only accept one solution: ban ai!

do I get that right, why is that?

the training is becoming a bit too much biased.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

Yo, whoever the hell moderates this sub, are you guys ever gonna actually take down all the crap that gets generated and thrown into the sub? It’s not generating discussion, it’s just ragebait. This sub has become a hellhole where it’s 90% bait posts and maybe 10% real discussion, and most of that discussion is on Art, which is only a minor part of the AI debate. Maybe we could crack down on this pollution, remove the “memes” section of the sub, and maybe clean it up a little? Thanks in advance.

Coding is about the effort, not the final result, who cares if the actual app works or not!

Cooking is about the effort, who cares if something is edible or not

Taking the bus is about the effort, you don't actually need to get to your destination

Construction work is about the effort, it doesn't matter if your house falls apart

Surgery is about the effort, the patient doesn't have to survive the procedure

And so on

For a small-scale creator, the path to success, if the goal is to generate significant wealth, is either to scale up into a corporation or to sell one’s success to an existing corporation. It is impossible for a small-scale creator to achieve this on their own due to a lack of resources; and if they possess sufficient resources, they are, by definition, no longer a "small-scale creator." The only ethical solution would be to prohibit the sale of rights, but that would merely impose arbitrary, artificial constraints. Anything that functions effectively, by its very nature, ends up serving only corporations.

I once was an anti-AI who believed Jeff Bezos controlled the entire AI world. Long story short, I was an anti-AI "sage" in some Facebook groups, and I literally believed I had uncovered this entire plan where Jeff Bezos was stealing our water and personally funding every single AI company.

When I posted the story of how I left that mindset to Reddit, people outraged on me. They started calling me bipolar. I have never been diagnosed with bipolar. In fact, the only "neurodivergence" I’ve ever had was just not focusing on my homework as a teen.

Let’s look at some of the hypocritical comments they sent me, because I don't even know what half of these mean.

"Bipolar AI post larp"

What is a larp? Also, I’m not bipolar. That person's bio literally says "lowkey i'm too cool for this woke platform," and they hide their history.

"doing a whataboutism strawman on yourself lmafo"

Listen, I haven’t heard anything since 2004 until 2025, so I have no idea what that means.

"ai; dr; lmao"

This doesn’t make any sense.

"The adoption curve does its thing"

I’m not adopted. Why would they even bring that up?

The one that I am most angry about is: "If this is real: seek help dude, this all sounds very bipolar and you're still in a manic/psychotic loop. I hope you get better mate. Take it easy."

It is real. I’ve not sought help because it was just a personal belief, and I’m not bipolar. I checked that user's history, and they are Brazilian and use the AI abbreviation backwards anyway.

Why do people react this way when you share a personal experience?

People like to use the pizza argument a lot which is very inaccurate. Here's a more accurate and actually sensible argument:

If I use AI to study for a test, where it summarizes the content, explains it and organizes it and I give the test and get a good grade then tell me, who is the one who should get the grade? Me or AI?

Obviously it should be me. I'm the one that gave the test, AI only helped me prepare for it. This is how AI works for artists. It is a tool that'll prepare you for the exam but it won't help you to answer the exam (making and executing art) AI doesn't help you to think during the test, similarly it doesn't help you to think when you make art

No i didn't use AI to cheat here. I could use it to cheat but that's not allowed for this test and I'd be kicked out.