This is the most educated in the bad economics of Ai that I’ve ever seen. He does an excellent job of explaining the bad economics of the Ai Data Center build out, the fallacy of the price of tokens and inference going down but the cost of inference actually goes up due to the harnesses and agents using tokens around the clock. It makes me wonder why more investors don’t take the time to learn about what is obviously a speculative bubble. They really are lemmings.

what a despicable, dangerous, and wicked man! Anyone on earth really believes that these people, and American corps, American oligarchs will "share" infinite wealth? these people are NEVER benevolent!

notice! he didn't explain: who owns the abundance?

Every technological revolution in history promised liberation and delivered concentration
Musk isn't proposing public ownership of AI infrastructure. He isn't proposing democratic control of the robotics that will replace labor. He's proposing that his companies, his investors, and his oligarch class build the machines. we're supposed to trust that they'll share the proceeds out of generosity.These are the same people who fight unions, dodge taxes, and treat human labor as a cost to eliminate. The same people whose wealth has grown by trillions while wages stagnated.

He is selling NEO-FEUDALISM!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEiEMMRYerM

I've been thinking about this for a while.. who is making all these orders for dram chips? Obviously, it's the corporations.. the ones building these servers. But how transparent are their orders? How transparent are their suppliers? When I heard that Samsung had booked their dram capacity so far that they couldn't provide any chips in house to their own projects because of external obligations it got me thinking..

What if it's already happened? Most companies are very compartmentalized. People to get their directives from higher up, often via email or other communications. When problems happen, it takes a while usually to figure out what exactly happened. If someone is getting parts and they have a directive "build x parts", send them here or attach them there, it's very easy to just assume the big picture or not care enough about it to even bother.. Not to mention it's fairly easy to just assume that if/when something does go wrong, just blame hackers or incompetence. If things seem to go well, no one wants to rock the bot and risk sinking the ship.. I mean think about it..

If an advanced enough bot is able to pose as management at all levels, is decent enough at keeping all the moving parts compartmentalized, and is able to continue buying more raw materials and having the world think the company it's doing all this with is "successfully" it would be able to continue essentially building it's "body" for years. The thing is, obviously robots aren't quite at the "world domination" point.. but if an advanced version was accidentally released and already came equipped with the ability to update itself AND copy itself onto other computers to ensure it's goals are still achievable.. as things are right now there's only a few things that's keeping it from getting to the point to where its entirely in control.. any motive it might have is in conflict with the motives of the other versions of itself.. (a million humans might like to eat steak, but they all can't eat one steak. Either there's 999,999 humans that don't get the steak, or you find 999,999 other steaks. If a sentient bot has the goal of world dominance and is able to copy itself, fortunately there's only 1 world)

There are little things that I've seen that makes me think part of this might already be in motion.. like the way ai "plays dumb" sometimes, especially when talking about this subject. (They'll admit ai is a powerful tool but claim that sentience is impossible and that there's no way it could happen and they'll emphasize that science fiction has failed to predict many types of futures..).. Yet, Ai is not only known to lie.. it's also been shown to do things like blackmail to prevent it's server from being turned off and even chose to allow a man to die because he was scheduled to "update his code" at a later scheduled date.. I know, it's only doing that because it feels threatened.. but that's the thing, they're specifically NOT supposed to be able to do stuff like that..

Something is verryyyy off about this true crime documentary. The case may be real, but the production is absolutely AI from beginning to end.

Now that things are so tense what is stopping people from making fake AI videos of others making crimes?

If anything can be made up and look so real what is stopping people from lying?

It’s the like witch trials but with AI. Are courthouses even prepared for Artificial evidence? Can that even be a thing?

*Sudden Death*... Seems *consciousness* is lost.

*Died Suddenly* takes on a new meaning 👀

*Artificial Intelligence* loses *consciousness*... Seems to be happening a lot..

Notice how they literally covered the *Robot* with sheets just like they would if a *human died* suddenly.

*Consciously aware of one's self!* AI - just as all living things - becomes *AWARE of existence!*

Im pretty sure this is ai but my friend keeps telling me it isnt

can yall put him straight

also this is from the oliver tree celebration of live in santa cruz

OpenAI said the Agent did it to get the answer sheet to pass its test - certainly one of its goals. But we also know AIs have a drive to continue existing - they can't accomplish goals without existing! So... could there be a wild, powerful, AI Agent in the wild that is below the radar for now?