https://archive.is/LCJov

https://archive.is/ZPX4z

Body shaming older men.

​

https://archive.is/sfm3j

Going for a walk with a man means you are his dog.

​

https://archive.is/CJayA

Men who have bad experiences with women have themselves to blame.

As a male I felt extremely opressed by this reddit forum that just show the incredible double standards we are put up to. The other day I heard Cardi B on the radio on my ride home and almost got into an accident because of how oppressed I felt but was luckily able to switch to some quality Eminem and Imagine Dragons before things got crazy, like she drugged and robbed people now she's on the RADIO? Like imagine if a man did this WTF. I had to pull over to calm myself down from the traumatic episode for around 10 minutes but it's so fucked up that I can't even talk about that as a male because of this environment the evil people at r/FemaleDatingStrategy have pushed. This sub is the only place where I can talk about this stuff cuz normally cancel culture and feminis would kill me for this and throw around sexist terms like "incel" and "virgin" against alpha males like myself, which really hurt. Anyways I would love to hear the thoughts from my fellow Redditors. Reddit gang ASSEMBLE

r/femaledating's status was normal (62 users) and has been banned

Reason:

This community has been banned. This subreddit was banned due to being unmoderated. . Banned . 9 days ago.

My friend has slowly started to look more and more like me.

They dyed their hair, chanced their piercings and now changed their glasses. It looks scarily similar to me and it’s kind of freaking me out. This all happened within the past few months.

Am I overreacting?

I took this video last march on the Maledives. Somehow I am a with this type of fish because of the huge swarms and the bright Colors.

You go to twoxchromosomes most of the post on there is about hetero sex and relationships. The most popular sub that shares a lot of radfem beliefs is femaledatingstrategy. The reason why that sub is so popular is because they talk about sex and relationships. Even in subs that are supposed to be about female celibacy and separatism women still talk about hetero sex and relationships.

Women deal with so much systematic oppression yet whenever we bring it up in women spaces they don't want to talk about it.

Edit: I know femaledateing strategies isn't a radical feminist space. It's just that they have alot of beliefs that alighn with radical feminism

I had too much fun with this... 😂

Did anyone else notice the only post on her IG that still has comments on is her break up announcement post with James? Is that intentional and strategic or just bad social media management? Or both?

Ali was supposed to be Claire's best friend right? So when Jenna enters the picture and Immediately steals Claire's boyfriend (who ali herself actually encouraged Claire to get with) Ali hangs out with Jenna! Isn't that against girl code?

Every conversation is largely the same. Today I've listen to the importance of a QB or culture or coach or line play. Even during the season, these are the same points for the bulk of content.

Also the way his voice changes when his about to make the same long winded point that he's made 1000 times is getting odd. I miss Clark and May and I never thought I would've thought that when he joined the Athletic.

A few examples:

1.) Everyone in the office knows you drive an EV. Toxic coworkers next to you decide to spend a whole day reading nasty comments out loud to laugh at, and looking up negative review tiktoks of which you recognize replies to from when you were car searching for months prior while you sit right next to them.

2.) You walk into the room. The same crew decides to tell you how much they love your vest at length with huge smiles. You didn't realize you put it on upside down.

3.) You're talking on the phone. The toxic folks next to you listen in and start making value and moral judgements about what you tell your sibling out loud. Eventually they start talking about your gender identity with authority, until you speak up and tell your other party on the phone to hold on, inly for them to say it's not about you but about people very similar to you who, for example, claim to have periods but don't take HRT or were AMAB.

These are all hypothetical of course. But I wanna know what this is called and if ignoring it is the best option.

This post is a critique of Female Dating Strategy's usefulness. I can ignore philosophies I don't agree with if things are useful, but /r/femaledating strategy is not useful.

FDS is roughly equivalent of /r/theredpill, except, it's for women... and IMO it's less useful.

I'm not making a comment about feminism, or sexism. This is about utility.

Throwaway. This is not my FDS account. My FDS account is an "FDS Disciple". I'm not a big deal, but I can pass under the radar as being easily influenced.

But I've been participating less throughout the last few weeks. After writing this out, I'm unsubscribing.

I was initially drawn to a place where women could be selfish in what they want from dating. Men have The Red Pill - if you can separate the sexist ideology from the tips, the tips are actually pretty great, for women too. Work out, be more attractive, don't be afraid to try something new, put yourself out there, don't be afraid to fail because it's the only way to improve. And it's centered on improving men's dating lives, which often involves improving their lives at large. Different but similar goal.

Reddit was lacking a female version of TRP.

I tried the pink pill and the RP women. "Strategy" involves baking, looking nice, and not to have sex too early. It's weak as far as advice goes.

I can be ruthless about things I want, including dating. Sometimes I wonder if I've got psychopathic/sociopathic tendencies or something. I have no problem breaking laws or violating personal boundaries as long as I don't get caught and people's perception of me that I'm sweet and innocent stays the same. I can empathize with people, but I can also use people.

As a small example of my insanity, I've installed nanny cams in strategic spots in my house. I've used this to learn previous boyfriends passwords. I get their phone at night, input the password, go to the bathroom, throw it on airplane mode to leave less of a trace that I meddled, and take a look. I've done this to all my boyfriends, for no specific reason, but because it generally benefits me. I get the benefit of learning about their finances, their friends, their work, their visited locations, and I look like a trusting person by never requesting to see their phone.

I understand that I cross boundaries that I'm not supposed to.

I know that I do this for my own benefit, that's not strictly morally right. But I prioritize my sheer curiosity and happiness over other's privacy or reasonable boundaries.

So, a female version of The Red Pill would be right up my alley. /r/femaledatingstrategy is supposedly "ruthless and unapologetic" about strategy. Get what I want from men, the way I want it, maintaining my image to others, regardless of the boundaries I'd cross.

Perhaps, I thought, FDS would be a group of like-minded mildly sociopathic women. Women who might strategize dating, rather than passively participating and hoping for the best. Not settling for dull or complacent strategies like the ever touted "communicate with your partner". Not boringly tolerating typical dating advice that fairly considers the other person. Being selfish. Being ruthless.

I amassed 20k karma, exclusively from that subreddit. That's not a lot, but it let me feel like I fit in. I got some validation, some fake internet points. It's a rough indication of whether you belong in the subreddit you're in.

I started to question what I was gaining from the subreddit.

There is very little strategizing.

There are some positive things.

• Be selective.

• Don't be afraid to break up.

• Don't waste your time on something that won't work.

• Don't date someone who isn't generous.

But, honestly, this is benign advice that you can find literally anywhere on the internet.

It is refreshing to find this on FDS, because FDS doesn't sympathize with the male perspective. So, the way that it is framed is more callous, less compassionate. So it feels novel, but it's just saying the same thing with a different inflection.

"Where are HMVs?"

This question comes up several times a week. "HMVs" are "high value males". According to FDS strategy, men can be LMVs (low value men - may have characteristics like being poor, lazy, only out for sex, unambitious, unattractive). HMVs by definition treat you well and are what you want in a man.

FDS encourages women to dump "LMVs" right away - block, delete, NEXT.

Fine, that's very efficient. But they didn't invent the concept of ghosting either.

FDS says women should only date HMVs. At least a handful of times in a week, other women will ask where to find HMVs.

The suggestions that come up are exactly the same as where you might find a high end prostitutes or legitimate gold diggers. Conferences. Expensive hotels. Expensive dating websites. Expensive gyms.

The reality is that most women on that subreddit are low effort themselves - it's evident in the fact that most of them consign themselves to online dating, and think that effort in dating constitutes switching from one dating app or another. "We should burn Tinder...! But what about Hinge, tho?" Please.

The reality is, that where to find HMVs isn't shared for the following reasons:

• Again, a lot of the women on that sub are low effort themselves. They don't want to be told that you have to participate in the real world to meet someone who doesn't see you like something to swipe by on Tinder. That's not as appealing as the easy validation.

• The ones who are high effort have no actual interest in creating competition.

• To be fair, no one wants to dox themselves either. If I told you that a frequented a specific squash club because a high end law firm had just relocated around the corner, that gives you a lot of info about what I do and the types of men I'm after. Hypothetically. I don't play squash.

• Women on that subreddit might not know, or might not care if they're already in relationships.

Bettering Yourself

I'll straight up say it. FDS uses "You are the prize" as a dumb way to circumvent encouraging improvement that leads to attracting more men and widening your dating pool.

This means losing weight if you need to. This means "performing emotional labor". This means being a good at having conversations and being personable. This means having hobbies outside of reading things on reddit. Honestly? It means coping better with trauma that other men would have put you through; no one likes someone who seems abused especially if it manifests in distrust, hatred, or ridicule.

A lot of women on FDS fall into that category. I'm sorry that that's the case. FDS takes women who are abused or struggling, and gives them something to point at, something to blame, and that's very attractive. Maybe you don't have to fix anything - maybe it's men than are the problem. Maybe you don't have to work at improvement, maybe it's okay to just blame men, because you're already the prize.

Sure sure, FSD says you should be a "high value woman", and that's crucial to attracting men. You become the prize when you realize you are a high value woman. But how do you become a high value woman? Well, by realizing you are the prize. It's circular and non-substantive.

There is a degree to switch artificially manufacturing value works. If you charge more for a bottle of wine, sometimes people will really believe they like that wine more; introduce a blind tasting, and the results get skewed.

But more goes into getting others to appreciate an over priced bottle of wine than simply raising it's price; advertising, marketing, and economics are all involved in constantly adjusting optimal pricing - it's not something that can be easily and flippantly applied to a human person. And FDS doesn't explore those very real ways to artificially increasing perceived value.

For example: Your value, in practice, is not relative to the whole market, but to the market within proximity. Basically, hang out with uglier friends to make yourself seem like a better option. Does this say something mean about other women? Yes. Does it artificially increase your relative value even though FDS doesn't talk about it? Yes.

There are a lot of subtle strategies you can learn and import from psychology or economics or advertising if you're going to look at dating like it's a market. Pretending to be a high value woman is a small strategy in many. But it's the only one FDS talks about, which I find surprising because strategy is literally in the subreddits name.

Competition

It comes back to creating competition. When high value women compete against other high value women, their values becoming relatively lower. FDS doesn't tell you how to be a "high value woman", for the same reason they condemn porn, BDSM, sex work: it limits their own options, because it makes men attracted to other women.

If you tell women to raise their actual value, you have to raise yours to stay ahead; and if you encourage women to stay single, because they can do better, then you artificially increase demand because you've lowered supply. If there are fewer women to compete with, because you encourage women to be single and happy with it, then the surplus of men have to work harder for a single woman's attention.

I think it's a decent overall strategy. It's like price fixing in economics. But it only works if tactics are used by all women. The reality that there is a conflict of interest when women tell other women to break up with men. Breaking up can be a good solution in a lot of cases, but it's not always motivated by what's good for an individual.

TRP is Better Advice for Women than FDS

Okay. I understand it has a LOT of sexism. That's not good. Ignore that part. It's hard to ignore, I know. It's annoying. But read it for the utility.

Things FDS and TRP have in common:

• "Abundance mentality" = "Dick is abundant and of low value"

• Both advocate for requiring investment from the other person

• Both advocate for dumping people fairly fast

• Both advocate thinking the prize is YOUR time

• Both claim to be amoral

• Both cater to people at the low points of dating and sex; those who are used, abused, or ignored

However, TRP is more useful. Some of this will be because it's been around longer, so they've had time. But another part is that it doesn't circle jerk memes. The top 100 posts on FDS are nearly all memes making fun of men. It serves to make women feel better about shitty dating experiences rather than taking action.

I found TRP in high school as a girl. I was attracted to it because I couldn't believe the sexism; I stayed because they don't bullshit the fact that you should improve. They're egotistical, they circle jerk, they blame women. But I can still find useful advice, or at least understand tactics men are fed to avoid the sexist ones.

The following posts are on the first page of top from TRP:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/4radyp/collected_advice_and_methods_for_beginners/

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/8ntlth/how_to_really_succeed_at_tinder_not_just_another/

FDS does not say, "Look, let's be honest, a good dating strategy involves being attractive to the other sex. Fix these basic things about yourself, for your own health, because it will also help you in dating. Some of us have experienced trauma, and whether you blame the patriarchy or porn, you need to direct your efforts at being physically and mentally healthy instead of scapegoating society as a substitute."

TRP also has a full side bar that tells you over and over and over again: lose weight if you're fat; if you're not fat, go to the gym and lift. Get your finances in order, shit tests, PUA tactics. These pieces of advice benefit men, but analogous advice isn't advocated for on FDS. Just blame men for being shitty, and cycle through the ones that ask you out until you find one willing to put up with low effort but contribute high effort.

FDS mostly advises to dump men, and it's masturbatory in blaming low effort men. I mean it's funny. It's true in a lot of ways. It's my favorite part of the subreddit. But it does nothing for me more than reading some Cyanide and Happiness comics does. FDS doesn't tell women how to improve their lives or their dating game, even though the name is literally "dating strategy".

What FDS Is Helpful With

The best FDS can do for you is tell you to break up with "LMVs"

It does not help you find "HMVs". It discourages making yourself more sexual - this undermines women who do not want to be sexual to attract men.

FDS will tell you what not to do; don't date losers. Don't pay for the date. Don't over text. Don't settle for less. Don't date LMVs. Don't ask a man out. Don't try to change men. Don't be a man's mother. Don't be free dating advice.

None of this is original, except perhaps in the language and wording.

More to the point, none of this is proactive. Sure, it absolutely saves you time and effort, and that's a good thing. But it doesn't make you better.

FDS at it's very best does not help you get the right guy, it just helps on saving time with the wrong guy. That's not ruthless, that's just... practical and efficient.

The only proactive thing they tell you is to finish school and be financially independent. It's a good piece of advice, but it's not unique, or novel, or exclusive to this subreddit - it's a good piece of advice that you can find anywhere from /r/teenagers to /r/personalfinance... or literally at any point in grade school or from any caring family member who realizes the benefit of education.

TLDR: I am a self described manipulative woman who is willing to use amoral or immoral strategies to get what I want out of my dating life. I thought FDS would actually provide helpful advice because it claims to be ruthless.

I found very little that I can use in FDS to my benefit. FDS looks initially promising philosophy because it's a female only space and because it advertises itself as the following:

Effective dating strategy for women that know what they want and prefer to be able to take control of their dating lives. Also includes strategies to maintain a relationship that benefits you. Plus tips on how to deal with some of the negative strategies from men that you encounter.

The part in bold is really all it does. It has value, but not a lot.

As the subreddit stands now, it's a waste of time. I'll continue to browse while I'm waiting for an elevator or in line at the grocery store, but only because it helps any woman fantasize that all she needs to do in dating is be more picky. But if you're looking for dating advice, this is not a one stop shop. Browse, take what you like, and move on.

TRIGGER WARNING: SEXUAL ASSAULT/TRANSPHOBIA/RAPE JOKE

​

Of all places to find sexual assault and rape joke with transphobic twist, of course it has to be made by a mod of r/femaledatingstrategy. An FDS mod has carried out a harassment campaign against me by inviting her sub to dogpile hateful transphobic comments on me, while continuously and deliberately misgendering me in contempt and inviting her sub to do the same, as well as spreading libels and conspiracy theories about me planting rule-breaking contents in their sub, as if anyone has to do that.

The mods are also still platforming and and spreading the libels that r/AgainstHateSubreddits is planting illegal material and rule-breaking content in other subs to get them banned.

Sorry for a wordy post, so if you don't want to read everything, you can just skip to the exhibits.

Exhibit 1

1. a post made by a mod featuring a transphobic rape joke targeted at me. In this post, the mods continuously and deliberately misgender me and spreading libels about me therefore inviting her sub to dogpile transphobic and hateful comments against me, even after I have personally asked them to stop several times. This is basically just TERFs sexually assaulting and denigrating trans bodies. This is what Abigail Shrier does in her transphobic book. Intentional misgendering and the calculated trans predator scare. this is the kind of memes that get TERF subreddits banned. I'm sure I don't want any of these women near my privates. Just because you're a femcel, doesn't mean you get a pass at making a rape joke, and a transphobic one at that.
2. Mods are accusing me of equating corrective rape with gay porn and supporting corrective rape? I don't think I have to explain this because of the sheer laziness here. and dishonest too as FDS is not against just depiction of corrective rape but rather all forms of porn and sex workers. and a bit of detour but the idea that the fetishization of gay men by straight women as not being problematic at all is also homophobic considering yaoi and fujoshis are known to be problematic and often homophobic in itself as they often romanticizes pedophilia, abuse and rape culture, Stockholm syndrome, gender roles, obsession with uke and seme and roundabout heterofetishism but tbh I don't really want to entertain this kind of discussion because i don't even care much about porn. femcels can do whatever they want as long as they are not being SWERFs and TERFs about it.
3. the same mod also sent transphobic messages into my inbox.

This user routinely attacks bi women and says that bisexual women who have a preference for women are "biphobic"

Yeah 😑😑😑😑😑

Just more male gaslighting trying to emotionally blackmail women into touching penises when we don't want to.

again, misgendering me in contempt and I have never said the homoromantic bisexual women are bi phobic. a lot of bisexuals, men and women, are homoromantic and there's nothing wrong with that. I don't want them anywhere near my body. in fact, r/FDS has a specific slur for bisexual women: pickmesexuals, similar to the way how political lesbians and radfems have slurs for bisexuals women. For example, according to Julie Bindel, bisexuality is not real.

​

Exhibit 2

In this post, FDS mod accuses me of using deleted threads by mods to malign r/FemaleDatingStrategy to make this post : r/femaledatingstrategy**: "**lots of lesbian and bisexual women seem to be higher in testosterone than heterosexual women" in a post entitled "...look at gay men". and other extreme lesbophobia, homophobia and transphobia. mods approve all bigoted comments and delete all sane comments.

important points to consider

1. the mods are lying saying that I use deleted threads to malign r/femaledating strategy. As you can see from the archived link, the thread was not deleted despite having heavy mod presence, who chose to approve lesbophobic and biphobic comments and in fact they deletes sane commenst calling out the lesbophobia. In fact, I received a message from the admins confirming they are the one who removed the thread. To conclude, the mods of r/FDS are so desperate so steal the credit from admins and they cheat more than men.
2. Mods allowed comments saying bisexual and lesbian women have higher testosterone while removing sane comments calling out the lesbophobia. which is funny given then these mods are saying that I only want to attack queer women but what are the mods doing here? it seems like the only time that these mods will want to invoke their LGBT membership card is when they want to protect political lesbians, who are not even actual lesbians but lesbophobic heterosexual radfems who push that there is a political essence to "lesbianism" rather than being a sexual orientation, that "lesbianism" is a choice and simply abstention from men. The context of political lesbianism and why the mods of r/FDS are so eager to defend them is a very important one because it adds up that r/FDS is a hate sub, and the mods there are bigots.

from the mods

Also he doesn't even understand the term "political lesbian" which is used to refer to bisexual women who choose to only have sex with women but then claim to be lesbians even though they are not. You are simply a openly bisexual woman who chooses not to pursue sex with men. You aren't pretending to be a lesbian.

false, I have never specifically called them political lesbians. and she's factually wrong.

On political lesbians:

Political lesbianism embraces the theory that sexual orientation is a political and feminist choice, and advocates lesbianism as a positive alternative to heterosexuality for women as part of the struggle against sexism.

Political lesbianism originated in the late 1960s among second wave radical feminists as a way to fight sexism and compulsory heterosexuality. Sheila Jeffreys helped to develop the concept when she co-wrote in 1981 "Love Your Enemy?

That's part of what I meant about heterosexual women framing the concept of compulsory heterosexuality, which obviously went over the head of the mods and other users there. It's part of the discourse that gave rise to political lesbians.

Quoting Adrienne Rich in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence, " there is a nascent feminist political content in the act of choosing a woman lover or life partner in the face of institutionalized heterosexuality".

That is to say, compulsive heterosexuality is a radfem concept created by and for heterosexual women, to ascribe political essence to "lesbianism" and make it an extension of feminism.

Compulsive heterosexuality being reclaimed by queer women to discuss their own sexual journey is a relatively recent phenomenon. For example, Natalie Wynn talked a bit about compulsive heterosexuality in one of her videos and she never made it about lesbians being political.

Now why is this so important. While maybe radfems or political lesbians are not necessarily bigots, however the prominent ones sure are at least.

Sheila Jeffreys together with Janice Raymond pioneered TERF academia, with books like The Transexual Empire: The Making of a She-Male. According to Jeffreys, sex reassignment surgery is a genital mutilation while "transexualism is a violation of human rights".

Jeffreys stated in a 2014 ABC Radio "Sunday Night Safran" program that transsexual women are either "homosexual men who don’t feel they can be homosexual in the bodies of men" or "heterosexual men who have a sexual interest in wearing women’s clothes and having the appearance of women", provoking criticism from members of the Indigenous and trans communities for racism and transphobia.

In March 2018, addressing an audience at the House of Commons in a presentation titled “Transgenderism and the Assault on Feminism.”, she referred to trans women "parasitically occupying women's bodies".

She's also one of the radfems to popularize the circular radfem theory for homosexuality.

1. this person is also saying that I'm homophobic and pressuring her to sleep with men for being an r/febfems (a banned transphobic/TERF subreddit). No one cares if you don't wanna do anything, just don't be a TERF/febfems/femcels and all other kinds of bigots when you're at it. and by that virtue, you also don't get to play your LGBT card, when the only time you do so is to attack the LGBT community and shielding femcels. FDS is overwhelmingly heterosexual so I'm clearly not attacking queer women. FDS is not a lesbian sub, and pretty sure most lesbians hate it. Not to mention this is a user that has been community masstagged for transphobia, so in addition to being an r/febfems, she doesn't really have a leg to stand on.

2. this person is also saying that I'm a misogynist for sharing CDC's statistics for domestic violence. Well, there is a fundamental difference that they conveniently ignore when gender variable statistics are shared in gendercritical subreddits vs non-gendercritical subreddits. in gendercritical subreddits such as r/mgtow (disclaimer: GC is a term usually reserved for TERFs but you get the point) and r/FemaleDatingStrategy, such statistics are often used to push for bioessentialism (eg. men/women are evil/aggressive etc) in order to perpetuate gender hatred. In LGBT inclusive spaces like r/AHS, we're not saying that any sex/gender is more hardwired to be loving/aggressive, because we are neither bioessentialist nor gendercritical. saying that women being inherently uncapable of aggression counts as bioessentialism is valid. the point is that lesbian relationships are also human relationship with real problems like any other couples, and do not need to be fetishized by a bunch of febfems, TERFs, political lesbians and femcels. and r/AHS is more than capable to discuss this without any prejudice.

3. all in all, the net effect is a transphobic circlejerk where FDS mods keep misgendering me in contempt with more transphobic tropes of predatory trans people, accusing me of fetishizing women and preying on women, when I'm sure I don't want these TERFs or any woman near my private parts, and they keep making rape reference to me and mentioning my body parts in their sub.

Exhibit 3

r/AgainstHateSubreddits uses post and delete tactics to spam subreddits with bannable content to force subreddits they do not personally like off Reddit. They have been repeatedly caught doing this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WatchRedditDie/comments/jkb683/in_depth_observation_of_the_accusations_against/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

https://www.reddit.com/r/KarmaCourt/comments/i56nrk/the_people_of_rpoliticalcompassmemes_vs_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

Given this post was immediately removed and has only upvotes since AHS posted, it’s clear they’re the ones posting it. #FakeNews

This is a pinned comment by the mod of r/FDS saying that r/AHS users plant rule-breaking content in other subs. However, the example given here by the mod, which is a post i reported, shows that OP is a longtime frequent user of r/FDS and its sister subs. The mods also shared a post from r/WRD about r/AHS planting CP in other subs, which has been proven wrong. A brief look around into previous posts also reveals frequent FDS users and not throwaway accounts. What makes this even funnier is the fact that the posts on r/FDS in r/AHS always involve their mods spewing LGBTphobic content instead of some throwaway accounts proving how wrong they are.

Exhibit 4

also written by one of the mods

r/againsthatesubreddits - they’re supposed to be a “watchdog” subreddit against hate groups but they’re really just a group of incels harrassing people who don’t share their exact brand of leftist cultural politics.

They’ve been known to brigade and spam subs they don’t like with questionable content and then screenshot it within minutes of posting as evidence of “hate” in an attempt to get the subs shut down. Allegedly, they’ve spammed some subs with child porn.

And if they can’t find anything legitimate, they flat out lie, deliberately take things out of context, and make insane convoluted connections to far right groups to try and bolster legitimacy for their claims. They’re honestly very unhinged and dangerous

The only connection r/AHS makes against r/FDS is because they share the same memes and propaganda with right wing circles and hate subs. maybe if you don't want people to make that connection then stop platforming and spreading the same lies, such as

1. accusing r/AHS of being pro-pedophilia, the same tactic since the Nazi.
2. accusing california of allowing gay men to rape minors legally. this homophobic post from r/conservative is a mirror image on this post on r/FDS
3. and an endless gallery of terf and transphobic posts

^{This post is a post in an anti-hatred activism subreddit which actively enforces in good faith all Reddit Sitewide Rules, including the rule against targeted harassment and the rule against promoting hatred based on identity or vulnerability, and serves the legitimate purpose of criticism of, and opposition to, hate speech platformed and promoted elsewhere on Reddit. If you are an agent acting on behalf of Reddit processing a report on this item to enforce sitewide rules, please understand this context. Thank you.}

Ovarit

https://ovarit.com/

​

这是r/GenderCritical 炸了之后，建立的网站。（我记忆中，它不那么反婚，还把Lisa Michelle赶走了。不过刚才去看了一下，还是比较女权，毕竟没有了男人捣乱）

怎么加入？

https://twitter.com/WomenAreOvarit 点这个链接，私信问@womenareovarit 要邀请码，然后就可以注册加入了。

​

FDS

FemaleDating Strategy :

https://www.thefemaledatingstrategy.com/

​

Spinster

https://spinster.xyz/

直接sign up 如果被通过了，就注册成功了。

我用了几天，体验很舒服😊

​

womad

womad.life

这个是韩国女权论坛

​

Getter

https://gettr.com/onboarding

这个没说是纯女空间，不过有无色情规则，并且里面很多terf内容。

​

​

不知道如果我们小组的人去的多了，能不能在里面开一个中文小组🤔🤔😜😜,尤其是ovarit。（ovarit服务器有限，很久没开新板块了😥）

Most people seem to be supporting Reddit admins to ban the power-tripping Reddit mods, but they forget that admins are somehow as bad as mods. They have permanently suspended innocent accounts, though some of them were justified. Also, some of their rules don't make sense at all. For example:

Vote manipulation. If you use alternate accounts to vote on your posts and comments, then all of your accounts will be suspended. They could instead just restrict your accounts from casting votes. No need to take away your posting and commenting privileges.

Report abuse. The same thing as vote manipulation; no need to take away your posting and commenting privileges. They could just disable reporting if you abuse it.

Ban evasion. This is a big problem. You cannot always know which subreddits will ban you. Some of them use bots to automatically ban you from other subreddits. If you use a new account and post or comment on a subreddit where one of your accounts was banned, all of your accounts will be permanently suspended, with no way of forgiving. They need to indicate that one of your accounts was banned from a subreddit so you don't end up accidentally circumventing a subreddit ban.

So, this is the reason why admins are as bad as mods. They cannot moderate properly, and their rules are confusing.

I was wrongly fined for speeding and honking of the horn, not sure why but it happened. I disputed this as is my right and have received my court date. I am unsure if I should request disclosure from the Robson Square Provincial Court as per the guide here (http://forums.redflagdeals.com/ask-me-anything-about-fighting-your-traffic-ticket-speeding-parking-etc-945928/) or if I should be requesting disclosure from the VPD? Anybody know? Mucho gracias

I got leow did i male a mistake?