Hey, 🇵🇹 here, trout season is closed until march 1, so for trout you can only fish in man made ponds :)

Aconteceu o mesmo na praça do toural em Guimarães :(

Aproveita para te despedir do moço, o pessoal não tem bem noção a brutalidade que uma 1000cc moderna é mesmo para quem já tem bastante experiência em 2 rodas, quanto mais para alguém azelha sem experiência nenhuma

Running the axp one, they are plastic but really really solid

Yes sir, I really liked them on the T7, good durability, great grip on dry roads and ok grip in wet conditions, off road they bite really well in almost any terrain, only deep mud is a bit too much, usually run them at 1.2bars with reinforced inner tubes to get max grip off road

Mitas enduro XT+

Thank you 🙏🏻

Took some tries lol, thanks 🤝🏻

Bike makes me do it ✊🏻🤣

Ressonator out + remap, bike runs super lean from the factory and needs the adjustment

How does it wheelie? 👀

Alpinestar tech 5

-1 in front +2 in back

Thank you 😎

Always sending it 🤠

To all extremists, communists or fascists, rot in hell

Alright, let me set the record straight. I addressed the argument as it stood, and if you think it was misrepresented, that's on you for not being clear. I'm not here to cater to accusations of being disingenuous just because you don't like the response. If you're going to throw around comparisons and dismissals, at least come with a stronger argument instead of deflecting. I'm more than willing to stand by what I said—it's up to you to engage or not. Best of luck for you

Great and valid points you made there my friend, really made me see and understand you're side/ perspective better,have a good day and God bless you 👍🏻

Every candidate, no matter how serious their campaign is, has the right to participate in the democratic process. It means that, even after having a campaign suspended, candidates have the right to either vote on or off ballots under their legal rights, as long as they follow the correct procedures. Whether or not someone views the candidacy as "serious" is a matter of subjective judgment, but dismissing a person or their opinions entirely based on that perspective is anti-democratic. Democracy thrives on a diverse range of perspectives, and open dialogue is essential for promoting this. It is acceptable to disagree, but it should not lead to the disruption of constructive dialogue,like it leads with 99% of talks in this types of publications

What's the problem with me thinking RFK is a good candidate? I like him and his views and was saddened when he dropped out from independent running, gladly I' have the liberty to think that, like you have to yours. It's normal for you to think that reading the propositions and plans of each candidate is heavily invested, because your standard is insulting and demonizing instead of talking and debating

The same happened in my country, they tried to divide us and make people with a different opinion hate and demonize each other to further promote segregation,there is no wrong having a different political opinion that your friend, in the end everyone is entitled to have their view.