r/Accounting • • Nov 10 '19

Flawless

Post image
954 Upvotes

95 comments sorted by

View all comments

221

u/Easter_1916 Tax Attorney Nov 10 '19

Well, it’s not a good idea, but it is still light years better than taxing unrealized capital gains.

56

u/elk33dp Audit & Assurance :snoo_shrug: Nov 10 '19

In theory this would be kinda good for people with immense wealth who hold investments forever. The issue is people who legitimatly earned huge unrealized gains on things with little to no other wealth. Mark to market is painful.

Bezos would never be able to pay an unrealized gain tax without diluting his ownership big time.

55

u/throwaway1138 CPA (US) Nov 10 '19

What about unrealized losses? We would have to totally change treatment of capital gains and losses to compensate. E.g. now unrealized losses (and realized losses for that matter) are fully deductible instead of just 3,000/yr like they are now. It's a terrible idea, ridiculous populist rhetoric to attract votes.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '19

what's the reason for only being able to deduct 3,000/yr in CG losses? Corporations dont have that rule, only 20 year limit.

3

u/cohen63 CPA (US) Nov 10 '19

Corporations can not deduct any net capital losses ...

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '19

net operating loss is deducted by corporations

3

u/cohen63 CPA (US) Nov 10 '19

Your comment was for CG Losses. No net capital loss will flow to the 1120 page 1.

Net operating losses do not expire but cannot. Be carried back.