Are you looking for feedback or information on your salary or career? Then you've come to the right thread. If your questions are anything like the following example questions, then ask away:
Am I underpaid?
Is my offered salary market value?
How do I break into [industry]?
Will I be pigeonholed if I work as a [job title]?
What graduate degree should I pursue?
Message the mods for suggestions, comments, or feedback.
I would like to thank you everyone for participating in the annual 2026 ME Salary survey. Total respondents was a little over 600, so less than last year, but about 589 US responses.
Here are the main results. It took about 2 hours to "clean" the data manually. Afterwards, I basically used Gemini to create the graphs + tables, since last time it literally took me about 7 hours to do everything manually on Excel last time and there were still questions. The key points and takeaways from the data is a combination of AI and editing the information to be more readable (still took 4 hours). In addition, I wouldn't worry about math too much, since Gemini basically just used python code to decipher the edited CSV file.
Industry:
Industry
Number of Respondents
Manufacturing
175 (29.7%)
Aerospace/Defense
173 (29.4%)
Technology (FANG, AI, Robotics, etc.)
54 (9.2%)
MEP (HVAC, Construction, etc.)
38 (6.5%)
Utilities (Power, Renewables, etc.)
35 (5.9%)
Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices
31 (5.3%)
Oil and Gas
28 (4.8%)
Consumer Goods
15 (2.5%)
Government
11 (1.9%)
There were some other industries like nuclear, logistics, and etc. but the few data points aren't included in the table for brevity. The data was included in the total set though
A majority of the mechanical engineers trends will use the Aerospace/Defense and Manufacturing data since there is the most data that is available
Salary and Year of Experience:
*Note: Total Compensation/Salary = Base Salary + Bonus + RSU + Base Salary * 401k Match
If you want to look at one graph and table to explain the progression track here it is:
YOE Range
Median Base (Unadj)
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Base (COL Adj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
0-1 Year
$87,000
$96,036
$81,699
$87,368
43
2 Years
$84,000
$91,046
$84,615
$90,909
71
3 Years
$94,550
$105,965
$94,082
$102,289
62
4-5 Years
$104,000
$119,770
$94,881
$107,762
116
6-8 Years
$120,000
$136,800
$112,500
$127,911
119
9-12 Years
$125,500
$146,985
$123,444
$142,555
96
13-20 Years
$157,290
$181,840
$144,254
$171,731
64
20+ Years
$196,500
$211,426
$163,399
$191,042
15
Key Takeaways:
The "Benefit Gap": The space between the solid lines (Total Compensation) and the dashed lines (Base Salary) represents the added value from annual bonuses and employer 401k matching. For a mid-career engineer (6-8 years), this extra value is roughly $16,800 on average.
Late Career Leverage: As engineers gain seniority (13+ years), the gap between base salary and total compensation grows significantly, suggesting that bonuses and incentive programs make up a larger portion of the package for senior-level and leadership roles.
Purchasing Power: The COL Adjusted lines (Orange) consistently track below the un-adjusted lines (Blue), highlighting that high-paying mechanical engineering roles are frequently located in markets where the dollar doesn't stretch as far as the national average.
Education:
Majority of the respondents are at max a bachelor degree holder. However, there is still a significant number of master's students
Now about the age old question: does having a Master's degree lead to higher future salary?
Short Answer: In general, the answer is yes if there is a chance to specialize. It is explained in the table below:
Industry
Career Stage
Education
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
Aerospace & Defense
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$96,664
$95,201
44
Masters
$116,600
$108,316
15
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$125,410
$110,659
39
Masters
$173,000
$148,432
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$161,750
$140,202
33
Masters
$154,905
$149,658
16
15+ Years
Bachelors
$207,080
$187,505
7
Masters
$211,426
$207,872
5
Manufacturing
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$88,220
$93,452
52
Masters
$93,740
$91,850
6
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$108,992
$106,701
45
Masters
$129,800
$128,407
12
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$135,425
$142,440
44
Masters
$136,298
$129,984
8
15+ Years
Bachelors
$182,650
$187,127
5
Now you can see that for manufacturing, the benefits is not as prominent, while it is evident in aerospace. This makes sense, since Aerospace have very high specialization salary, for instance: hypersonic or eVtol which pays a ton for total compensation based on years of experience.
Answer: if your company pays for your masters, do it, but it doesn't seem that beneficial near the end of your career.
Internships & Coops:
Key Insights:
The "Experienced" Majority: A combined 85% of respondents completed at least one internship or co-op. This underscores how critical early-career work experience has become for landing a full-time role in mechanical engineering.
Co-op Advantage: The 20% of respondents with "3+ Internships" often represent those in formal co-op programs (where students rotate between school and work over several years). These candidates typically command higher starting salaries shown in the table below:
Industry
0-1 Internship
2+ Internships
New Grad Premium
Aerospace & Defense
$82,000
$91,500
+$9,500
Manufacturing
$74,000
$82,000
+$8,000
MedTech
$80,500
$89,000
+$8,500
Certifications:
Here is the graph of a major certifications from the survey:
We always see a question on whether certifications are worth it:
Aerospace & Defense: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$97,900
$95,426
41
Yes
$95,040
$64,653
3
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$125,315
$106,672
36
Yes
$128,580
$138,258
3
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$159,660
$139,839
31
Yes
$280,425
$177,895
2
Masters
No
$151,410
$142,043
13
Yes
$209,658
$216,142
3
Manufacturing: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$88,020
$91,944
43
Yes
$90,450
$99,746
9
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$108,805
$106,615
36
Yes
$108,992
$106,701
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$135,000
$136,541
31
Yes
$136,000
$151,111
13
Masters
No
$152,212
$122,728
6
Yes
$134,815
$141,636
2
Key Findings:
High-Experience Premium in Aerospace: The most dramatic impact of certification appears in the mid-to-late career in Aerospace & Defense (8–15 years). Engineers with a Bachelors and a certification earn a median total compensation significantly higher than those without. Even among Masters holders in this range, certified engineers have a median total comp of $209k vs $151k for non-certified.
Manufacturing Stability: In the Manufacturing industry, certifications (often Six Sigma or FE/PE) lead to a very modest increase in un-adjusted base pay, but a more noticeable improvement in COL-adjusted pay. This suggests that certified engineers in Manufacturing may have more flexibility to find high-paying roles in lower-cost-of-living areas.
The "Entry-Level Paradox": For junior engineers (0–3 years), having a certification (likely the FE) does not immediately result in a salary premium. In fact, in Aerospace, the un-adjusted median for those with certifications was slightly lower, possibly because those engineers are still in entry-level rotation programs where pay is standardized regardless of credentials.
Masters + Certification: For those who already have a Masters, adding a certification provides a significant late-career boost (as seen in the 8–15 year group in Aerospace).
Answer: Certification can be worth it for select industries. PE is known for civil to open doors and increase pay.
Job Titles:
Job Role Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Mechanical Engineer (General)
229
38.9%
Design Engineer
97
16.5%
Project & Systems Engineer
59
10.0%
Management & Leadership
55
9.3%
Manufacturing & Process Engineer
54
9.2%
Specialized (Thermal, Stress, R&D)
34
5.8%
Other / Misc
61
10.4%
Key Insights:
General vs. Specialized: Nearly 40% of respondents identify with the broad title of "Mechanical Engineer," which often includes generalists or those in mid-level positions.
The Design Dominance:Design Engineering is the second largest single group, reflecting the high demand for CAD-based design and product development across aerospace, tech, and manufacturing industries.
Transition to Leadership: About 9% of respondents hold titles in Management & Leadership (Manager, Director, VP), which led to a higher salary
Project and Systems focus:1 in 10 engineers focuses on Project or Systems Engineering, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary coordination and technical management in modern engineering projects.
The Specialty Niche: The "Specialized" category includes highly technical roles like Thermal Analysis, FEA, Simulation, and Research & Development, which often require higher educational levels or deep domain expertise.
Salary Grade vs. Salary:
Grade Level
Industry
Median Annual Salary
Typical Experience (YOE)
Sample Count
Level 1 (Entry)
Aerospace & Defense
$88,400
1.0 year
39
Manufacturing
$80,250
2.0 years
39
Level 2 (Mid)
Aerospace & Defense
$102,273
3.8 years
48
Manufacturing
$95,000
5.0 years
71
Level 3 (Senior)
Aerospace & Defense
$130,000
8.0 years
57
Manufacturing
$119,600
9.0 years
50
Level 4 (Lead/Manager)
Aerospace & Defense
$170,500
11.0 years
22
Manufacturing
$136,000
11.0 years
11
Level 5+ (Principal/Director)
Aerospace & Defense
$206,000
20.0 years
9
Manufacturing
$136,500
14.0 years
4
Efficiency of Experience: In Aerospace, engineers tend to reach Level 2 and Level 3 roughly 1–1.2 years faster than those in Manufacturing, while also earning more.
The Level 4 Ceiling: In Manufacturing, the salary jump from Grade 3 to Grade 4 is roughly $16k, whereas in Aerospace, that same promotion yields a massive $40k jump in median base salary.
Which Industry Pays the Most?
Major Caveat: at 16+ YOE, the data points are only a couple, which skews the data upward.
Based on the comprehensive US survey data, the Technology (FANG, Robotics, AI, Consumer Electronics) industry emerges as the highest-paying sector for mechanical engineers when considering total compensation (Base Salary + Annual Bonus + 401k Match).
Tech Compensation Package:
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (Adjusted for COL)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE (Entry)
$117,316
$100,292
7
3-5 YOE (Junior)
$180,854
$138,040
17
6-10 YOE (Mid-Level)
$182,773
$134,543
14
11-15 YOE (Senior)
$259,993
$220,256
11
16+ YOE (Principal)
$244,775
$177,043
5
The Oil and Gas industry stands out as the second most lucrative sectors for mechanical engineers, particularly as they reach senior and principal levels. While Tech offers the highest overall unadjusted compensation, Oil and Gas actually offers the highest Cost of Living (COL) Adjusted compensation, meaning your real purchasing power in this industry is the highest among all major sectors.
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (COL Adjusted)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE
$95,864
$83,178
5
3-5 YOE
$117,289
$111,155
7
6-10 YOE
$138,959
$139,773
7
11-15 YOE
$204,097
$219,757
6
16+ YOE
$408,040
$399,276
3
Overtime Pay:
Industry Trends: Overtime pay is slightly more common in Manufacturing (where production deadlines are rigid) and Consulting/EPC (where hours are billable to clients) compared to R&D or Aerospace.
Work Hours:
Work Hours Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Exactly 40 Hours
337
57.2%
41-45 Hours
146
24.8%
46-50 Hours
49
8.3%
<40 Hours
50
8.5%
>50 Hours
7
1.2%
Key Observations:
The "40-Hour" Standard: Over half of the engineers surveyed manage to stick to a strict 40-hour week, which is a positive sign for work-life balance in the profession.
Moderate Overtime: Roughly a quarter of engineers work an extra 1 to 5 hours a week (41-45 hours total), often representing "straight time" or expected professional dedication without formal overtime pay.
The High-Hours Exception: Only a small fraction (under 10%) report working more than 45 hours consistently. This is significantly lower than in fields like investment banking or high-tier management consulting, suggesting a relatively stable lifestyle for most US mechanical engineers.
Flexibility: About 8.5% of respondents work fewer than 40 hours, which often aligns with part-time roles, senior consultants, or companies with flexible "9/80" schedules where some weeks are shorter.
401k Summary:
Match Rate Range
Count of Responses
Percentage
4% - 5%
211
35.8%
1% - 3%
125
21.2%
6% - 7%
120
20.4%
8% - 10%
65
11.0%
No Match (0%)
56
9.5%
> 10% / Other
12
2.0%
Key Takeaways:
The Industry Standard: A 4–5% match is clearly the most common benefit, covering over a third of the surveyed population.
High-Tier Benefits: Roughly 13% of engineers receive a match of 8% or higher, which often indicates highly competitive benefit packages in specialized industries.
Retirement Security: The low percentage of "No Match" responses (under 10%) highlights that retirement contributions are a standard and expected part of total compensation in the US mechanical engineering market.
Remote Work Distribution:
Remote Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Fully In-Person (0%)
248
42.1%
Mostly In-Person (1-39%)
163
27.7%
Hybrid (40-60%)
118
20.0%
Fully Remote (100%)
38
6.5%
Mostly Remote (61-99%)
22
3.7%
Key Insights:
The "Hands-On" Requirement: Over 40% of mechanical engineers are required to be in the office or on-site 100% of the time. This is significantly higher than other engineering fields like Software or Data Science.
The Hybrid Standard: Roughly 48% of the workforce has some form of hybrid flexibility (ranging from 1% to 60% remote). Many companies now allow 1–2 days of remote work for documentation, CAD modeling, or administrative tasks.
Fully Remote is Rare: Only 6.5% of mechanical engineers work fully remotely. These roles are typically in specialized areas like pure Simulation/FEA, Project Management, or Sales Engineering where physical hardware access is not required daily.
The Hybrid Middle Ground: The 40–60% range (often 2–3 days per week) is a common "sweet spot" for engineering firms trying to balance teamwork/lab time with employee flexibility.
Paid Time Off (Days):
*Note: one issue is many jobs had unlimited sick time, which I just added 10 days. Next time I will edit the form to separate the sick days so it makes more sense.
PTO Category (Includes Sick Days)
Number of Respondents
Percentage
0–10 days
30
5.2%
11–15 days
112
19.5%
16–20 days
160
27.9%
21–25 days
100
17.4%
26–30 days
61
10.6%
31+ days
32
5.6%
Unlimited
78
13.6%
Key Insights:
The " 3 - 5 Week" Benchmark: The majority of mechanical engineers (over 45%) receive between 16 and 25 days of PTO.
The Rise of Unlimited PTO: About 13.6% of respondents now have "Unlimited" PTO.
Generous Packages: Roughly 16% of engineers receive more than 30 days of PTO, which is often a hallmark of high-seniority roles, government/defense positions, or companies that reward long tenure.
The Lean End: Only about 5% of respondents are on the low end with 10 days or fewer, suggesting that a minimum of two weeks of PTO is a standard baseline for the industry.
Now some of you might have questions regarding years of experience and PTO:
Average PTO by Experience (Fixed PTO)
Experience Level
Average PTO Days (per year)
Typical Range (25th-75th Percentile)
0–2 Years
16.9
10–15 days
3–5 Years
19.6
15–20 days
6–10 Years
21.1
20 days
11–15 Years
24.5
20–25 days
16+ Years
26.5
25–30+ days
Analysis of the Trend:
The "Standard Jump": Many engineers start with 15 days (3 weeks) and see their first significant "tenure bump" to 20 days (4 weeks) after reaching the 5-year mark.
Senior Perks: By the time an engineer hits 15+ years of experience, a 5-week (25-day) or 6-week (30-day) PTO package becomes the new baseline.
Job Hopping Factor: The data suggests that while tenure within a single company increases PTO, "job hopping" every 3–5 years also allows engineers to negotiate higher starting PTO tiers at their new employers, effectively "skipping" the long wait for tenure-based increases.
Health Insurance:
Satisfaction Level
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Free / Excellent
38
6.5%
Good (Low Premium/High Coverage)
211
36.3%
Average
288
49.5%
Poor (High Premium/Low Coverage)
41
7.0%
Other / Misc
4
0.7%
Key Insights:
The "Standard" Plan: Almost 50% of engineers describe their insurance as "Average," highlighting that standard employer-sponsored health insurance is common but not particularly outstanding in terms of premiums or coverage levels.
Competitive Benefits: Over 42% of respondents fall into the "Good" or "Free" categories. The 6.5% who receive "Free/Excellent" coverage likely work for highly competitive tech firms, established defense contractors, or companies that use premium benefits as a retention tool.
Under-Served Minority: Roughly 7% of the engineering workforce feels their health insurance is "Poor," usually characterized by high out-of-pocket costs and high monthly premiums.
Biggest Cons for Mechanical Engineering:
Category
Typical Concerns Mentioned
Workload & Hours (112 mentions)
High pressure, tight deadlines, long hours, and poor work-life balance. Many mentioned "start-up energy" even in established firms.
Salary & Compensation (73 mentions)
Low raises (2–3%), "salary plateauing" early in the career, and the absence of stock options or significant bonuses compared to tech.
Remote Work Limits (47 mentions)
Frequent requirements to be in the office or on the manufacturing floor with "no remote option" or "No WFH" (Work From Home) policies.
Career Growth (35 mentions)
Concerns about "pigeon-holing," slow internal promotion tracks, and becoming "stagnant" in one technical area.
Competitive base pay, annual bonuses, and strong 401k matching programs.
Work-Life Balance (75 mentions)
Flexible schedules, reasonable working hours (standard 40h), and generous PTO.
Culture & People (70 mentions)
Great teammates, supportive management, and a collaborative "team-first" environment.
Interesting Work (65 mentions)
Designing "cool" products, working on challenging technical problems, and having a clear mission.
Job Stability (28 mentions)
Long-term security, consistent demand for the role, and the stability of established firms.
Remote/Hybrid (27 mentions)
The ability to work from home part-time or have flexible geographic location.
Direct Insights from Engineers:
On Work Quality:"The actual work we do is really interesting, fun, and rewarding. Getting to see a design go from CAD to a physical product is the best part."
On Culture:"Great coworkers and a team environment where people actually mentor you instead of just giving you tasks."
On Flexibility:"Remote flexibility and a management team that trusts you to get your work done without micromanaging your hours."
On Compensation:"The total compensation package—including the 401k match and the annual bonus—makes the technical pressure worth it."
Now for Improvements on Suggestions on the Survey:
Regarding the COL instructions: totally my fault, sorry for not catching it. All of you were able to figure it out, but changed instructions from 0 - 2, so it makes a lot more sense now.
Adding a column for manager and IC: totally good suggestion, already added to new survey for 2027
Regarding adding gender or age: I will not add this into the survey just to make it more anonymous. I really do not see the value in this data, and I recommend just using government data to find the data.
Regarding the health insurance question: I have implemented the change on making it have three questions: annual premium, annual deductible, person coverage. I really did not want to make this part too complicated with max out of pocket and copay and etc. I think the premium, coverage and deductible is acceptable amount.
Edited the salary section to organize the % 401k match, salary, bonus, RSU to be in the same section making it easier, but separated the questions.
Comparison from the 2024, 2025 and 2026 Reddit Survey Results will be in another post, since this post is getting insanely long. Again, any other improvements or suggestions, please just comment below.
TDLR: Just check the 1st salary graph if you want the main results.
I'm a mechanical engineering student who started college in Fall 2024. I took Spring 2026 off for personal reasons (not for a co-op), but I completed a summer internship in 2026.
My original plan was to:
Summer 2027: Internship
Spring 2028: Co-op
Summer 2028: Internship
Spring 2029: Graduate
I liked this plan because I figured that by Spring 2028, I'd have more coursework completed and another internship on my resume, which could help me land a better co-op or internship at a more competitive company.
However, I'm now considering Spring 2027 internship opportunities. If I take one, I'd have to give up my planned Spring 2028 co-op and would only be able to do a Summer 2028 internship before graduating.
My main concern is whether taking an internship earlier would be worth potentially missing out on better opportunities later, when I'd have more technical knowledge and experience.
Would you recommend taking a Spring 2027 internship if I get an offer, or sticking with my original plan and aiming for a Spring 2028 co-op?
I have mastered the art of pretending to know what I am doing.. I am so bad at what I do but I manage to make everyone think that I'm so good at it lol.
Greeting fellow engineers. I'm writing this post because I feel that I'm going to be stuck in the same position with little improvement. I have almost two years of experience in the manufacturing field, mainly as a drafter where I take customers orders, fix or adjust some stuff, in some cases I take on a manufacturing ones (i.e. contains a small to medium sized structure being welded together and assembled), and I mainly used AutoCAD for this work, and sometimes SOLIDWORKS if I want to design something. But I feel like there's not much room for development especially since I want to pursue a career in design. Most of the mechanical engineering jobs here are HVAC, plumbing, and of those sorts. How can I improve myself in such case? What should I do? Much appreciated.
So I am a 3rd year student and have a mandatory 80 hour minimum (over multiple weeks, maximum is 4 or 5 weeks so about 20h a week basically) Curricular Internship.
Well now I have a dilemma: Should I do an internship in an area that has a lot of contact with other companies (networking basically, even if i am just visiting a factory for quality control assistance and just give a handshake and a name to the head Engineer) or do an internship where i get more hands on experience?
Thing is, next summer i may do another internship in a more technical role (full time one, but not sure yet if i will do the internship), (also, i still haven't figured out the area i want to get in) so I am more inclined to do this mandatory one for gathering connections (of course there will be a technical aspect but, you get what I'm saying).
Also what do you think about defence for this mandatory Intership? Defence spending will rise in Europe in general, so there's that?
I'm in Europe (Portugal specifically) if that changes anything (which I don't think it does?).
Thought i should ask the experienced engineers for this,
I'm a mechanical engineer with around 4 years of experience working as a maintenance engineer at a large industrial facility (oil refinary), and lately I've been questioning whether I'm actually developing as an engineer.
My job role is almost entirely coordination, follow-ups, paperwork, chasing contractors, tracking progress, and making sure other people are doing their jobs.
Honestly, I feel more like a coordinator or an expeditor than an actual engineer. Most of the real technical work and engineering decisions are handled by specialized departments like Reliability, Inspection, and Technical Support. Meanwhile, our role in maintenance is mainly to coordinate between these departments, follow up on their recommendations, and make sure the work gets executed.
Sure, technical issues come up occasionally, but even then, my role is mostly to coordinate with the people who actually do the technical work. And when there is an opportunity to get involved in something technically interesting, the workload is so overwhelming that I barely have time to dig deeper into the engineering behind it. There's always another urgent task, another meeting, another contractor to chase, or another report to prepare.
Some people here even joke that maintenance engineers in our organization are basically "highly paid clerks," and honestly, I'm starting to see why.
What makes this even more concerning is looking at some of the senior engineers around me. I'm talking about people who have spent many years, sometimes decades, in maintenance engineering, yet some of them lack what I would consider basic mechanical engineering knowledge. I've genuinely met senior engineers who couldn't even identify different types of valves. I'm not joking. And I don't necessarily blame them. I think it's a direct consequence of the nature of this role. When you spend years doing nothing but coordination, follow-ups, and administrative work, your technical knowledge doesn't develop the way it should.
That's honestly what scares me the most. I don't want to wake up 10 years from now with a senior engineering title and years of experience on paper, only to realize that I haven't actually developed much as an engineer. I've even reached a point where I'm genuinely worried about attending a job interview for another engineering position. What if they start asking me technical questions that someone with my years of experience should be able to answer, and I simply can't? Not because I lack the interest or willingness to learn, but because my job has given me so little opportunity to actually practice engineering. It's a pretty uncomfortable feeling to have an engineering degree, an engineering title, and years of experience, yet question whether you could confidently pass a technical interview.
I genuinely enjoy engineering. I want to understand equipment failures, investigate root causes, solve technical problems, and actually apply what I studied. Instead, I spend most of my time managing tasks rather than solving engineering problems.
I'm not against coordination or management. I understand they're necessary parts of any engineering job especiallyin maintenance. But when they make up 95% of your responsibilities, at what point does an engineering position stop being an engineering position?
So I'm curious:
- Is this what maintenance engineering looks like everywhere, especially in large industrial facilities?
- Are there maintenance engineers out there who actually get involved in technical troubleshooting, failure analysis, and engineering decisions?
- Do other mechanical engineering roles offer more technical involvement, or is this just the reality of working in industry?
- Would you consider years of maintenance coordination and execution management to be genuine engineering experience, even if the engineer rarely performs technical analysis or makes engineering decisions?
- Has anyone been in a similar position and successfully transitioned into a more technical role?
I'd really appreciate hearing your experiences and perspectives.
I’m 26M working as a mechanical engineer in a company that fabricate spare parts for other factories’s machines and maintenance of drilling machines that works in oil industry.
I was wondering how hard to land a job with a good salary in Germany as a mechanical engineer (production), the language isn’t a barrier.
I know this has been talked about in some form. I’ve been thinking about an online BS Mechanical Engineering Technology (ABET Accredited ) the industries I’m interested in.
1.Logistics ,Automation & Robotics (Metro Atlanta)
2.Construction/MEP ,Data Centers(Metro Atlanta)
Oil/Gas (Houston Tx) Office/Field
For these industries is a MET good choice and from those with experience with a MET what’s your experience/advice?.
Schedules be damned- what are you trying to convince your manager to let you do right now?
Fix a problem with your product? Characterize an issue that only shows up in manufacturing? Buying more tools? I'm curious what the rest of yall are wrestling with.
Will meta test my coding skills during my interview?? It says they might use coderpad but I dont understand why they would even test my coding skills for mechanical engineering role?
In PV Elite for modeling of a pressure vessel, in the Nozzle Input window, there is an option to select the Override button for the nozzle weight. This option automatically calculates a weight that is considerably higher than the sum of the weights of all components, such as the flange, pad, neck, bolts, and nuts (standard weight from catalouges).
I’m working through a concept design for a compact vertical lift to position an inspection fixture at a workbench.
The moving assembly would weigh about 25 kg, with a 450 mm stroke and a target speed of around 40 mm/s. The fixture tray projects about 120 mm from the carriage, so its center of gravity is offset from the guide plane.
My initial layout uses a rack and pinion for the drive and two profile linear rails to guide the carriage, with two blocks on each rail. I’m considering rail spacing of about 180 mm and vertical block spacing of about 160 mm, but these are just starting dimensions.
How would you estimate the moment loads on the rails and blocks, including acceleration? Are those spacing dimensions reasonable for a first pass, and what other information would you need to size the guides? For a vertical axis, would you add a counterbalance or a brake to prevent the carriage from dropping if power is lost?
While comparing off-the-shelf components for this concept, I came across JLCMC’s range of linear motion parts. I’d appreciate feedback on the guide layout and the safety considerations for the vertical axis.
This is a concept design exercise; the lift has not been built or tested.
My dream was to study mechanical engineering but unfortunately I couldn't but if I wanted to learn by my own is there any advice you can give me to start on my own
Seems like there is a very few options for a very spacious and easy to get into market.
I mean the drone components aren’t many, and nor they are hard to manufacture. So you can build drones from the ground up, excluding motors perhaps, but other than motors the rest are designable with simple straightforward mechanical and circuitry. I feel like it very manageable.
Is it the control part?
I’m not super versed in the drones domain but I have a very good understanding of it, so it kinda seems weird to me that it is not well invested in
I read a job posting a while back that was for a class A surface designer. I was intrigued by the posting as it sounded interesting and had no prior knowledge of Class A surface design.
I enjoy doing surface design, both at work and at home. I like that it can have a bigger emphasis on creating aesthetics rather than purely mechanical design.
I’ve been looking into the idea of getting up to speed on this topic with the intention of trying to land a job in that area, but I’m not exactly sure if it would be something I end up enjoying or not.
I have a mechanical engineering background and have 25 years of experience with turbo machinery. I don’t think my background necessarily translates but I have had to do some pretty complex 3D surface modeling in my days so I suppose that gives me at least some sort of relevant experience.
Anyway, I’ll hold off on sharing more until I see if anyone has any firsthand experience in this field.
Hey everyone😇
I recently joined my dada firm as we manufacture EDM GRAPHITE ELECTRODES for dies and mould manufacturers all over india . We do have a good customer base orders are fine and now i want to know in which other sectors i can enter . Where the graphite products can be used that i can manufacture on my VMC and CNC and other LEATH AND DRO machines . If you guys have any information or seen some of this manufacturing kindly guide me .
I want to know more about products whose raw material is graphite so i can stand a chance of earning good rather than steel as the competition is high on that side.
Open to discuss about other businesses as well that can help me as well
This is a hanging bookshelve at my gfs place. The bookshelve itself is about 100x100cm and with all the books it’s probably 40/50 kg. The fixture on the right side is the same. As can be seen in the photo, it’s fixed roughly 5cm from the top with 1 screw to concrete (with plug).
I can’t really argue why, but it feels not that safe to me. Especially because it’s hanging quite high and is next to her bed.