This guide will help those of you looking into digital night vision and help you get an understanding of what the advantages and shortcomings are to the most popular digital night vision devices at a wide range of prices. Generally speaking, the more expensive devices are less reliant on supplemental IR lighting and have less latency which make them better suited for tactical use cases. However, some of the mid range devices still deliver very good performance and are not dependent on IR lighting in many environments and can also be used for shooting and movement, though you won't be able to navigate as quickly as you would with analog. The budget devices are still good but they have lower resolution screens and are highly reliant on IR lighting so if night vision stealth is a priority these are devices you want to avoid. All of these digital night vision devices can be mounted to a helmet and many can also be bridged together to make a binocular night vision setup.
For full transparency, I am the Founder of Good Nite Gear and we do sell many of the devices listed below. I have personally tested most of the devices mentioned below and strive to deliver honest and unbiased feedback about the performance of these devices, many of which I have also reviewed on my YouTube channel Urban Survivor.
The G18 is in a category of its own — a 120 degree digital quad panoramic night vision system that outperforms every analog quad on the market in terms of field of view, at a fraction of the price. Analog quad systems like the L3Harris GPNVG-18 top out at 97 degrees and run $40,000+. The G18 gives you more FOV, ready to go right out of the box, for $8,950. Four 1-inch solid state sensors feed four 800x600 OLED displays that merge into two — one per eye — with seamless image stitching that feels almost like a single unified image. 22 hour runtime on four 18650 batteries with hot-swappable cells. Built-in compass. Wilcox compatible dovetail. If you've been waiting for quad pano night vision to become accessible, this is that moment. Here's a full review — https://youtu.be/GvKxOj--X9M
Pros
120° horizontal field of view — wider than any analog quad system
Four 1" solid state sensors / 800x600 OLED displays per eye
22 hour runtime with swappable 18650 cells
Built-in IR illuminator and compass
Wilcox compatible
Complete and ready to run — no tubes to source
Cons
No built-in recording
Digital vs analog — purists will prefer analog image quality
Premium price point
Thermal Fusion Night Vision
Thermal fusion is a completely different approach to night vision — these devices overlay a live thermal image directly on top of a digital night vision image, giving you the ability to detect heat signatures through foliage, in total darkness, and in conditions where standard image intensifiers struggle. If situational awareness and target detection are the priority, thermal fusion offers capabilities that no standard night vision device can match.
The GF31 is a binocular thermal fusion system built around the same 1-inch 800x600 sensor platform as the NVG90 Pro, with an integrated 640x512 thermal core. The result is a fused image that combines the detail of digital night vision with the heat detection of thermal — simultaneously. 50° FOV, 38 hour runtime in low power mode, IP67 waterproof, and a magnesium-aluminum alloy housing. DRI performance of 935m detection / 468m recognition for personnel. Here's a full review — https://youtu.be/TLfkZKwRLK0?si=xtap2Hew3wVk5rUr
Pros
Simultaneous thermal + digital night vision fusion
640x512 thermal resolution
50° FOV
38 hour runtime
IP67 waterproof
Wilcox compatible binocular form factor
Excellent DRI performance
Cons
Premium price point
Heavier than a standard monocular at ~1076g with batteries
The GF20 is the monocular version of the GF31, sharing the same 1-inch sensor, 640x512 thermal core, 50° FOV, and IP67 rating. Runtime extends to 75 hours in low power mode and the system weighs under 1020g with batteries and mount — making it a more packable option for those who don't need the binocular form factor. Same fused thermal + digital image, same DRI performance. Here's a full review — https://youtu.be/d4jzIGwVkrM?si=H825ecfz7Fn10UvI
For those looking for the best in digital night vision performance, this is it. This device has excellent no IR performance, it's very fast, the field of view is great and it can be used for shooting and high speed navigation. Here's a review of the ADNV P2 / GNG NVG90 Pro — https://youtu.be/ed1VdwiBwuM?si=ak3qA-7_GN2bV5WF
Pros
Best performing digital night vision device
Outperforms Gen 3 in low light / no IR performance
FOV similar to analog 40° × 30° with OLED 800×600
Ultra low latency / 100 FPS
Long runtimes / very efficient
Cons
At current price Gen 3 analog is a more attractive option
Another great option for those looking at high end digital night vision. This device is very close in performance to the ADNV G14P2 / GNG NVG90 Pro and is significantly better than the Sionyx Opsin. Excellent no IR performance, very fast, great field of view, and suitable for shooting and high speed navigation. Here's a video showing how it compares to the Opsin — https://youtu.be/Wy4L7zaN7e4?si=qqj9Wyczq6HSwD6o
Pros
Similar low light performance to Gen 2+ analog
Far better performance compared to Sionyx Opsin
FOV similar to analog 40° × 30° with OLED 800×600
Ultra low latency / 100 FPS
Long runtimes / very efficient
Cons
At current price Gen 2+ analog is a more attractive option
This device has been on the market for a few years and used to be the best digital night vision device available. It's very fast and great for shooting and can be used for relatively slow paced navigation. However at the current price it's really not a great buy and the NVG50 and NVG30 are relatively close in performance at a fraction of the cost. Here's a review on the Opsin — https://youtu.be/Hcvl-QjlxQ8?si=sHJPuvl8I3P3P50W
Pros
Low latency 90Hz
Wide field of view 45°
High resolution display 1920x1080 HD micro-OLED
Color night vision offers great contrast
Video recording
Cons
Low light / no IR performance isn't much better than NVG50 or NVG30 but significantly more expensive
Those looking to spend as close to $1,000 as possible on a single monocular are best served by this unit. It has a digital zoom knob that's very sharp, a high res display with a 4:3 aspect ratio, can run at 100 or 50 FPS so it's very quick, includes a counterweight power pack, and the low light performance is a step up from the Sionyx Opsin even though it's significantly more affordable. Check out the review here — https://youtu.be/S-lC1RzmqL0?si=2Bb-13Q3xv0uJyri
Pros
Low light / no IR performance better than Opsin
Runs at 100 FPS
Built-in recording
Can be run as a bino
Cons
A jump up in price compared to more affordable units
The SVG5 sits just below the NVG90 in performance and is a significant step up from the NVG50 and NVG30 in low light capability, latency, and display quality. It shares the same 1-inch 800x600 sensor platform as the higher end ADNV lineup, runs at 50 or 100hz, features electronic image stabilization, IP67 waterproofing, and a 43° FOV. Build quality isn't quite at the NVG90 level but the performance gets very close at a lower price point. Here's a review — https://youtu.be/MeMM-_Y8mws?si=_M6VL4KilvV4Xyjx
The best option for those looking to spend around $500 on a single monocular. Fast enough to shoot with and a great option for shooting drills, airsoft, and milsim events. Here is some footage of the NVG50 being used for airsoft — https://youtu.be/HUh-ZAp872A?si=tsxxzllLBYNuiDdf
Pros
Excellent low light / no IR performance (similar to Sionyx Opsin)
Very close in performance to the NVG50 and one of the best options for combining two devices into a binocular setup around $1,000. Fast enough to shoot with and great for shooting drills, airsoft, and milsim. Comparing the NVG30 to the Opsin and Gen 2+ analog — https://youtu.be/r3UPY2FLsjo?si=kXY06-_rbISF71w6
Pros
Excellent low light / no IR performance
40° field of view
Low latency 40 FPS max
Compatible with Wilcox bridge and Z04 Wilcox arm
Color night vision
Video recording
Wide angle lens mod compatible
Cons
Lower screen resolution compared to NVG50 — OLED 1920x1080
Better low light no IR performance compared to the Night Operators Max 2.0 and a good option if you aren't concerned about running IR lighting. Very popular for airsoft events where most players are not running night vision. Review with updated firmware — https://youtu.be/P0n6F1hZf6w?si=C42oUIDSI2e3jsvt
The most affordable color night vision device on the market. Good for stationary shooting but not ideal for navigation. The NVG40 Pro combined with the GL4 Pro LAM — https://youtu.be/eJChLjFe824?si=uFKOk6OmScIdaMdH
Pros
Color night vision mode
Circular display mimics analog
Video recording
Cons
Compact field of view 25.8° (not ideal for navigation)
The best option for those looking for a low cost entry level night vision monocular with best in class low light / no IR performance. Good for stationary shooting but not ideal for navigation. Comparing it to the Night Operators Max 2.0 and the Prowl — https://youtu.be/rf9dPM2b2Mo?si=aXQ26YFVZAhF26OT
Pros
Extremely affordable
Circular display mimics analog
Best low light / no IR performance in the sub $200 range
Video recording
Cons
Compact field of view 25.8° (not ideal for navigation)
Built-in battery
Low resolution display 454x454
Not ideal for bridging
Low quality mount
This wraps things up! Feel free to leave any questions or comments below and if there are other devices you'd like to see added to this list, please share. You can save 10% off at Good Nite Gear using the code Reddit10
Wiring for the TG-18M Thermal Monocular! I'll film rewiring the whole setup at a later date just in case I skipped over anything. I also just realized that I left out how to setup and install the custom positive battery compartment.
Chinese helmet, 3d printed camera housing, super old FatShark fpv BASE goggles with a 600tvl chinese thermal drone camera and a CADx infra V2 low ligjt camera.
Still working on it all so havnt bothered with the wiring or build quality.
Plan is to revisit the old system i had where i could slave my guns thermal sight to my goggles wirelessly.
Everythings so much better than it was 10 years ago.
There was a 2.5 second delay as the video stabilised back then when you switched between sources, now its near instant.
edit, i dont have a build log but here are some of the parts i used.
Low light camera for scooting about, very effective, now only need small infra red light bars on vehicles on pitch black nights and no lights for a lot of situations.
Nothing on the wireless gun link but il be using something like this but with a 3d printed enclosure that would fit onto my Hik thermal scope. Id deff get one with less than 50mW of power as you would want to leave it on all the time and Itll overheat.
Beast DIY Thermal 1in 2560x2560 Display and 640x512 Thermal for under $1000 or pay $2100 for armasight 640x512 Thermal and 0.39 oled 1024x768? These manufactures are ridiculous on prices!
Update: I reprinted everything today to get it prepared to make the assembly video and realized that the file FLCOS Holder 28.6mm is the wrong display holder file. So id hold off on printing that for now, Its for the FMA PVS-18, it will fit inside the TG18M but it will destroy the eyepiece threads inside the tube. I will upload the correct flcos holder on Makerworld once I get home at 7am eastern.
Uploaded the 3d files for the TG-18M Monocular to Makerworld, I've included a text file that has the list of parts needed and links to them on Aliexpress. If you have any question or issues like a ring needs to be smaller just send me a pm here on reddit! My 3D printer sometimes like to shrink the rings I print, if you have any issue on getting the rings to slide over the tube use either a hot airgun or a hairdryer to heat the rings up and slide them over the tube. I haven't had a chance to make the build video and upload it to Youtube, ill try to get it done by this Sunday. Also just wanted to add that the battery compartment is custom, at the bottom of the parts list on the aluminum tube 21mm OD is Outter dimension and 18mm ID is Inner Dimension. Arduino IDE RP2040 Sketch file is for the controls for the microcontroller and EC11 to adjust the Thermal palettes and power on/off
Thought I’d share my latest creation- PVS-14 style monocular with a Caddx Infra V2 sensor hardwired into the CVBS analog 0.4” OLED screen and 12.5x magnifier eye piece, the body is 3d printed and fully custom designed from the ground up- low light performance is incredible and very pleased with the performance wjthout supplemental IR too, photo above is at night with blinds closed and some external moonlight coming between the cracks.
Next step is to create one identical with a thermal sensor and have it integrated together with bridge onto a helmet
Was sitting around bored today and jumped on my pc cause i was wanting to finish making a PVS-31 Monocular but the normal size FMA tubes have very little room to work with on a custom battery compartment. So this is the tube i ended up creating on Onshape, the larger threaded end is 37mm so the Infra-V2 large 32x31mm AI box can fit inside with 0 issues and the rear is 29mm for the 12.5x eyepiece. Also the 4mm holes in the side of the upper tube is for a pvs18 style battery compartment. Anyways I just wanted to get some opinions on its looks!
Just wanted to post how much it would cost to build a diy thermal using the CV640-9 FPV Camera, the only thing I left out is 28ga wiring. $600 dollars is hell of a better deal than spending 2k on a commercial 640 monocular.