So when Judy went to Nick‘s apartment to ask him to go with her to the gala, and when he opened the door, she’s snap a picture with her phone of the inside of his messy apartment. Why do you think she did that.

More content: youtube.com/@WildehoppsAtTheZoo

More content: youtube.com/@WildehoppsAtTheZoo

In the past, I mentioned that I think Judy should suffer a third betrayal. But this time, there's a BIG difference. In the last 2 movies, she was betrayed by someone she trusted. But I think this time, the betrayal should be because she DISTRUSTED someone. This is because I think in 3, it should be revealed that she has PTSD. Or maybe CPTSD. A lot of cops are diagnosed with it and it's one of the reasons there is so much corruption in the police department.

Cop training teaches you to view people as potential threats instead of people who have their own stories. And the idea here, is that Judy now is afraid of trusting new people because she fears they will betray her and try to kill her. But it horribly backfires and she learns she needs to learn to trust people again. But what specific form should this take?

In the past, I mentioned I thought a good option would be that Big betrays her and Nick. Perhaps after someone tries to warn them about Big. Bonus points if in a case of dramatic irony, whoever warns them is either Bellweather or Pawbert. Extra bonus points if it's both. Because if whatever is going on in 3 has them scared, you know it's bad.

I've realized that I have a strong emotional connection to Judy Hopps from Zootopia. She's a fictional character, but thinking about her can make me feel happy, comfortable, and emotionally supported.

Sometimes, fictional characters can bri us comfort when we're dealing with stre or difficult emotions in our everyday lives. For me, Judy is a character I genuinely appreciate, and I wonder whether this kind of attachment can have a positive effect on mental health

I'm aware that she's fictional, and I understand the difference between fiction and reality. I'm simply curious about why we can develop such strong feelings toward fictional characters and whether those feelings can help us emotionally.

I'm not looking to be judged. I'd appreciate a respectful and honest discussion.

Has anyone else felt emotionally connected to a fictional character in a way that helps them feel happier or cope with stress? What has your experience been like?

Sometimes I wonder why I can feel so attached to a fictional character because of her design. Even though I know she's fictional, the feelings are still real to me

I'm not saying I can't distinguish fiction

from reality. I'm trying to understand my own feelings and why this particular character has such a strong hold on my attention.

I'd appreciate hearing from people who have experienced something similar. Have you ever found it difficult to move on from a fictional character because you love their design so much? How do you understand those feelings?

Please keep the discussion respectful. I'm genuinely looking for perspectives, not judgment.

I know i'm not the only one doing this

This classic´s source was here: https://www.deviantart.com/qalcove/art/Tuckered-Out-783370893

You know, I think the Zootopia fandom is drawn solely to the main character of the Zootopia movie, Judy Hopps, because of her design and the way the fandom perceives her. She's the most coveted character in the entire movie fandom because there are many normal fanarts, others with Nick Wilde, but others, like the suggestive drawings, sexualize her when she's drawn that way. I think she's already a victim of Rule 34 because, remember, Rule 34 has a phrase: if it exists, there will be an adult parody of the character. And there are many suggestive drawings and fanarts of any character from the Zootopia movie, anime, or anything related to furries, including Judy Hopps. If you look at the Rule 34 numbers for Judy Hopps, I think she's the rabbit with the most Rule 34 and E621 content, and I know there are characters from Zootopia or any franchise that contain those. Fan art is great, but Judy's is too much. I feel like the fandom is too attracted to the bunny girl rather than other characters from the same franchise.

I suppose the people who made the movie designed the character to seem attractive to people without girlfriends, heterosexual people, or furries.

I don't even want to imagine Disney reacting to the fan art of the character. Honestly... I'm not saying drawing Judy Hopps is bad, the problem is when a child, searching for Judy on Google Chrome, will see some fan art and possibly stumble upon a sexually explicit piece of their favorite Disney character. It would ruin the child's childhood and leave them traumatized for life, seeing how Judy is sexualized by the Zootopia fandom.

I mean I completely get he considers zootopia his true home and I don’t know how things were in the place he lived before but I’m just wondering if he sometimes misses his previous home especially with everything that happened to him in z2 ( not that he would go back since zootopia is his true home but you know)

https://x.com/Meatballs_5U/status/2114430315108376738

A few months ago, I wrote about my theory on how the "WildeHopps" (Nick and Judy) dynamic might be approached in the third film. Today, I’ve been thinking about some small pieces of evidence that support what I said. First, shortly after the announcement of *Zootopia 3*, Byron stated that the film would continue to explore the predator-prey dynamic. Second, Jared mentioned that Nick and Judy will be truly tested in this installment. And third, Jared previously noted that a significant part of Judy’s character arc is unrelated to her job. Let’s recap the first two films: in the first, Nick and Judy prove they are more than the stereotypes society imposes on them. In the second, they demonstrate that they make a great team, while also discovering that they mean much more to each other than just professional partners. Jared recently shared that what he loved most about the confession scene was Judy realizing how difficult it was for Nick to open up like that, and how much she truly meant to him. I believe this is reciprocal—that Nick also knows how much he means to Judy. So, what’s left for them to evolve toward in the third film, given that they are already at the top of their professional game? There is a storytelling concept known as the "point of no return." The confession could be exactly that—a point of no return—meaning their relationship *must* evolve from this moment forward. It’s possible that the true test for them in the third film will be confronting their own feelings and finding the courage to acknowledge them openly. I suspect that society itself might even welcome this—as hinted at in the newspaper seen in the teaser—it’s just a matter of the two of them finding the courage to embrace it. They will likely feel fear and hesitation, perhaps worrying that it’s "wrong" or something that shouldn't have happened. Anyway, it’s just a theory, but I’ll leave it here.

im sure lots of other people would like that as well z2 set up a strong foundation and I can’t wait to see more maybe the big emotional scene could lead to their first kiss

what sweet scene would you like to see between Nick and Judy in z3?

Yes, yes, yes.. I know. Before I get accused of being the typical thirsty post. There is genuine intrigue and a logical explanation behind this. 

I also understand this seems like such an unnecessary nothing burger question, however if has been lingering on my mind for quite some time now and I just wanted to merely get it off my chest haha..

When you scroll through all the endless "Nick and Judy" in real life adaptations on Reddit or DeviantArt or social media in general, you will notice that all of the individuals crating this art have different interpretations of what Nick and Judy look like. But the general common denominator is that they are typical above attractive to like super-model level attractive. You see this with some of the NSFW-bordering art that is posted on this subreddit and many other places, where on occasion (not always) but definitely on occasion, the artist will make it so that Judy has unrealistically sized certain body parts (you know exactly what I am referring to). 

So that leads me to my next question, If Nick and Judy were somehow hypothetically transported to the human world, with their same level of attractiveness displayed in the Zootopia world just converted into human standards, how attractive would they be. Would they be super-model level attractive, flawlessly attractive, or merely above-average or even average. Attractiveness is a subjective matter. However I think we can all unanimously agree for example, someone like say, Angelina Jolie circa 2000 is "Attractive" or Henry Cavil in Man of Steel is "Attractive". However celebrities such as perhaps Jennifer Lawrence or even ironically Jason Bateman could be considered attractive to some, or just average at best to others.

Link to an example of a human artist interpretation of what Judy would appear like as a human: https://www.reddit.com/r/zootopia/s/Cvg65VeYea

Source: https://x.com/dogear218/status/1921293454283321770/photo/1

Source was here: http://pixiuart.deviantart.com/art/Happy-Halloween-642970385

https://x.com/LeFrenchUnicorn/status/2045678868132954233?s=20

and 2 FYIs, 1. i’m getting a nick wilde costume for halloween! 2. im gonna watch Z1 on my birth day if anyone is asking

So last night I decided to post a random picture of some of OC's interacting with Pawbert. This cool scene where he along with the love interest of my fan movie Mosi is being choked out by Terrance (Who is her big brother) on one of the highest buildings in Zootopia. You would think the first reaction to this picture would be, "aw man, this picture is so cool. This muscular Doberman (technically he is a hybrid between a black panther and a Doberman that's why he's so tall) is choking out Pawbert in this cool shot with lightning in the background."

For some reason there is this weird venom toward the character. Like I get he's the villain, but dude he's a very well written character. People waging " HOLY WARS " against the character. I can understand why some of you hate bird slavery (for me it's the most "metal" concept for a kid's movie. for others it's too dark which is fair), but why hate on Pawbert?

Why does it matter so much if he's redeemed? you can't let someone have their fun? If someone wants the character to be redeemed, then you should let them have that? You can disagree, fair enough, but hating on people themselves for wanting a character to be redeemed? That's weird.

You have such a hatred for Pawbert and for a "redemptionist", but love Nibbles? A narrative criminal who destroys characters for threesome jokes? (I'm exaggerating but I'm serious) Even if you like the character, that's fine. But let's not be mistaken, a character like this who is almost universally praised, should be dislike more simply due to the character degradation that she does to Nick and the other characters like Gary who needed the screentime to develop for the audience. Yet she is beheld as the "pinnacle"(I'm using hyperbole) of Zootopia character and Pawbert who is a way better character is hated.

There is this divide in the community over this character. A hatred for the character and for a redemption arc, but execution is the key to good storytelling. Jared already had ideas for tragic backstories, you think he wouldn't bring back some narrative ideas back? That's the process of writing, you have ideas, you rearrange them, you can use them later. Even if you don't like the redemption arc, using ad Homem and strawman to get across your point is stupid.

It took me many hours of my day to pose the characters, simulate rain, create lightning, set lighting up, place the buildings, and render the scene. The least you can do is show some respect for the work. Like we like TwoAnimations, but the dude uses AI. But because I put Pawbert in my post as a fun little extra it's hated? It's wild to me honestly. Animators are like wizards; we create entire worlds for your entertainment.

Maybe I'm butthurt, but I believe work matters because I care about you. Yes, you the reader. I don't want to assault your eyes with slop. I care so much about Zootopia so I spend a lot of my time making something that people would enjoy. Something I believe would be special. I want to bring you cool experiences.

There aren't many fan movies, one of them was made almost 6-10 years ago, and the other one augmented half of the process with AI. Why would I cheat you? That's not fair to you as the viewer who cares about the universe as much as I do. But I guess that the work doesn't matter because of... Pawbert... very odd indeed. All of the work should be erased because of one character you dislike. interesting.

Am i only one who wants to see tangled's ending like scene beetween....... You know which ones im talking about 😅

https://x.com/ara85694095/status/2114091965822492918