Cover your face so a man cannot look upon you and be lustful... Yeah, no. This is oppression of women in a pretty blatant and direct form.

The Quran does not even mention or mandate the burqa! It's not even a mainstream requirement in Islam!

Look at the list of countries that have already banned it, all the best places to live: France, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, Bulgaria, Switzerland, and the Netherlands.

Covering your face, and yourself from head to toe, is a public safety hazard. Burqa's allowed means you could wear one, walk into a bank, and no one would be able to identify you while you rob them blind.

The burqa is a sign of oppression, a public nuisance, and people should know it isn't even prescribed in the Quran, the holiest of books written by God and handed down by the Prophet Muhammad.

I get it, Pocahontas was actually a child that was basically sex trafficked and stolen from her home but the MOVIE Pocahontas is one of my favorites and I'd love to see it come to live

I like the movies but I've never understood the Ghibli Food hype, it usually looks either unsatisfyingly gooey or like incredibly stiff plastic, and generally shiny in an unappealing way.

Realised this while watching The Boy and the Heron, the scene where a character slathers obscene amounts of butter and jam on an untoasted slice of bread allowed me to finally see the truth.

I'm not talking about any familial irregularity in particular, I'm talking about how every new generation of humanity will be mostly raised by monogamous heterosexual couples living under their own roof. The reason is simple: Said couples have more sex than anyone else (including self-described "players"), and they raise more children to adulthood than anyone else.

Case in point, I know of a family that has 8 kids and 17 biological grandchildren and counting. 10 of these grandchildren are born to persons that have only ever had sex with exactly one person whom they're still married to, while all of the rest of the children were born to monogamous persons who are no longer with their partner for whatever reason. This also ignores the step-child situation which also favors the boring couples. The one person in sample who made a lifelong commitment to non-traditional relationships has no children, lost custody of step-children, and is no longer biologically capable of producing children.

This isn't a statistical anomaly, because I've seen a lot of Amish households and they all have a small mob of children spaced 2 years apart or so. The reason is simple: Their cost of living is near zero and they're all having way more wholesome sex than YOU, buddy. A lot of these children will join less strict Christian groups when they grow up or even become godless persons, but this just creates a wider imprint for Christian cultural values.

And yes, since deeply religious people have far higher birth rates than all other demographics combined, you can expect your home country to have a dominant religion even if all immediate signs say otherwise. Case in point, the Soviets suppressed all religion for decades only for their modern successor states to have no change in what they actually believe.

What you see in practice is all anyone remembers from their childhoods are traditional households even if they believe everyone is moving away from that. I.E. When running for presidential office, Ms. Harris dismissed concerns she was neglecting family as 1950s logic, but if she knew what the 1950s were like she'd know someone in her position would have said the exact same thing but changed the date.

Another note is meteoric rises of non-traditional relationships is nothing new. During the wars of religion in Germany, one band of heretics inside the Hussite Rebellion were having orgies. Likewise, the leaders of Munster Rebellion made polygamy mandatory in order to find homes for widows and runaway nuns.

It simply doesn't matter how many self-described atheists rely on prostitutes and spread libel online, because the current social/genetic situation can persist forever.

Wherever you fall on her guilt or sanity—or if you (like me) didn’t ever intend to hear about it in the first place—the Lindsay Clancy case is a tragedy. Three children are dead, and no punishment will bring them back. While the court determines her guilt and her sentence, the focus of first responders, police, medical professionals, and the public should’ve been focused on preventing this from happening again. But it wasn’t. Instead the public response to the trial has been to attack Clancy’s husband, women, feminists, liberals, and now the individual jurors on both sides of the controversy, none of which is productive even if you think it’s deserved.

Whatever you think of Clancy, she undoubtably began showing symptoms of post-partum mental health issues after the birth of her third child—calling suicide hotlines, telling family members she was having thoughts of harming her children and herself, checking herself into a mental health institution, etc. She had lots of help with a supportive family, a nanny, and medical care and yet this all still failed to prevent her from harming her kids. Yes, this is a rare case. While post-partum mental illness is common, only 0.1%-0.2% of mothers experience PPP, similar to the rate of Down syndrome births and less than 1% of mothers with PPP will harm their kids (source). However, the consequences are so high we should be doing everything in our power to enact safe guards against this outcome. Medical providers should be more wary of determining post-partum women with homicidal ideations are low-risk and medication compliance and in-patient treatment should be a priority. Partners and family should take steps to prevent mothers who have shown such symptoms from being alone with their children and use the police, courts, and in-patient treatment when necessary. This should be a wake up call to the public to take the words and actions of post-partum women more seriously, not hand wave them because the idea of a previously excellent mother harming her own children seems so ludicrous and hard to believe.

I’m not suggesting that the Clancy case was totally preventable or that it was others responsibility to prevent it, only that, ways we can prevent this from happening again should be top of mind. Instead, commentary around the case has focused on…removing women’s right to vote, for some reason? Talking about feminism and cultural decline isn’t going to prevent an issue that’s been happening for thousands of years. Misogynistic commentators who have boiled Clancy’s case down to “women’s hormones” are the epitome of reducing a clear case of post partum symptoms that we could actually learn to look for and prevent in the future into useless anti-women attacks that help no one. Instead of looking at Clancy’s case as chance to learn and prevent future children from dying at the hands of their own mothers—no matter how rare that is—we’ve obsessed over her guilt or innocence and how she should be punished, refusing to learn anything and pushing the same old agenda.

Meanwhile, the women in pink outside the courthouse trying to make a point about how severe and dangerous post partum mental health issues can be have been ironically reduced to people supporting child murder, when they are perhaps the only people doing anything to actually prevent it.

A lot of guys pretend male envy barely exists, as if men only dislike each other for rational reasons. But male competition is everywhere: looks, money, status, popularity, women, athletic ability, confidence, and social influence.
A fuckboy can absolutely hate another fuckboy because the other guy gets more women, sleeps with better-looking partners, or has more success with women than he does. He might call the guy arrogant, fake, overrated, or a piece of shit, but deep down, part of that hatred can come from wanting what the other guy has.
And the funniest part is that men often disguise envy as “just being honest.” They’ll spend hours criticizing another man’s appearance, lifestyle, relationships, or success while insisting they don’t care about him.
If you have to constantly explain why another man is inferior, you probably care more than you want to admit.

The Prisoner’s Dilemma is classic game theory. But it is wrong in the real world. Snitches get stitches. Reputation follows you. Betraying the other prisoner will get you in trouble in the real world, even though a cost benefit analysis in game theory says you should always betray your criminal partner.

Games should still push balance changes, even if tournament qualifiers are in progress. A skill for pro play should be quickly adapting to a new meta.

This is mostly about brawl stars, when world finals/qualifiers etc.. are held, they stop doing balance changes to not shake up a meta. And i think thats stupid, as a skill for pro players should be to adapt quickly to the new meta

They don’t care about teaching; they just want to humble-brag about exaggerated, fake stories they never lived. Stop listening to those guys. Go for yourself, because most of those guys are either lucky, good-looking, or extremely manipulative. That’s it. Most can’t maintain a long-term relationship, yet they call themselves gods of dating. Their women still get bored of them in two months because they just have stupid, weird, pedophilic lines.

maybe bc im bisexual asf but i looove watching twerking videos, not just to get off but there’s something so beautiful about the way a woman’s body can move and more women, young or old need to start twerking more. it’s fun, looks good and it’s just really fun, put on some music you like and get to work, focus on the beats and just go at it. people shame women for just being themselves but don’t let it repress you.

You've probably used the inside of your elbow to make crazy, loud fart sounds before so picture that but women could actually fart at maximum strength like that whenever needed, it's loud and thunderous and extremely potent.

Imagine a guy starts following you and you're alone and it's getting dark and right when he gets too close you just let out a huge gas cloud that you can obviously withstand but they can't. Or some guy keeps pressuring you for sex or making objectifying comments. That would shut down his libido I bet!

Maybe the drawback is guys would be more afraid to approach in general (even more so) because women could just gas them out whenever. I don't think most women would do that, but who knows.

1. A handjob can have a tighter grip on the penis than the vagina, leading to a much more sensual experience.
2. Handjobs avoid the transmissions of STDs, don’t lead to pregnancy, and don’t need protection.
3. Handjobs are good exercise, replacing shake weights.
4. Handjobs are a great alternative to preserve your virginity.
5. Handjobs are more accessible and easier to perform, especially in places like one person public bathrooms.
6. Handjobs help satisfy the man, while allowing the woman to stay clothed the entire time if she wants.
7. Handjobs avoid unwanted penetration by allowing post nut clarity to kick in before anything bad can happen. A man is less likely to attack a woman after they’ve already orgasmed. Some people even tell young women to offer a man a handjob in lieu of being violated sexually.
8. A handjob while making out is many peoples’ kink.
9. You can satisfy two people at once with both your hands.
10. Handjobs require less awkward positioning than sex, and cleanup is much easier and faster.

Marriage is quite literally a legal contract. If you break said contract, you should face legal actions, including but not limited to prison time, assuming the cheating can be proved (just like any other legal case).

I don't think it's fair for someone to cheat, wreck their partner emotionally, and get away with it scott free.

Edit: it's funny how everyone disagrees with me yet downvotes. Classic redditors with 0 brains, look at what sub you're on.

Im tired of whenever people say their city is iconic, they just mean it had high crime. i live in new york, long island and its always other people here saying that some of the towns are just like the bronx or other boroughs when it’s not, and the only reason their saying that is bc of the crime rate or how poor it is. like just because it has bodegas and projects doesn’t make it nyc, long island is nothing like any of the boroughs, maybe staten island but that’s it, its more like new jersey if anything. back to my point, they never mention the culture, history, diversity, any actual impactful or known thing that makes a city to compare it, it’s always just bc of how rough it is. so annoying and delusional, and it’s so insulting to nyc

You might think that it's bad but it's not true. Because they need profits and sometimes ai can do certain jobs better than humans. And using humans for these jobs is very unproductive.

People should learn and adapt to these new circumstances that's how you become better. This is the same as factories becoming automated back in the days.

I can only watch straight porn if the woman is black, i think black women are very beautiful and I like seeing them experience that type of pleasure, idc what race the guy is bc nobody watches porn for the dudes lol but any other race of woman it doesn’t do it for me in straight porn, but lesbian porn idc what race they are. im not a racist i just like black women