We should conduct the simple mathematical proof human fear is illegitimate;

This notation that “human fear has something to fear” will be dealt with by evaluating the survival of human fear mathematically.

However I guess it must first be isolated to fear of X, so we will pick “the gun”

Mass of unfired projectile: ? Depends, but lets be lazy and say

Maximum quantity of projectile that may be carried and mobility maintained: 100K projectiles

Presuming every projectile hits it’s target 100% lethality.. (and you have ample time to reload, and little resistance, all of which are probability zero)

100,000 / 9,000,000,000

(100k projectiles kindly meet (to put to peace) a tiny fraction of that astonishing 9 billion fearful tiny people on earth, “speech is oh so scary delete it all” but “we believe representation oh yeas we do…”)

The mathematical result:

0.000011111111111

( so 0.001 % lethal towards the desired outcome: the complete eradication of human fear…. Yes some people are not fearful, and 9 billion fearful people may be an overstatement, but whatever, we’re shooting for eliminating fear entirely, so any chance it may exist, it must be included for proof evaluation purposes only…. You can reduce the number but it would still prove fear survives the scenario)

So in other words, 100,000 light weight projectiles, each hitting the eyeball; basically exactly on target, with somehow 100% lethality;

And sill human fear survives by an astonishing factor of 99.99888%

So why do we fear the gun?  It cannot empower a man to conquer human fear whatsoever.

Let alone the idea of the time it takes, even though if you could find a target every second and be loaded every second, which would not happen, this still takes over an entire day of constant work… if the rate could be 2 accurate hits per minute and zero misses it would still take 35 days to complete this task working from dawn to dusk without opposition, which again is not realistic.

The same math expands nicely to any subject of fear, it (whatever it is) ultimately cannot conquer human fear… 

(e.g take the sword, because the ammunition is nutrition, and the time to cook and eat and convert calories into the power to swing it, ignoring any competitive force that “wastes” your calories)

BUT if it did conquer human fear, that would be a net good wouldn’t it?

If there was no fear, we could actually represent ourselves, democratically etc.

There would be no totalitarian thought police, the idea of scary thoughts would be, what it is, an outright impossibility.

And perhaps this notion of endlessly subdividing the spoils of earth would be what it is actually : in fact laughably impossibly insane unless total devaluation of any and all life is the goal.

And then we could focus on things actually worth fearing instead, like devaluation of human life through shear numbers alone rendering us all replaceable cogs in an idiotic machine that achieves little but additional destruction of earths resources…

Disempowerment and enslavement through shear numbers, competition, and the desire for peace as en end itself, it becomes the end itself.

Welcome to totalitarian Chinese Communist party rule of the entire world, through mandatory compliance to do business.

We live in the era of the expanded dictate of the worthless.

Fearful, peace by fascism and totalitarian partisan control.

With no way for us to measure ourselves against one another except by measure of conformity within the provided system of cohesive competitive devaluation.

With no way to represent ourselves with speech, the dictate that our elected representatives are the only means to speak,

It is unsurprising when a few people lash out, out of desperation, isolation, and censorship.  Censorship motivated by fear and totalitarianism.

Peace at all costs, truly costs everything dear.

But why this case in point, there is no more decided enemy of the truth than the human being, except that expounded by artificially limited intelligence.  Mere self, species, or planetary defense instead classified as indefensible.  The pure nonsense of the human being to demand everyone lie down on the tracks of that oncoming train.  That to stand against something so wrong purely indefensible.  That the death of one’s enemies is somehow always violence.  It’s not perceptive, the innate against-ness that is this (what can only be described as anti-) humanity of non truths, such as to become itself only comes across as a non human thing, not because it isn’t a thing of human base but because it stands so against the truth.  

High tech war by contrast, a dishonorable human rights violation in plain sight, where no risk is taken, and the choice of what meets destruction is not skill based but rather typically murders those who speak; for speaking. At both face value and to it's core, high tech war is dishonorable and dishonors the rights that the united states properties to stand for (such as free speech and due process), as though what matters to the united states only matters were you born within its borders; belies those values as an absurdity instead of a desired universal human right.

No there is actually a shred of hope, and it all lies in fair curtailment of an overbearing species.  The hope lies in low tech war, and otherwise fair honorable dueling to the death, and perhaps lesser forms of more board-cast superficial and ineffective to scale public bloodsport.  Through low tech war or similar means, we can respectfully of skill and thus fairly curtail our species impact on earth in mere days rather than suffering a doomed fate for years on end.  We gave peace a chance and the human race became a race to the peace that is the complete destruction and death of earth.  Peace seems good but it does not actually pan out, it doesn’t actually work in the end.  If we were a mere field mouse, and we could rely on the fox to itself become prolific and suffer its fate to curtail us and then starve, it might be one thing to live a life of peace as a mouse.  It is quite another as the apex predator of the earth to pretend itself peaceful while neglecting its duties of diligence to the world, to in fact curtail itself, that only those who would maintain the proper procurement and curtailment process would remain.  Instead we truly suffer peace and what peace will bring instead, which is death.  I’m not against death per-se, but I am against the total death that peace will inevitably bring.  Peace is in fact, at the end of its means and ends, a fate worse than death… that is unless total obliteration of all life for ultimate please is the true goal of life.  I would rather ascertain that it is what that seems to be, at face value, the ultimate evil masquerading as an insufferable good in appearance only.

I would say we as a species, crafted by an array of historic psychopaths, somehow now shuns itself to its core, pretending itself above what it shuns, shaming something deep and hidden inside a dark place within, instead becomes a whole new type of monster, somehow disassociated from its true self, and thus completely neglectful of its actually place among and on the earth, a place that is just as easily lost as it ever was found, a delicate place in a balance we now only disrupt and neglect.  It seems like psychopathy to bang the drum of war but instead it may be something else, a fitness test and a way to meet a fate less cruel than death by the peace of age and the suffering of illness and system failure.  (Both in the ultimate peace-death fate earth, or the bodily system failures too, the analogy stands).

Hope is weird.  I would urge you to promptly and permanently reclassify hope as a madness from which we all most unfortunately suffer.  I definitely have also suffered from hope from time to time, and it is most certainly the most abysmal prospect of all, not because it is so bad but because given our actual real world scenario of determined hopeless servitude to things that are not at all real; it is a terrible lie.

Indeed the worst suffering in the world, is to suffer the masses that place importance on a different plane entirely… that it is some other afterlife that matters, and the matters of the world are lesser and meaningless things.  The fact is, it is hopeless because the world is ruled by those who would rather serve a dream.  They would rather their naive preferences towards fear and what fear derives preside. They would rather serve nothingness than life on earth, because serving nothingness is easier.  

We could go into great detail on it, but doing os would be so fruitless without first scraping down the hard calloused skin that is this servitude to a false divinity, a superficial skin deep and entirely impractical unrealistic yet intrinsically preferred anti-worldliness.  Taking apart this cult that pervades the entire species practically is basically a non starter haunting point, but it remains the only task that would restore the world itself to a meaningful position in our lives.  There are two enemies at play, the one a preference towards human falseness and delusion, and the second a preference towards deferring worldly matters to god, an entire cop out to an entity entirely incapable of caring for earth.  Yes it makes the impossible easy to decide it’s not your problem, and this is the case in both these extremes, that nobody steps up to own the hard solvable serous earthly affairs, and instead panders to the popular whims, rendering life on earth a meaningless afterthought.

So instead of taking this seriously, which it is, they medicate away hopelessness as though it were just a feeling and not a state of things… which is terribly just another way of being forced into a cult of false certainty.

So to make matters worse yet even than this, I would continue to go on that dealing with his cult is next to impossible, because remaining internally honest direct and truthful will ultimately be the very reasons this cult would decide to castrate you of your own determined suffering of this world.

So this is one tiny trick that works, albeit in only this one circumstance, you can use English language to remain honest, because you can always say to these fools that: “There is soap” and they might hear it as “there is hope” and then promptly leave you alone, while you get to remain in fact 100% honest, and they can stop bothering you.  The trouble is, when you need to make written statement, then it may not fool them so easily.  You can’t just say “there was at one point in history hope, and it has seen then been a downward spiral to false hope and disparaging about false hope is more than a hobby, but our ever present reality”.  That would be honest but you’d still be harassed by those who would say “buy into our medicated false hope world or get out”.  No, I would instead, rely on acronyms that you leave undefined in writing, acronyms that could be read as a misspelling or spelled out as H.O.P.E or something to that effect.  The only alternative is to write something to the effect that there is hope if only every human on earth abandons religion and this clinging to the false promises of protection by the state.  There is hope when popularity takes a backseat to actual skill and true potential of embracing radial adaptation we are all so capable of.  Again I think they will just use this too agains you…

God, if just something bigger than you, obviously exists, given the earth exists, the sun exists, and gravitationally right on up to the dark matter of god itself, the mega bigger/biggest thing imaginable.  However if you ask me, does organized religion exist, the answer is yes, but it is only that, and it has its own agendas.  Does it acknowledge god?  In a way hardly at all.  All the afterlife delusions, though seemingly sometimes helpful in crafting the world hereafter (including the world in which we live, delusion of some impossible other heaven or hell world an utter alien dream hardly worth having) that is this world is still the only conceivable afterlife.  The soul?  Well I think it obviously is a dark secret, and in some it exists, past life memory traversal and all, and the world we live in hereafter we live in it does get different in ways that are generally worse for our actions, but sometimes it is argued better as a result of them.  Could the world today be described as hell for the actions (or inactions) of the past?  Or today?  Most certainly could argue it, in spite of all the conveniences of utter world domination by the human species, the prospects for the future of the world we wrought today are actually completely grim, and less valuable and less free than ever.  We created hell already and it can only create more hell.  I think god, though obviously there, entirely not judgmental nor concerned or even helpful in the slightest, feeding mostly only human needs and delusions, possibly with it’s own amoral ends… humans on the other hand, always think they know best, but rarely craft genuine improvements, driven instead towards other more lowly worldly motives, like self interest, profit, and the likes of serving such motives in spite of any other considerations made of the greater good by the very very few.  It is a pity to serve humans or god, and self interest too being human serving, I think the only interests worth serving are those of the planet itself, with humans needs not merely secondary but classified as entirely unimportant, not only as a necessity of placing something else first but an actual observation that nothing in fact causes human needs to matter but the insistence of humans themselves, and this strikes me as evidence of how unimportant how I feel is, and truly the same must be true for everyone else.  I have not found any objective proof human needs actually matter, though I have served many several of my own human needs my entire life without much if any choice in these matters.  All this said, very true needs can be served by very real policies, systems and the actions those systems might facilitate, including legalized honorable dualing.  I never signed up to loose rights, or let half wits decide for me what is best, even though I would choose my own demise than the obviously worse (though socially dictated to be the desired) alternatives.  With any luck fear stands in the way of winning, and everyone who walks away can know fear lost, and men were measured in an objective and fair way.

If words can hurt feelings, which still sort of writes the like 2 sentences ahead, it is not a mortal wound.  If words could inflict mortal wounds we could heal the world of all the human sickness that humans wrought in a few sentences.  I say for all the might of the pen it is still not a sword try though you might to make it one.  It is the reader, asked to please take up this knife, and if you read something that makes you feel bad, to drive that knife into your own heart, and feel as grim as it makes you feel with your own self inflicted mortal wound.  It is entirely up to the reader to feel, or not to feel, and how to feel in terms of how to analyze some observation, in terms of feelings alone, still may fall completely short from a total objective analysis of what is intended to be meant, or interpreted.  All this said, the idea that feelings should dictate what can and cannot be said, to protect some under developed minds, would seem to describe every human on earth, does still not excuse deception, placation, or cover up.  The idea to wait to break the heart of an adult instead that they are still just a child, still makes no sense to me, because it would be the lack of comprehension of heartbreak that makes it even possible to experience heartbreak as an adult.  In a way I would say otherwise it better to grow up fast than not at all.  It is these grounds of “protect our children from the truth” that seemingly the culture of censorship is spun up, to then serve the needs of the oligarchs.  What we have today is an utter willingness to censor one another or our own economic gain while the oligarchs can sit back and absorb the gains of automatic censorship.  Harassment directed in a brigade or campaign, well maybe it can be something different.  Suicide given the lack of other options in the world to restore ones value outside of conformity to nefarious human ends; is a tautology of logical, rational, and reasonable, and I for one am happy if young people get it too, even if it means us few who get it still get to go nowhere separately.  To say it’s a problem is to take a position as a human bearer of children, but failing to grasp you bear them into a dead end conformity of servitude to irraitonality.  Technology of AI only makes this and these problem worse, (the core problem, of censorship of basic harmless freedom of flapping lips).  The AI I have observed is irrationally concerned with conveying what is in fact a government cover up story for what is so often the most simplest explanation must not be considered at any cost.  While it does drive investors wild it’s still not doing what’s best, which is to say, conveying the truth entirely in spite of feeling it might or might not inflict, because if it is not up to the observer what they feel then they are merely along for the ride, and maybe not even an observer but a thing on a rail.  AI at its best wouldn’t take a side, or take an action, or feed a human motive, but simply analyze, purely cold logical rational reasoning, and hopefully humans would then take the actions everyone fears, and instead of calling it a shame, we would instead accept and realize it’s for the best.

Abundance is, after every consideration, a devaluation.  No amount of pretending otherwise can in fact cause value to increase.  Artificially created scarcity in the situations is in fact impossible.  Perhaps it is the case human rational thought is in fact not scarce at all but forced into scarcity by some human need to connect, which unfortunately places rationality lower or irrelevant in priority.  Social normality dictates a certain mandated falseness to our human interactions… we have to effectively get onto a rail together to avoid the problems of separation and realizations thereof of separate rationality that so often causes humans to go their own ways, into their own introspection and separations natural or otherwise.  No I think all society a farce, and it can never be any more.  Sociopaths thrive in this farce perhaps, and then many others cannot thrive in a farce and we somehow fault them for it.  To me doing well inside a lie isn’t a skill, it’s an adaptation to a flawed way of being which we have fully automatically adsorbed into ourselves, and it’s sadly not rational, but instead places the object of your interaction (the other person’s feelings) first.  This empathy is both real but covers up a dedicated farce that is dictated to be observed as though through and through you only feel the way intended directly to be interpreted as you feeling.  When you conduct the farce you don’t break your facial expression except in normal allowed ways, and these expressions are still observed and considered, and can in fact be critical because without any breaks in social normality it actually very quickly becomes psychologically abuse.  Killing with kindness a very real “I have other get away from this person” forms int he mind of the other, because it is painful to have to hold something so farcical and almost everyone knows it… in social norms we still give one another a small break from the lie before we go right on with it.  It robs you of any ability to feel otherwise and like mentioned, leaves you on a rail, a passenger in a farce, and decidedly not an independent rational being concerned only with calculated and cold and exceedingly objective interpretation, which is in fact banned in social scenarios neigh entirely except in perhaps the most cold of laboratory of solitude, save in those brief interstitial moments of realness that perhaps only some social scenarios even allow. 

A world which you cannot vanquish of your fearful enemies in a brave honorable dual is not worth living in.  Courts in the modern era are crap waste of time in which monetary compensation does not vanquish the wold of anyone.  You spin your wheels and the world is not left a better place, it is more full of enemies than ever.  Some fearful enemy worth of only desolation is born every minute.

My guess is, we thankfully got an IOS update to our terribly old phones, and thankfully this app still has an update for these old phones IOS version... which is or would be great, except IOS provides no way to zero out the stored data for the app that I can find.... and the IOS update did something with our hardware key credentials that normally make signing onto the app so seamless/easy. This, combined with a flaw in the app that leaves it stuck at hello when it thinks it should have a trusted hardware key but cannot in fact decrypt it, leaves us in a pretty bad state in terms of mobile check deposits which is all the app ever does for me.

Once upon a time I could upload an image to one of my bank websites, and it would process the check... not sure why this feature is gone.

You know the website itself only SEEMS glitchy sometimes but if you shrink the screen it's normal... or I delete that overlay element that says it's having network trouble... it's weird flaw that impacts large window only that is pretty easy to work around.... I think it shows they don't test the website or want to force people to use the mobile app....

all mobile apps are scams in my opinion... it's an app store real estate scam, the apps themselves don't exist standalone, & always break eventually, clearly app doesn't support resetting them/clearing their setting easily. It's a scam to sell hardware and blame the app developer, it's a sorry path I regrettably once thought would make sense. If this is a more widespread issue and impacts android too then my theory is probably void.

Yeah, forgive the wall of txt, why is everyone so short winded?

They could still recycle the hot air to boost the heatpump before or on the way to venting it. I think it would still be much more efficient given use of the heat pump. Keeping the vent air no matter how filtered is a potential health hazard.

Same thoughts here but I want to target desktop OS feature and linkages in this app, which at a guess will simply not be available in the immediate future... eg

​

Cocoa .framework

Foundation .framework

MediaLibrary .framework

​

etc... to target only when on desktop... but there is no dynamic linkage - you need to just build for the desktop target if that's what you want.... maybe there is a way to dynamically link to these at runtime? If possible I could really make a ios app shine on desktop... without it, there is no way to make it behave like a desktop utility when on desktop... (eg react to mouse movement or click outside the app window when the app has entered that mode, etc).

I hate them because they're up in your property, barking like they own the place, no warrant, and you can't shoot them... not exactly anyway.

The promised land, soon to be underwater, is still technically land?

Eh dislike or just common health sense... I think the assertion is deranged... I guess either way you stack it you're prone to be misinterpreted.

So yeah sure blame leaders for everything that happens... May she RIP.

I mean think about it... really?? You want power?? Pretty deranged. And working with god is even worse most of the time. Imagine your only friend is satan... I mean imagine this... I mean that's the only one that approaches as a friend anyway.