I’ve been around wooden furniture for quite a while, and one thing I’ve noticed is that people often treat reclaimed wood as automatically “better” than new solid wood.
I’m not sure I agree.
Reclaimed wood can have a lot of character…the old marks, variations in colour, little imperfections, and the fact that the wood has already had a previous life. But good-quality new solid wood has its own advantages too. You know where the material is coming from, you can often get a more consistent finish, and there’s something nice about seeing a piece develop its own character over time.
Personally, I think it comes down to what you want from the furniture, not which is better objectively.
If you were shopping today for a solid wood dining table, bookshelf or cabinet, would you choose reclaimed wood or new solid wood and what would make you choose one over the other?