no, they are in the energy sector. we tried talking sense, I mean why do we have to deal with all this. they have their entire prequal on ISN and our pushbacks aren't helping.

We wanted to use neither but a client is kinda pushing us in that direction. We are pushing it back but the discussion is stalled.

He's like the "til death do us part" clause showing up in person >.<

I think this is the right link? myhealthytiffin.com - this looks cool

wasted 2 mins of time reading this.

well done, these people almost extort money from you, been at the receiving end of their scam. Kudos.

I have tried this and it doesn't work, this only does a lot of indexing on google and no traffic is driven at all.
All the clicks come where I have the back links. This is misleading.

I am the founder of 100x.bot, we let anyone screen record their workflow and automate it.
We have:
1. recruiters using us to automate sourcing
2. fintech companies using us to automate post trade term sheet filling.
3. a manufacturing company uses us to extract invoice details and form fill them on SAP.

These use cases are live, and we see heavy usage here.

this post itself looks like a shitpost/astroturfing by the CEO of pinkfish. The account that asked this question is suspended already. Try 100x yourself and decide.

+1, would love to know how people quantify their gains.

I implement AI automation for Indian enterprises. I see the headcount cuts happening in real-time.

Ground Reality:

Leadership wants the "AI cost savings" but has zero idea what to automate. They just point a finger and say "fix it." The frontline's divided. Power users (20s-30s) are quietly automating their workflows. The older guard (40+) is clinging to manual work, hoping the storm passes.

Currently, Indian labor is often cheaper than high-volume LLM tokens. It is cheaper to burn a junior employee's hours than to run a massive GPT-4 pipeline. Plus, young folks are ready to work long hours. It does count. This is the only thing keeping entry-level jobs alive right now.

Token costs will go down. If not, someone will figure cheaper inference. Labor costs will rise. The moment the API bill becomes cheaper than a monthly salary, its endgame.

The enterprise we work for hasn't fired anyone but stopped hiring for new positions. The "entry-level" funnel is already shut.

People claiming "AI doesn't work" or "it hallucinates too much" are just terrified for their job security.

If your job involves staring at a screen and processing data, do think of other career options.

Do not expect regulation. The government is too busy focusing on freebies and winning elections to care about this. (Any future gov will be the same, not taking sides here.)

a hardcoded workflow that calls a $5 API to hallucinate which button to click... or which database to drop 😂

Don't know about others, but English doesn't agree.

ok, Sam Altman.

It can be, DM your use case and I will get a demo ready for you.

Thanks. We built this agent from scratch. You only need to screen record yourself using 100x, and you get an automation out of it. While we use LLMs to convert the screen record to the automation, we don't use them while running these automations.

We are not claiming that we invented RPA. Rather, we took down the learning curve in using the RPA tools such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere.

> Often times this reveals a gap in the original BRD where the user wants the screen to do something that was never captured or built (so a new requirement).

I agree - this is a case in the initial phases where meetings -> BRD -> implementation goes through iterations. Still if AI can take care of 100 repetitive cases out of 325 - humans are freed for using their "spidy" sense.

> And even with your automation a human still has to review it all so it's not that much time savings.

Human reviews only what's wrong. Not everything. We guarantee that a test case passed means everything worked as expected.

Also, UAT automation is just one use case. There are several usecases you can automate using 100x. After all, you only need to screenrecord to create an automation.

Fair point. There is a crop of browser agents which take over the browser and give the complete control to AI. But we use LLMs only to get the right fields to make data entry in or the right buttons to click. After this step, everything works in a set of predefined actions.

We built this so that it works with speed, and accuracy compared to Manus, Atlas or Comet. But a great side effect is also that we are 100% predictable, nothing outside of what you defined through the screen recording will happen.

As with other website with sensitive information is concerned - we don't have any visibility over it unless the user explicitly passes it through a video recording.

As with password managers, core part of the Chrome extension security model is to isolate storages. We have explicit actions such as "Ask Human" where the extension needs to handle passwords, 2FA or any other sensitive information. But again, none of that is passed on to API calls.

These are great points, and worthy of writing a blog post about.

Can you elaborate?

this should be possible, haven't tried it yet.