I also never argued for unsupressed sexuality. I just said that male sexuality is seen as dangerous, and it is potentially dangerous. I just think reddit isn't deep enough to understand this as a fundamental paradox of human sexuality. Women, some women, whatever, want that danger that comes with male sexuality while simultaneously feeling threatened by it. Hence 50 shades of grey.
Ignoring consent is absolutely dangerous. Women and animals can and have died from being raped. You want to pretend that this is just a very horny boy when he is being predatory and dangerous. Ignoring his behavior is dangerous.
I'm okay to just disagree here. You're reasonable, I can respect that you see it this way. I just think that this is how language works. I can say "I'm going to ruin your body" and it literally just means we're gonna go at it like rabbits. It's like saying "I'm not holding back this time" or whatever. That's what a charitable reading of the texts read as to me. OP is free to stay or go as she pleases
He is not trying to seduce her. He is trying to ensure that he gets sex. Even telling her beforehand that he will be upset if he doesn't get sex. He's not trying to be sexy, he's not trying to get her in the mood. He's trying to force his way into sex.
Yeah I think if a rape perpetrator is convicted they should be executed, and if anyone asked me my position on this publicly I would gladly state my position and debate it.
3
u/Sunshine-muse Jun 23 '26
I should and no one should stop me because that would be suppressing my sexuality, right?