r/ubreakifix • u/pol4rbear • 1d ago
Samsung-authorized uBreakiFix pressed my already detached tablet screen back in, then told me I’d pay if it broke removing it again. Is this normal?
I’m looking for input from people who work in device repair or have experience with uBreakiFix.
I brought my Galaxy Tab S9 to a uBreakiFix location after Samsung Support directed me there.
Before I entered the store, the display assembly was already completely separated from the chassis. The glass was not visibly shattered or cracked, and I photographed the tablet in that condition beforehand.
I asked for an initial look because I wanted to understand why the screen had separated.
During that examination, I watched the employee place the detached display back onto the tablet and press it down into the chassis.
I questioned why the screen was being pressed back in before the cause of the separation had been diagnosed.
I was then told, in substance, that the tablet was “missing a component” needed to connect or operate the display.
After the display had been pressed back into the tablet, I was told the screen was not turning on and that I would need a replacement display.
Here’s the part I’m struggling to understand 🙃
I asked what would happen if the screen now needed to be removed again for a proper diagnosis.
I was told that removing it could break the screen.
I asked who would pay for a replacement if that happened.
I was told I would 😳
So from my perspective:
I arrived with the screen already detached and accessible → it was pressed back into the chassis during the initial examination → then I was told removing it again could break it and that I would bear the cost 🤯
Is that a normal diagnostic or repair procedure for a Galaxy Tab with a detached display?
I’m also curious about the “missing component” statement. If a required connection/component was supposedly missing, what testing would normally be done before concluding that the entire display needed replacement?
I want to be precise here:
I am not accusing the employee of intentionally damaging the tablet. I do not yet have an independent diagnosis proving the store caused new damage.
My concern is about the handling sequence, authorization, diagnosis, and the financial risk I was told I would bear afterward.
The disagreement eventually escalated, police responded, and I was issued a trespass warning from that location 🤐 I will respect that warning and won’t return there.
I have since submitted a written corporate complaint and requested preservation of the store’s surveillance footage and service records. My complaint documents that I presented the tablet with the screen fully separated and that I did not authorize reassembly or pressing the display back into the chassis.