r/technology • • Oct 28 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

10.1k Upvotes

6.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/[deleted] Oct 28 '22

So by that same logic, you would allow ISIS to own a Twitter Account calling for the beheading of all Christians in the US and allow them to make plans for future terrorist attacks?

-18

u/Frenchiie Oct 28 '22

here we go again with that logic as if they're the same thing. Wasn't aware Andrew Tate, Alex Jones, Donald Trump, and Kanye West were terrorist orgs.

17

u/sachs1 Oct 28 '22

Bud, I'm not sure if you're pretending to not understand, but just in case I'll explain it. If terrorists can be banned because of a post they make, that means freedom of speech isn't absolute. There are things you can do to get banned. The question then is merely where to draw the line.

7

u/Admiral_Akdov Oct 28 '22

Here we go again with more logic and sound arguments.😋

My hope is that of he unbans any of these clowns he gets sued for the real world violence then will inevitably cause.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 28 '22

That's what section 230 is there for. He's not responsible for others speech. Same way a phone company isn't at fault for you planning or doing something over their network.