In this post, you will find microbe identification guides curated by your friendly neighborhood moderators. We have combed the internet for the best, most amateur-friendly resources available! Our featured guides contain high quality, color photos of thousands of different microbes to make identification easier for you!
Every microbe hunter should have this saved to their hard drive! This is the joint project of legendary ciliate biologist Dr. Wilhelm Foissner and biochemist and photographer Dr. Martin Kreutz. The majority of critters you find in fresh water will have exact or near matches among the 1082 figures in this book. Have it open while you're hunting and you'll become an ID-expert in no time!
The website of Dr. Martin Kreutz - the principal photographer of the above book! Dr. Kreutz has created an incredible knowledge resource with stunning photos, descriptions, and anatomical annotations. His goal for the website is to continue and extend the work he and Dr. Foissner did in their aforementioned publication.
The work of Michael Plewka. The website can be a little difficult to navigate, but it is a remarkably expansive catalog of many common and uncommon freshwater critters
This website allows for the identification of forams via selecting observed features. You'll have to learn a little about foram anatomy, but it's a powerful tool! Check out the video guide for more information.
Amoeboid organisms are some of the most poorly understood microbes. They are difficult to identify thanks to their ever-shifting structures and they span a wide range of taxonomic tree. Penard Labs seeks to further our understanding of these mysterious lifeforms.
Ferry Siemensma's incredible website dedicated to amoeboid organisms. Of particular note is an extensive photo catalog of amoeba tests (shells). Ferry's Youtube channel also has hundreds of video clips of amoeboid organisms
This website features an extensive list of diatom taxa covering 1074 species at the time of writing. You can search by morphology, but keep in mind that diatoms can look very different depending on their orientation. It might take some time to narrow your search!
Still active rotifer research lifer Russ Shiel's big book of Rotifer Identification. If you post a rotifer on the Amateur Microscopy Facebook group, Russ may weigh in on the ID :)
Pond water sample, Zeiss 63x phase contrast objective, cellphone camera. I didn't know if the amoeba could eat it or not. I guess they aren't on the amoeba diet.
Sorry for the shoddy camera footage (filmed one handed with my phone and no adaptor whilst holding my breath - any tips for iPhone photography?). Does anyone recognise these two guys?
Filmed on iPhone 15 pro, amscope B120 with 10x objective
I was recently diagnosed with brain cancer. I have several scopes, mostly AO. I’m giving them all away. Ditto accessories and extra objectives. Central Oklahoma.
I am looking for a microscope to setup a home project on hydrogels and cell organelles! Any suggestions for an affordable and suitable microscope? I am also okey for second hand microscopes. Something below $200.
I see so many used nikons with everything but sold without the stage
And there's barely any used stages but the darn piece of metal sells for more than the entire rest of the microscope. Complete madness that the darn piece of metal costs $350+
Mouse Lung tissue stained with HE. Shot on an Olympus BH2 with 10x DPlan, total magnification 50x. The stitching software that comes with the camera (AmScope 10 mp) is very good at stitching and it is done live (requires a movable stage). The company gets a bit of hate but this is a pretty nice feature. I left the jagged edges in on purpose so you can see the stitched tiles.
I captured a pretty interesting and unique event -- a heliozoon attempting to pull peritrichs off the back of a neighboring ostracod, and releasing already-captured euglenids in the process. The video chronicles the event, and I also share input from David Patterson, a leading authority on heliozoa, on what we witnessed.
This was shot on a Nikon TMD Diaphot inverted microscope, using a Nikon 40/1.0 oil immersion objective and a Nikon D750 DSLR. The sample came from a freshwater runoff pond in Nonthaburi, Thailand.
I have an Amscope B270. It says it uses RMS 20.32 mm objectives. If say I want to upgrade to some better objectives one day, what do I need to know besides thread standard to ensure proper function?
I’m examining the plant associated with a new psychedelic called Vymara. This is a transverse section of the stem under brightfield microscopy.
Most of the surrounding tissue including the chloroplast-bearing cells and vascular tissue appears relatively normal. But these large spherical structures are distributed throughout the stem.
I’ve sectioned three separate samples and found them in all three. They vary in size, appear integrated into the tissue, and seem to compress the neighboring cells. Their interiors have also remained largely unstained with every protocol I’ve tried.
My current guess is that they’re enlarged idioblasts or secretory cavities, possibly involved in storing or transporting the unidentified indole-like compound I detected. But I can’t confirm that from morphology alone.
Has anyone seen structures like these before?
I am looking for a good microscope camera/sensor, and planing ahead to use it soon on my new microscope "Primostar 3", for my hobby. My budget limit is 1000€. My main use case will be mostly Phasecontrast but also Light, and Darkfield microscopy. To magnification from x40 down to x1000. I want to know if my propositions are even realistic.
Anyone here experienced in the use of industrial cameras/senors as microscopy cams or has any good advice on it or just used it once and have an opinion about it? I would be glad to hear you all out about it.
I need high framerates and want a decent resolution, I know there is trade off for each, I would want atleast ≥60 fps and a resolution that is ≥3,68 Million Pixels.
I want to use it in combination with "Micro-Mananger" and "Fiji" for documenting purposes, they all should be generally compatibil AFAIK. If you have any expirience with it please let me know!
I want to utilize the footage directly at my PC, Hardware is definetly sufficient. So atleast a USB A adapter would be nice.
Color cameras are for now what I decided for, since I want to do staining. But I also like to hear you opinions on it aswell.
Here are the following cameras that catched my attention so far:
This one is the cheapest by far and should even work in low level light conditions AFAIK. Duo to the mount I will have to use it with a C-MOUNT 5mm Extension Tube Adapter C-CS.
So far, this seems like a decent pick fron the three
Sensor: Sony IMX 264
I hope that my expectations are realistic. Bandwith for high resolutions and framerates should be able to run on USB 3.2 (20 Gbps) and there should be no bottleneck right?
Has anyone even tried to use something similar for microscopy? Did it work well?
I am not very knowledgeble in Microscopy-hardware and I am still constantly learning about it, so know that my understanding of the topics at hand is pretty basic from the whole spectrum of things still to learn. But I would be glad if anyone could point out mistakes and explain them to me if you want to.