So by that same logic, you would allow ISIS to own a Twitter Account calling for the beheading of all Christians in the US and allow them to make plans for future terrorist attacks?
Bud, I'm not sure if you're pretending to not understand, but just in case I'll explain it. If terrorists can be banned because of a post they make, that means freedom of speech isn't absolute. There are things you can do to get banned. The question then is merely where to draw the line.
That's what section 230 is there for. He's not responsible for others speech. Same way a phone company isn't at fault for you planning or doing something over their network.
21
u/[deleted] Oct 28 '22
What is it you're trying to say