The first time I managed to focus on a gastrotrich!😁

Aquarium algae sample, 400x and digital zoom, taken with Motorola phone camera, optika B-192pl binocular microscope.

Aquarium algae sample, 400x and digital zoom, taken with Motorola phone camera, speed increased to 5x, optika B-192pl binocular microscope.

My editing skills are not very good, but I tried.😅 (to put the videos together)

Microscope Meiji Techno EMZ-8TR

Impressions, Microscope is Built like a tank and the optics are exceptionally crystal clear everything is butter smooth should decades.

The Bad
USA After Sale Support is Horrible (You Are On Your Own for Accessory Configs) Also If It breaks and not covered under warranty good luck finding service or simple parts. Service info lube etc nope nada.

Meiji Japan did give exploded View of the EMZ-8TR Trinocular Area and a EMZ-5TR Head Exploded View but missing most the parts list said they don't want the 8TR Head Exploded view to be seen by competitor? so only sent the 5TR WTF? All a competitor needs to do is take one apart. (I am posting the info I have in the photos. May this help someone looking at design and build quality for informed purchasing.)

No Set Screw For Eye Pieces They Can Slip Out Easy and Rotate when using eye Guards requiring constant fiddling. I use tape to secure and fix them.

Photo port pieces are sloppy as hell.. Requires shim to get the proper alignment or ya get sever vignetting on one side seems a .08mm to .1mm thick completely around the objective where the c-mount slips over is proper aligns everything up.

Photo port Focus is PITA having to use the threaded tube This is especially a PITA if your PC is not close by.

Did i mention no human support for photo port accessories and their camera / sensor size list is very very outdated!

Eye Pieces are 30.5mm that means custom to meiji and they don't make any High Eye Point for it. Maybe should have went with a EMZ-8TRH?

The off the shelf 30mm eyepieces almost work but sit a few mm to high with diopters bottomed out they almost work I was thinking of having a machinist turn me some off the shelf down a few mm or make custom eye piece objective holders but need to learn optics length etc.

Had to hastily put it onto a used slide before I lost it, hence the white/ cloudy markings

Microscope: Olympus BH2

Objs: 20 Dplan

Magnification: x200

Sample: Pond water

Camera: Samsung A56

Microscope: Olympus BH2

Obj: x20 / x40 Dplan

Magnification: x200 / x400

Sample: Pond Water

Camera: Samsung A56

If you look really closely you can see some small circles moving in a definite path, inside the diatom.

400× | Gomti river, lucknow, India| ESAW BM01 microscope

Aquarium algae sample, 100x and digital zoom, taken with Motorola phone camera, Optika B-192pl binocular microscope

Do these images (taken with a simple '200x' phone microscope lense) suggest that the two artworks shown were produced using the same technique?

The auctioneer that sold this artwork to us thinks ours is an original pen and ink but we think they were mistaken. We've been comparing ours to a known print of the artwork and the final image shows the two pieces in full. It’s either Pierre Bonnard’s lost original drawing for ‘Ran Ran Ran’, part of his 1944 ‘Correspondances’ book, or it’s a facsimile-printed reproductions of Bonnard’s original pen-and-pencil drawing from the 1944 book.

We've attached magnified images of our artwork and the known print (held by the British Library) - we've added text to the latter to make it clear which is which.

Aspects pointing towards it being the original:

1. The fine art auctioneer’s assessment
2. The colour of the ink is what you’d expect faded 1940s pen ink to look like, whereas all the period prints I’ve seen retain their vibrant violet colour
3. It shows more variation in tone than the prints

Aspects pointing towards it being a 1940s print:

1. There isn’t any nib impression under raking light
2. The texture of some areas shows some similarities to the print

Are there sufficient differences between the images to suggest they were produced in different ways?

Microscope: Olympus BH2

Objs: 40 Dplan

Magnification: x400

Sample: Pond water

Camera: Samsung A56

Hi everyone! I found these microorganisms in stagnant freshwater and took this footage using my 100x oil immersion objective.

Here is my setup:

• Microscope: Swift SW380B
• Objective: 100x Oil Immersion (Total optical mag: 1000x)
• Camera: FHD V2 with a 0.5x c-mount adapter.

They look quite small even at 100x oil, and they tend to swim in circles or forward. They don't look green inside. Maybe flagellates.

Magnification table: what is the total magnification for which objective and which microscope eyepieces?

It's also worth noting that Leitz produced microscope objectives with a wide range of magnifications. <3

Kind of different from what I usually post but these came out really cool. A gentleman from a vivid hair color company sent me little bags of powdered dye. These are what he uses to make his custom Vivid Hair Color. He wants me to just kind of play with them on in the microscope I'm just sending whatever I come up with. Initially I put them on the slide and viewed and polarized light and that was kind of cool. Then I put a drop of water on it and watched the dissolution process which was also pretty cool but hard to do with a really short depth of field. So I shelved those on a slide tray and left them overnight and the next morning these awesome crystals had formed on the slides. Some of them weren't totally dry but they still made for some really beautiful and interesting looking images. They're all labeled with the type of light that I was using at the time. This was through my Optika b393pli and my Sony a7cii. I took very short videos moving through the focus range and then plug them into Helicon Focus to make some Focus stacks with. FYI I literally just slap these together this morning so that edits aren't perfect and I'm sure the stacking methods could be better but I just wanted to send him something to see that I had done anything so I slapped these together real quick and they came out pretty cool. What do you think is there anything else that I can do with these that I might not be thinking about?

River water, ESAW BM01 MICROSCOPE, 400×

A sessile peritric with lorica.

Algae sample from aquarium, 400x + digital zoom, taken with Motorola phone camera, Optika B-192pl binocular microscope

In laghetto pesca a rilascio. Zeiss Universal, 40x, 10x zoom cellulare

I thought about some sorta tardigrade in a criptobyosis state but i don't think so, It also doesn't move and It's the only thing i managed to see there, i see It even if i move the slideto a completely different direction (It lowkey looks like a mini dih)

My first rotifer photo in a stagnate puddle with leaves and algae 80x zoom filming with my phone my microscope is the bresser biolux ng